==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Do you mean just the FRB/Treasury programs and the FDIC's Temporary Loan
Guarantee
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
At 09:14 25/11/09 -0500, Louis Proyect wrote:
http://chronicle.com/section/Home/5
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
In a paper posted recently on the online journal Evolutionary Psychology,
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Paula wrote:
He also scored countries on their degree of religiosity, as
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Jonathan Gruber is a health economist from MIT -- an expert, no doubt.
David
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
For the last 40 years Chrysler share of the US auto market hovered between
11 and
Thanks CJ,
I'll take a look.
I'm not an expert, but from my experience, cats are less responsive to
word symbols than dogs. Note that even dogs can learn a small number
of symbols. They respond to their names.
On 11/24/09, CeJ jann...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey CB, you might find this article
It is my understanding that
dogs can understand up to several
hundred words. They are also excellent
readers of human body language.
Jim F.
-- Original Message --
From: c b cb31...@gmail.com
To: Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx and the
thinkers
Urgent call for more jobs gains momentum
EPI News - November 24, 2009
http://www.epi-data.org/epinews/epinews20091124.html
EPI's urgent call for more jobs gains momentum
EPI has joined forces with a coalition of national
organizations in calling for more action to create
jobs. On November 17,
CeJ jannuzi
I would say HH and FDR were birds of a capitalist feather. FDR ran on
a campaign that criticized Hoover for his profligate spending, the
result of budget
increases that resulted in high deficits (at least up until that
time), and his tax increases. In practice, both HH and FDR
Finally, hey it's almost time to organize to get Obama re-elected. I
know what he can run on: Don't let all our good work go unfinished.
CJ
^^^
CB: And don't forget : Palin is a fascist. ( no smiley face; pace
Trotskyists' analysis)
___
CJ, have you studied Vygotsky ? He seems to be the most Marxoid of all
the famous linguists.
Oh I didn't send the Blunden essays on Vygotsky. Very interesting and
Marxist development of the relationship between thought and language
Vygotsky and the Dialectical Method
On his return to activity, the group began to work their way through
all the theories of psychology which were contesting the field on the
world stage: Freud, Piaget, James, ... critiquing them and
appropriating the insights each had to offer. The group worked
collaboratively, discussing the
Ilyenkov’s most widely noted contribution was his study of the ideal,
of how ideals come into being as perfectly material cultural products,
the archetype of which is money. His study of Capital, “The Abstract
and Concrete in Marx’s Capital” is a masterpiece. Ilyenkov gained a
formidable
In an old Marxmail post, I drew a connection
between the debates that took place in
the 1920s between the Soviet Mechanists
and Deborinists and the later debates
in Soviet philosophy and psychology,
as exemplified in the work of Ilyenkov.
See:
http://tinyurl.com/djbre
Jim Farmelant
--
JFIt is my understanding that
dogs can understand up to several
hundred words. They are also excellent
readers of human body language.
Yes, and the reason why so many humans get bit is that humans are not
very good readers of canine body language. There is a theory out of
Africa, Australia and
Objective spirit might be interpreted materialisitically as
culture, custom, tradition, systems of ideas shared by peoples.
Spirit not as a wispy , non-material whatever , nor as a disembodied
ghost, nor The Idea as a demiurge, but as shared ideas in many
peoples' brains. On the Levi-Strauss
CJ, have you studied Vygotsky ? He seems to be the most Marxoid of all
the famous linguists.
Back in the 80s it was quite common to cite:
1. Vygotsky in education and education psychology
2. Bakhtin in literary criticism
3. Elkonen (? unsure of romanization now) in 'reading science'.
All
See this, if you are interested in Vygotsky and/or Piaget:
http://www.marxists.org/archive/elkonin/works/1971/stages.htm
Wish they had more by him!
CJ
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or
http://www.marxists.org/subject/psychology/index.htm
Going to this section of the the mo site, it's interesting to track
down and compare Vygotsky on 'crisis of psychology' with Husserl on
the subject. Husserl wrote a book about the topic.
CJ
___
Reading across Vygotsky, Elkonin, Merleau-Ponty and Husserl on
psychological topics and concepts is an education in itself. M-P was a
Marxist.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/merleau-ponty/
http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/merleaup.htm
Not being able to download the article I would appreciate being sent the
password. Thanks!
__
Od: CeJ
Komu: marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
Datum: 26.11.2009 03:33
Předmět: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis]Foucault’s Discursive Subject by
22 matches
Mail list logo
