The reviewer is quoting text from the Richmond exhibit. It's not explicitly clear that his is endorsing those views, just showing the contrast between how the two exhibits dealt with Brown.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Andrew Pollack <acpolla...@gmail.com>wrote: > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/arts/design/28brown.html?ref=arts > The review itself is reactionary -- lumping Brown in with the Oklahoma > City bombers! -- but the article has some good links to exhibit > samples. > > ________________________________________________ YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
