Re: [Marxism] Some thoughts on Michael Brown the Law in St. Louis

2014-08-24 Thread waistline via Marxism
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==








Clay Clairborne’s blog comments, “Some thoughts on Michael Brown  the Law in 
St. Louis,” recall his life as a young black male living in St. Louis between 
1966 – 1975. 
http://claysbeach.blogspot.com/2014/08/some-thoughts-on-michael-brown-law-in.html

Clay’s story of police harassment is pretty standard stuff in the life of black 
men in America. Every encounter with the police threatens to become a life and 
death issue, which is why many young men run from the police knowing they 
cannot outrun a bullet. The system of murder of the black males is carved into 
the architecture of the superstructure. However one accounts for this system of 
murder of black men, the system itself is justified by white racial ideology. 
Even as this system survived one stage of development after another, something 
profound changed in the life of our country and indeed the world since Clay’s 
recollection of 1966 – 1975.  

America today is post Jim Crow segregation. Jim Crow segregation was overturned 
between 1966 and 1975. It was the legal system of segregation that held the 
black masses together, monitoring and restricting their movement in society. 
All classes of blacks were segregated based on state violence, more or less 
supported by the white population in general. 

I remember this period of history in Detroit, Michigan. The mini-riot 
(Kercheval Incident) occurred in 1966, almost one year to the date from the 
August 11, 1965 Watts rebellion and one year before the Detroit 1967 rebellion. 
 http://www.detroits-great-rebellion.com/Kercheval---1966.html

At that time, Detroit July 1967 was the greatest uprising against the state 
since the Civil War. 

The period 1966-1975 was one of reform and the winning of concessions 
worldwide. Marxist Glossary defines reform, reformism and concessions. Reform 
is change in a system which does not change its essential quality and 
characteristic. Reform is change within and between classes without changing 
the property relations. Concession is winning of a benefit that does not reform 
the system. For instance, winning a .50 cent raise or a week vacation is a 
concession. Winning legal status for industrial unionism and fair housing are 
reforms because the relations within and between classes is reformed without 
changing property relations. In America reforms generally (more often than not) 
require Supreme Court rulings for implementation. 
http://www.amazon.com/Marxist-Glossary-Expanded-Twenty-First-Narrative/dp/1499145500

Neocolonialism was the reform dismantling Europe’s direct colonial system 
opening the door for post WW II American financial imperialism. The last phase 
of neo-colonialism was unfolding during the period 1966 – 1975.  The victory of 
the Vietnamese revolution and the 1976 unification of Vietnam is a historical 
bookmark. The neocolonial state peaks and begins decline. The ascendency of the 
new nonbanking financial architecture takes place, culminating in the 
domination of speculative finance over the world total capital. Computerization 
and robotics qualitatively restructure the environment of bourgeois commodity 
production.

Our Marxist philosophy informs us that change takes place a certain way. A 
qualitative change in the environment of something (the value producing system 
that is capitalism) sets the conditions for change in the something, inasmuch 
as one thing is the environment for other things. Behind this gibberish is the 
law of causality. Causality is why things change, while dialectics refer to how 
things change. 

Now, history informs us that causality opens the door and makes things 
possible. It does not make things happen. Making things happen is the job of 
humanity, conscious revolutionaries and organizations. Further, causality makes 
some things possible and other things impossible. 

When the last waves of rebellions swept America in the 1960s throughout the 
1970s, definitively ending in the early 1980s in Tampa and Liberty city 
Florida, reform of the system was still possible.  Throughout the 1980s the new 
non-banking financial system came into being, and became dominate during the 
1990s ushering in the struggle against globalism and Seattle 1999. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Seattle_WTO_protests

Today there are no more reforms left in capitalism, because that, which was 
fundamental to the systems rise and development has qualitatively changed. 
Capitalism achieved dominance as a mode of production based on the industrial 
revolution. The industrial revolution has ended and now the robotic revolution, 
based on the semiconductor, is underway. 

The semiconductor based system of computers and robotics are qualitatively new 
means of production. Once a qualitatively new system of productive 

[Marxism] Some thoughts on Michael Brown the Law in St. Louis

2014-08-23 Thread Clay Claiborne via Marxism

==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==


New from Linux Beach:


 Some thoughts on Michael Brown  the Law in St. Louis
 
http://claysbeach.blogspot.com/2014/08/some-thoughts-on-michael-brown-law-in.html

I've been busy in San Antonio this week learning a new job so I 
haven't had time for blogging. Haven't had time for much of anything 
else. That doesn't mean my heart hasn't been with the protesters in 
Ferguson, especially since I have my own history with St. Louis law 
enforcement. Now comes the weekend, which suddenly has new meaning for 
me, like time to write a blog.


Before I get to my own experiences, I have a few words for the media, 
especially CNN. I'm working second shift and I have been catching 
their late night coverage from my Home2 @ the Hilton:


What you don't seem to get is that it isn't particularly about what 
Michael Brown did or whether Officer Darren Wilson was justified in 
killing him. Its about a culture in this country that pre-dates the 
United States that says a white law enforcement officer is /always/ 
justified in gunning down a black man and the lack of evidence, with 
each new /Michael Brown,/ that that has changed or ever will change. 
Honestly, I don't know whether Darren Brown is guilty of murder, but I 
know they can't all be innocent and I know they all get off. I was in 
Los Angeles when the verdict came down in the Rodney King case. The 
video tape made no difference. When's the last time a white cop went 
to jail for killing a black person? Hence the rage.


*More...* 
http://claysbeach.blogspot.com/2014/08/some-thoughts-on-michael-brown-law-in.html




Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com