Re: [Marxism] [microsound] More idiocy at Counterpunch

2010-01-08 Thread Jeffrey Thomas Piercy
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == nada wrote: > But the idea that this is 'mutilation' is *insulting* to the real > *

Re: [Marxism] [microsound] More idiocy at Counterpunch

2010-01-07 Thread Jay Clinton
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == The idea that callling it mutilation is "insulting" says something about homo sapie

Re: [Marxism] [microsound] More idiocy at Counterpunch

2010-01-07 Thread Jay Clinton
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Sorry, I think i misunderstood your point. Yes, I think many more egregious forms o

Re: [Marxism] [microsound] More idiocy at Counterpunch

2010-01-07 Thread Jay Clinton
uld not do in any case, since many forms of female circumcision are in fact more egregious. But both are genital mutilation. --- On Fri, 8/1/10, Adam Richmond wrote: From: Adam Richmond Subject: Re: [Marxism] [microsound] More idiocy at Counterpunch To: "jc" Date: Friday, 8

Re: [Marxism] [microsound] More idiocy at Counterpunch

2010-01-07 Thread New Tet
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Jay Clinton wrote: > > Circumcision is genital mutilation, and to call it anti-s

Re: [Marxism] [microsound] More idiocy at Counterpunch

2010-01-07 Thread New Tet
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Adam Richmond wrote: > > > She may shroud herself with some free flowing public

Re: [Marxism] [microsound] More idiocy at Counterpunch

2010-01-04 Thread New Tet
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Louis Proyect wrote: > > From the article: > > "Male circumcision slices off 5-