Oh come on, Shane. You sound like a cranky alter-cocker. We read the
Grundrisse for the same reason we read the economic-philosophic manuscripts,
the Theories of Surplus Value, the German Ideology, the 18th Brumaire,
etc.-- for the same reason we read Beethoven's sketchbooks; because it gives
I guess that means I better read the book. OK, give me a few days.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Perelman mich...@ecst.csuchico.edu
To: David Schanoes sartes...@earthlink.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] K2 study guide
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at
This is the point where the discussion becomes more than inane; it becomes
downright oppressive.
We go from arguing that Russia wanted to keep Germany intact and was trying
to make a class, or semi-class distinction, between the people and the
fascists; to arguing about whether or not rape was
Geez you are an insufferable moron. A claim was made and utilized, as an
excuse, a rationalization for rape that EVERY Red Army soldier had lost a
relative to rape or some other barbaric practice.
Every. That was the claim. I don't remember you asking for any
documentation of the every.
Indeed, Loren was invited to by the workers to speak during the first days
of the occupation.
Those interested can hear an interview on Pacifica with Loren re events in
Korea at:
http://www.suziweissman.com
- Original Message -
From: Bill O'Connor bill...@gmail.com
To:
Sartesian:
The central issue for me in the previous round of discussions is those
notions that: somehow dialectic means that there is positive and
negative in everything;
Reply:
Correct. Well done. Finally you get it.
Reply to the reply: Obviously, you're an idiot. Oh yes, positive
I understand that you think such assessments are overstated. It's one thing
to say that. It's another to show it.
This is not at all comparable to somebody leaving the door unlocked. This
is
not some piece of forgetfulness that allows a nightcrawler to sneak into
the house. The role played
One thing you have certainly mastered, never answer a concrete question.
The emancipatory, progressive, element in capitalism is not the dual
role of the bourgeoisie as Marx imagined, and only imagined, it to be in
1848,[ as a careful examination of the struggle against the ancien regime
and
Follow the money. Who's bankrolling her? Bet it's the Mellons.
- Original Message -
From: Louis Proyect l...@panix.com
To: sartes...@earthlink.net
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 8:07 AM
Subject: [Marxism] Queen of the birthers
J does a masterful job of not providing answers to the questions that I
asked. Instead we get an explanation of dialectics. But what J offers
has nothing to do with dialectics as expounded by Hegel in the Science of
Logic, or as demonstrated by Marx in Capital.
And what constitutes the core of
Bottom line: IMO, we oppose the military, economic, financial ventures of
the advanced capitalist countries in the less capitalistically developed
countries. That doesn't mean we support the governments, the policies, or
any particular group in those less capitalistically developed countries.
From the Fed's Beige Book:
Prepared at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and based on information
collected on or before July 20, 2009. This document summarizes comments
received from business and other contacts outside the Federal Reserve and is
not a commentary on the views of Federal
601 - 612 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
