==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
==
Rule #1: YOU
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Repeat?
Send list submissions to:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
A play on Katy Perry's hit song:
===
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
===
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:07 AM, joel cosgrove joel.cosgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hilarious.
Greg, how does
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
My take is just the reverse-- you can't understand Hegel unless you've read
Marx.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
guava tree escribió:
do people think reading volumes 23 of Capital is more
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
And I would say skip the Lenin, read the Grundrisse, vols 2,3, and the economic
Because the bourgeosie has granted the masses Google.
http://www.google.com/search?client=operarls=enq=David+Harvey+capitalsourceid=operaie=utf-8oe=utf-8
http://davidharvey.org/
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jeffrey Thomas Piercy mqd...@mqduck.netwrote:
Ralph Johansen wrote:
David Harvey,
On Aug 24, 2009, at 1:15 AM, Horse Badorties wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:51 PM, guava tree theguavat...@gmail.com
wrote:
do people think reading volumes 23 of Capital is more valuable than
reading the Grundrisse?
The Grundrisse is like the I Ching. It's not meant to be read from
guava tree theguavat...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Ralph Johansen
mdriscol...@charter.netwrote:
I'm now reading
volume 2 for the first time, using the online MIA study guide which,
while its authors recommended it for group study, seems useful for
individual
seriously, I mean, for example, what are securitized mortgages? how does your
mortgage get bundled and sold and traded en masse with others? For years we
heard about derivatives without ever hearing-as with hedge funds any
explanation of what they exactly were-aside from glib comments of
do people think reading volumes 23 of Capital is more valuable than reading
the Grundrisse? Or-- is one's time better spent reading Lenin, or even Hegel
than moving into books Marx didn't have the time to put his finishing
touches on?
My guess is that people here will not be big on reading
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:51 PM, guava tree theguavat...@gmail.com wrote:
do people think reading volumes 23 of Capital is more valuable than
reading the Grundrisse?
The Grundrisse is like the I Ching. It's not meant to be read from beginning to
end;
it's meant to be opened at random and
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5e61e20c-0f44-11de-ba10-779fd2ac,dwp_uuid=ae1104cc-f82e-11dd-aae8-77b07658.html
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
14 matches
Mail list logo
