Re: [Marxism] Eduardo Galeano Disavows His Book ‘The Open Veins’ - NYTimes.com

2014-05-23 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 5/23/14 7:38 PM, Louis Proyect via Marxism wrote:


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/24/books/eduardo-galeano-disavows-his-book-the-open-veins.html


Maybe Galeano now hates his book because Hugo Chavez recommended it (and 
helped increase MR's coffers.) In this interview he sounds like a 
Venezuelan contra:


http://aristeguinoticias.com/0603/mundo/debate-por-hugo-chavez-mario-vargas-llosa-y-eduardo-galeano/

En 2011, Galeano declaró en una entrevista en Montevideo que Chávez 
quizás era un dictador, pero “un dictador rarísimo” porque ganó varias 
elecciones limpias.


“Hugo Chávez es un dictador, sin embargo, es un curioso dictador. Ganó 
ocho elecciones en cinco  años. Y ahora, recientemente, se sometió a un 
referéndum en el que preguntaba a los venezolanos si querían el modelo 
de Estado que él proponía. Es el único presidente de la historia de la 
humanidad en hacerlo. Y ganó con el 60 por ciento”.


Agregó: “Uno enciende la televisión venezolana y lo primero que ve es a 
miles de ‘periodistas’ diciendo que en Venezuela no hay libertad de 
expresión. Uno enciende la radio venezolana y hay miles de 
‘periodistas’, analistas, opositores de Chávez, diciendo que allí no hay 
libertad de expresión. Y uno abre el diario venezolano y hay un título 
enorme que dice: AQUÍ NO HAY LIBERTAD DE EXPRESIÓN.


“En los últimos cinco años tan sólo un medio de comunicación ha sido 
clausurado. Pero no fue clausurado por el gobierno de Chávez, sino por 
estos ‘demócratas’ (se refería a la derecha de Venezuela)… Extraña 
dictadura y extraños demócratas. Yo creo que en Venezuela hay un 
divorcio genial: el divorcio entre la realidad y la realidad virtual…”


Un año antes, en 2010, Galeano también habló sobre los medios de 
Venezuela al diario español El País. A pregunta expresa de ese diario 
sobre los “conflictos” de Chávez con la prensa, reflexionó:


“Hay una demonización de Chávez. Antes Cuba era la mala de la película, 
ahora ya no tanto. Pero siempre hay algún malo. Sin malo, la película no 
se puede hacer. Y si no hay gente peligrosa, ¿qué hacemos con los gastos 
militares? El mundo tiene que defenderse. El mundo tiene una economía de 
guerra funcionando y necesita enemigos. Si no existen, los fabrica. No 
siempre los diablos son diablos y los ángeles, ángeles”.



Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Eduardo Galeano Disavows His Book ‘The Open Veins’ - NYTimes.com

2014-05-23 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


On 5/23/14 8:40 PM, Ernestleif via Marxism wrote:

Open veins helped form me. As
Did USA. If it's true then I'll miss EG!


I was hasty. The Galeano interview supported Chavez. I misread his irony.

I read Open Veins in 1967, after joining the SWP. Around the same time I 
read Malcolm X's autobiography and John Gerassi's The Great Fear in 
Latin America. They were as formative as anything I would read by Marx 
et al.


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Eduardo Galeano Disavows His Book ‘The Open Veins’ - NYTimes.com

2014-05-23 Thread Brian via Marxism
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==



 


lord knows more kids
 today should be reading the USA trilogy!

 

 The Big Money by dos passos did it for me.

Brian McKenna

 

-Original Message-
From: Ernestleif via Marxism marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
To: Brian mckenna...@aol.com
Sent: Fri, May 23, 2014 8:40 pm
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Eduardo Galeano Disavows His Book ‘The Open Veins’ - 
NYTimes.com


==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Open veins helped form me. As
Did USA. If it's true then I'll miss EG!

Sent from my iPhone

 On May 23, 2014, at 8:13 PM, Andrew Pollack via Marxism 
 marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu 
wrote:
 
 ==
 Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
 ==
 
 
 were you being sarcastic Louis about him sounding like a contra? Admittedly
 I used googletranslate but it seems very clearly a critique by Galeano of
 the Venezuelan contras
 ps kudos to Michael for his quotes; let's hope Galeano hasn't gone down the
 Dos Passos road, but if so it's a very good parallel; lord knows more kids
 today should be reading the USA trilogy!
 
 
 2014-05-23 19:56 GMT-04:00 Louis Proyect via Marxism 
 marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu:
 
 ==
 Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
 ==
 
 
 On 5/23/14 7:38 PM, Louis Proyect via Marxism wrote:
 
 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/24/books/eduardo-galeano-
 disavows-his-book-the-open-veins.html
 
 Maybe Galeano now hates his book because Hugo Chavez recommended it (and
 helped increase MR's coffers.) In this interview he sounds like a
 Venezuelan contra:
 
 http://aristeguinoticias.com/0603/mundo/debate-por-hugo-
 chavez-mario-vargas-llosa-y-eduardo-galeano/
 
 En 2011, Galeano declaró en una entrevista en Montevideo que Chávez quizás
 era un dictador, pero “un dictador rarísimo” porque ganó varias elecciones
 limpias.
 
