Re: [Marxism] Review of Sean Wilentz's biography of Andrew Jackson

2019-12-24 Thread Andrew Pollack via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

In contrast, if I remember right, Schlesinger added a preface to his own
Jackson bio apologizing for not taking on the anti-indigenous character of
Jackson's politics in his original edition.
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Marxism] Review of Sean Wilentz's biography of Andrew Jackson

2019-12-23 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

(Wilentz apparently wrote the letter that was signed by 4 other 
historians excoriating the NYT's Project 1619. I am not surprised that 
sectarian shitheads at WSWS would find him amenable to their designs.)


NLR 42, NOV DEC 2006
WHITEWASHING JACKSON
by TOM MERTES

Sean Wilentz, Andrew Jackson
Henry Holt: New York 2005

Reviewing the wave of political upheavals around 1830 that overthrew the 
Bourbons in France, detached Belgium from the Netherlands, secured 
Catholic emancipation to Ireland, brought the Reform Bill to England and 
unleashed civil wars in Spain and Portugal, in his Age of Revolution 
Eric Hobsbawm saw the most radical popular advance of the time in the 
election of Andrew Jackson as President of the United States. Viewed 
comparatively, two landmarks of his presidency stand out. The electorate 
of 1828 that put Jackson into power, with a record 56 per cent of the 
vote, was by far the largest in history: over a million strong, it was 
three times the size of the American turnout in 1824. The mobilization 
that produced this majority, moreover, was the work of the first modern 
mass political party. The second development was more original than the 
first, but together they spelt a lasting transformation of American 
democracy, of whose importance posterity has never doubted. The 
reputation of the man personifying this change remains far more 
contested. In his own day, Jackson was hailed by many as a heroic 
democrat, the beau ideal of a self-made man who rose to the nation’s 
highest post as a foe of social privilege and slayer of the ‘monster 
bank’, saviour of the nation and fearless champion of the people. Others 
saw him as ‘King Andrew’, a divisive tyrant driven by petty personal 
prejudices, contemptuous of the law of the land and merciless to the 
weak, who debauched government with a spoils system and destroyed the 
nation’s prosperity with a fixation on hard money.


The facts of Jackson’s career are stark enough. He was born in 1767 of 
poor Scots-Irish parents, immigrants from Ulster, in the former lands of 
the Catawba peoples, where North and South Carolina meet—an area well 
known for its opposition to the eastern elites. At the age of fourteen, 
he served the insurgents against George iii. Captured by the British, he 
was slashed with a sword-blow by an officer, leaving a declivity in his 
skull for which Jackson never forgave them. For the rest of his life, he 
continued to believe that they wanted to retake the continent. Becoming 
increasingly obstreperous after his mother’s death soon afterwards, he 
frittered away a sudden inheritance from a grandfather in Ireland, but 
learned enough law to get himself appointed by a drinking companion as a 
prosecutor in the frontier zone of Tennessee—not yet a state—at the age 
of twenty-one. En route to Tennessee, he purchased his first woman 
slave. Like many later ambitious presidents, he then moved up the social 
and political ladder through marriage to the daughter of a state 
surveyor and land speculator. Jackson rose swiftly on the frontier as a 
cotton planter, speculator and slave trader. In his early thirties, he 
became Tennessee’s first Congressman, and a year later was briefly 
Senator, before quitting for a lucrative job as a circuit judge back home.


However, Jackson’s real political breakthrough came from the camp, not 
the courtroom. A trigger-happy brawler, duellist and warmonger, who had 
long itched for military command, he got his chance in 1812, when war 
broke out with Britain. Ordered south by Madison to block any danger of 
Indian insurgents linking up with British forces or the Spanish in 
Florida, he crushed a small Creek rising, unleashing a proverbial hatred 
for the enemy with an exemplary massacre, and was allowed to dictate 
terms of surrender that confiscated more than half of Creek 
lands—territory covering most of today’s Alabama and a sizeable part of 
Georgia—regardless of whether or not the population had fought against 
him. Soon afterwards, Jackson cemented his military fame with a 
successful defence of New Orleans against an assault by British 
regulars, a battle fought—unknown to both sides—as the ink was already 
dry on the Treaty of Ghent that concluded the war. Nonetheless, he was 
widely feted as a second Washington, who had saved the nation—after the 
humiliation of the torching of the White House by Admiral Cockburn’s 
forces—in its second ordeal against Britain.


Now a full General, and appointed the us military commander in the 
South, Jackson made sure he stayed in the limelight with a series of 
annexations and lunges beyond the Union’s borders. In these