Re: [Marxism] Benjamin and Kolhatkar support Rouhani

2019-02-15 Thread STEVEN ROBINSON via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

The way the Shah, Muhammed Reza Pahlavi, got into power in the first place is 
not all that different than how he returned to power after Mossadegh was 
overthrown.

His father, Reza Pahlavi, was Shah at the start of World War II.  Evidently he 
sought to keep Iran neutral and the Brits arranged his ouster, spiriting him 
away to exile in Egypt and placing his young son on the throne.  I don't know 
whether the Soviets participated in that coup but Soviet troops did occupy 
parts of Northern Iran during World War II, withdrawing in 1946.  SR


> On February 15, 2019 at 11:23 AM "A.R. G via Marxism" 
>  wrote:

> 
> My understanding was that the Shah was in power and Mossadegh essentially
> shifted the power balance in favor of the Majlis/Parliament, which is what
> triggered the CIA coup and the return of the Shah to full-on dictatorship.
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Benjamin and Kolhatkar support Rouhani

2019-02-15 Thread A.R. G via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

My understanding was that the Shah was in power and Mossadegh essentially
shifted the power balance in favor of the Majlis/Parliament, which is what
triggered the CIA coup and the return of the Shah to full-on dictatorship.

Who actually invited Medea Benjamin to Iran? Her group is very odd. They
used to organize some of the anti-Israel-Lobby stuff in DC but they've
since stopped doing that (I think over internal disputes with Palestine
groups). Their heyday really was during the Iraq invasion when they
siphoned support from Democrats.

Amith R. Gupta


On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 9:13 PM Louis Proyect via Marxism <
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:

>   POSTING RULES & NOTES  
> #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
> #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
> *
>
> On 2/14/19 9:05 PM, John Reimann via Marxism wrote:
> >   She clearly seems to think that the shah
> > was in power before Mossadegh was overthrown.
>
> But he was.
> _
> Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
> Set your options at:
> https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/amithrgupta%40gmail.com
>
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Benjamin and Kolhatkar support Rouhani

2019-02-14 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On 2/14/19 9:05 PM, John Reimann via Marxism wrote:

  She clearly seems to think that the shah
was in power before Mossadegh was overthrown.


But he was.
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Marxism] Benjamin and Kolhatkar support Rouhani

2019-02-14 Thread John Reimann via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Here is a link to an interview that Sonali Kolhatkar did with Medea
Benjamin, who just published a book on Iran. We can put to one side the
fact that Kolhatkar shows herself to be completely ignorant of the most
basic facts of Iranian history. She clearly seems to think that the shah
was in power before Mossadegh was overthrown. But that's just minor.
Benjamin talks about the rich culture of Iran and its different national
minorities. But not a word about the vicious repression of those
minorities. She mentions the green revolt of a few years ago, but even
makes that seem like something positive about the regime - as if the fact
of those protests shows that Iran is a democratic state. But the most
disgusting part is this: During the entire show, there's not a mention of
the current protests in Iran. Nothing about the women protests, nor the
movement of Iran's Arabs and Kurds, nor the labor strikes. No, the only
hint of anything going on there is a mention of the MEK, which as she
pointed out is linked with US imperialism. She thereby leaves the
impression that any movement against that vicious, far right, clerical
regime is due to US imperialism. In other words, what she's doing is
supporting the regime. And, of course, not one serious question from
Kolhatkar. I wrote her a letter of protest. I suggest that others do
likewise.

With politics like this, then we should have supported Hitler and Mussolini
when they went to war with the US! Oh, wait, that's exactly what the red
brown alliance leads to.

Here's the link:
http://www.risingupwithsonali.com/inside-iran-the-real-history-and-politics-of-the-islamic-republic-of-iran/?fbclid=IwAR04lgL5-ZGLnRolPCXS3nTC29dvVuSVKNYU00aNP7QF4yzEoSaJCXl7m-E

John Reimann

-- 
*“In politics, abstract terms conceal treachery.” *from "The Black
Jacobins" by C. L. R. James
Check out:https:http://oaklandsocialist.com also on Facebook
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com