 “Hugo Chávez es un dictador, sin embargo, es un curioso dictador. Ganó
 ocho elecciones en cinco  años. Y ahora, recientemente, se sometió a un
 referéndum en el que preguntaba a los venezolanos si querían el modelo de
 Estado que él proponía. Es el único presidente de la historia de la
 humanidad en hacerlo. Y ganó con el 60 por ciento”.
 
 Agregó: “Uno enciende la televisión venezolana y lo primero que ve es a
 miles de ‘periodistas’ diciendo que en Venezuela no hay libertad de
 expresión. Uno enciende la radio venezolana y hay miles de ‘periodistas’,
 analistas, opositores de Chávez, diciendo que allí no hay libertad de
 expresión. Y uno abre el diario venezolano y hay un título enorme que dice:
 AQUÍ NO HAY LIBERTAD DE EXPRESIÓN.
 
 “En los últimos cinco años tan sólo un medio de comunicación ha sido
 clausurado. Pero no fue clausurado por el gobierno de Chávez, sino por
 estos ‘demócratas’ (se refería a la derecha de Venezuela)… Extraña
 dictadura y extraños demócratas. Yo creo que en Venezuela hay un divorcio
 genial: el divorcio entre la realidad y la realidad virtual…”
 
 Un año antes, en 2010, Galeano también habló sobre los medios de Venezuela
 al diario español El País. A pregunta expresa de ese diario sobre los
 “conflictos” de Chávez con la prensa, reflexionó:
 
 “Hay una demonización de Chávez. Antes Cuba era la mala de la película,
 ahora ya no tanto. Pero siempre hay algún malo. Sin malo, la película no se
 puede hacer. Y si no hay gente peligrosa, ¿qué hacemos con los gastos
 militares? El mundo tiene que defenderse. El mundo tiene una economía de
 guerra funcionando y necesita enemigos. Si no existen, los fabrica. No
 siempre los diablos son diablos y los ángeles, ángeles”.
 
 
 
 Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
 Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/
 options/marxism/acpollack2%40gmail.com
 
 Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
 Set your options at: 
 http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/ernestleif%40gmail.com


Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/mckenna193%40aol.com


 

Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Eduardo Galeano Disavows His Book ‘The Open Veins’ - NYTimes.com

2014-05-23 Thread michael yates via Marxism
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


Larry Rohter, the Times reporter who wrote this rather dumb article, was a 
Times correspondent in Venezuela. He vigorously attacked Oliver Stone's film, 
South of the Border, about Venezuela and Hugo Chavez. Stone replied in an 
rebuttal published here: 


http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/oliver_stone_responds_to_new_york_times_attack_20100628


Among Stone's comments were:


Rohter should have disclosed his own conflict of interest in this review. The 
film criticizes the New York Times for its editorial board’s endorsement of the 
military coup of April 11, 2002 against the democratically elected government 
of Venezuela, which was embarrassing to the Times. Moreover, Rohter himself 
wrote an article on April 12 that went even further than the Times’ endorsement 
of the coup:


“Neither the overthrow of Mr. Chavez, a former army colonel, nor of Mr. Mahuad 
two years ago can be classified as a conventional Latin American military coup. 
The armed forces did not actually take power on Thursday. It was the ousted 
president’s supporters who appear to have been responsible for deaths that 
numbered barely 12 rather than hundreds or thousands, and political rights and 
guarantees were restored rather than suspended.” – Larry Rohter, New York 
Times, April 12, 2002


These allegations that the coup was not a coup – not only by Rohter — prompted 
a rebuttal by Rohter’s colleague at the New York Times, Tim Weiner, who wrote a 
Sunday Week in Review piece two days later entitled “A Coup By Any Other Name.” 
(New York Times, April 14, 2002)


Unlike the NYT editorial board, which issued a grudging retraction of their 
pro-coup stance a few days later (included in our film), Rohter seems to have 
clung to the right-wing fantasies about the coup. It is not surprising that 
someone who supports the military overthrow of a democratically elected 
government would not like a documentary like this one, which celebrates the 
triumphs of electoral democracy in South America over the last decade.


During our phone conversation, Rohter got more agitated as I steadfastly 
refused to concede anything about what Open Veins tells us about Latin 
America's history. He seemed to think that MR Press is obliged to make note of 
Galiano's remarks, but I said that would be ridiculous. Should we put a blurb 
on the book, stating that the author has now repudiated his book (which, by the 
way, he did not)? I asked him, what publisher would do that, especially when we 
think the book is right on the money.

Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com