Re: [Marxism] Egypt yet again
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I would love it if Gary was right. I am afraid, however, we don´t have our Kerensky. We have our Corazón Aquino. 2011/1/27 Gary MacLennan gary.maclenn...@gmail.com: Apologies to comrades for banging on about Egypt, but truly I feel it is the key to the downfall of the American Empire. What has cheered me up is firstly the collapse in the Egyptian stock exchange and secondly ElBaradei's declaration that he will return to Cairo. s/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Egypt yet again
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2011/1/27 Gary MacLennan gary.maclenn...@gmail.com: Let us hope that the reluctance of the ElBaradei types means that they will struggle to get control of what looks increasingly like an uprising. the regime is in trouble and I interpret the ElBaradei maneuver as a fall back strategy by the Egyptian ruling class. I fully agree in your interpretation. What I tend to take in account -harsh experience along decades of political struggle in a semicolonial country- is that any comparison with the Russian Revolution must take into account the relative strengths of the local power and imperialism. Even Tsardom was stronger vis à vis the powers of those times than any semicolonial government today. In THIS sense, both Kerensky and the Bolsheviks acted in a different scenario than that of their eventual counterparts in Egypt. A yes, I am a bore, but there is the Arab national question at stake (please take capitals as italics): ONLY IN EGYPT? WOULD IT NOT BE LIKE A BOLSH REV CONSTRAINED TO THE MOSCOW REGION? While in Tsarist Russia the national question turned around the right to break away, in the Arab case the national question as well as in Latin America turns around the right to unite. Egypt is in this sense the Brazil of the Arab world. Nothing less, but NOTHING MORE. Think of the imperialist policy makers in this context... Relinquish Brazil only because some thousands have taken the streets? Relinquish Egypt for same reason? I don´t see the Washington policy makers even thinking of that alternative. Out of all this turmoil a side effect that I expect will be a return to the State Dept of the discarded Arabists to replace the Zionist ignorami. This line of thought is really interesting, and IMHO the best we can expect to happen now. Hope you are right. But it will be too late Hope you are right, again... Best. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Why Tunisia's Revolution Is Islamist-Free
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == If the working class gets isolated, we are in trouble. 2011/1/18 DW dwalters...@gmail.com: The NYT piece posted by Louis notes that the middleclass has withdrawn some from the protests...replaced by more working class demonstrators. David -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Similarities between Iranian and Tunisian revolts cannot be ignored
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I am trying to give my help from my workplace. But if a lesson is to be learnt, comrades, it is that no revolution can be fuieled from abroad. We all hope that the Tunisian insurrection has replies the Arab world over (but how will things evolve?) but I am afraid that there is little we can do to help. Unless we go there, choose a political group we consider similar to our views, and humbly offer our backs to hold the heavy load of the grey everyday task of making a revolution. 2011/1/16 Manuel Barrera mtom...@hotmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Greg said: The writer of this piece is a frequent commentator on Middle East. Unfortunately, Saikal, almost buries his most important observation: Ben Ali's overthrow may inject new energy into opposition forces across the Arab world. Egypt is most vulnerable. The clear promise of Tunisia is in the chance that the Arab people's will indeed follow suit throughout the diaspora. These events have the potential not only to inject new energy but to reinvigorate the mass movements that grew just two years ago in Iran and bring new hope to the Palestinian Intifada. What would be of significant importance is if the Latin American leaderships were to extend their hands to the Tunisian peoples and bring a widespread wave of solidarity. Comrades on this list, especially in the areas of recent mobilization (France, U.K., la América Latina?) have unique opportunities now. It will be interesting and hopeful to see if Cuba will reach out. For all the rest of us--Solidarity! Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Uri Avnery about Greater Libanon and Greater Israel
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2011/1/17 Lüko Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.de: Avnery is a permanent nuisance to the Zionist establishment, a thorn in their flesh. One of the internal contradictions of Zionism, this colonial adventure which has turned Palestine into the most dangerous place a Jew can live. The very idea that there can be an Israeli nationality is, whether Avneri knows this or not, a torpedo against the Zionist theses. That is what, IMHO, Arafat saw so clearly. It is not important, for the time being, whether Avnery wants the expelled Arabs to remain outside Israel or not. In fact, if equal citizenship were awarded to every Israeli SUBJECT (not citizen in the French Revolution, that is fully bourgeois, political sense), sooner or later there would be a majority of Arab citizens, and then -end of story. It is not a matter of chance that Avnery began his political carreer during the first half of the 60s by suggesting the Canaanite option EXACTLY AT THE SAME TIME when Ben Gurion expressed fears that Israel would Orientalize itself, e.g. end assimilated to its neighbors. I always cherish the Austro Hungarian example on these issues, among other reasons because Hertzl´s solution to the Jewish problem in Europe was tailored exactly in the Austro Hungarian model. What would have happened to that Empire if one day EVERY CITIZEN IN THE EMPIRE HAD BEEN CONSIDERED JUST THAT, AN AHE CITIZEN AND NOT A SUBJECT OF ONE OF THE MANY NATIONALITIES THAT FORMED IT? It would have dissolved into nothingness. And of course if the AHE had had the time, then the Eastern nationalities, a majority in the population, would have drowned the German nationality in an ocean of Oriental peasantry-based new national AHE bourgeoisie as against German aristocrats of Imperial privilege. Actually, the interesting piece in my previous contribution is what Avnery tells about the history of the sectarian setup of Libanon, which is -- in my opinion -- really worth reading. Cheers, Lüko Willms Frankfurt, Germany visit http://www.mlwerke.de Marx, Engels, Luxemburg, Lenin, Trotzki in German Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Hochschild on Lumumba
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Any known relation between this Adam Hochschild and the Hochschild family who, togeher with Aramayo and Patiño, were known as the Bolivian Barons of Tin and ran what was also known as the Super State of the mining companies? 2011/1/17 Jim Farmelant farmela...@juno.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Yesterday was the 50th anniversary of his assassination: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/17/opinion/17hochschild.html Jim Farmelant http://independent.academia.edu/JimFarmelant www.foxymath.com Learn or Review Basic Math Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4d34609cd8af2c0f29fst03vuc Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Why Tunisia's Revolution Is Islamist-Free
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == You can weight the importance of an-Nahda by observing that, contrary to what happens almost everywhere outside Tunisia, they need to reach agreements with the secular opposition to have some impact in Tunisian politics. And I think (as I feel I have already stated) that were it not for the fact that the Islamicists are weak, the Army might not have stood in defense of the popular revolts against the thugs of the regime. 2011/1/17 Dan d.koech...@wanadoo.fr: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Sorry, this is my 6th message and I'm over the limit, but I've received a lot of messages off-list. OK. The Islamic organization An-Nahda still exists in certain rural regions of Tunisia. It has survived a very brutal government crackdown (To what extent? Has it been completely infiltrated by the mukhabarat ?) Recently it has led protests in towns and villages. OK. In large urban centres, the TCP-W (Tunisian Communist Workers' Party) has also had some influence and has been trying to organize. OK. Ben ALi is gone. Free and fair elections will be held over the coming months (or so it seems). I stand corrected. An-Nahda is still present in the countryside. So the revolution is not Islamist-free. But what weight does An-Nahda really have ? Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Poll data on IRELAND 2011 General Election????
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Could someone give me the results of the following polls? 2011/1/10 Ratbag Media ratbagra...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Kieran took up the popular mass media question “Why are the Irish Not Protesting”? - he argued voters are “waiting in the long grass” for Fianna Fáil Link : http://politicalreform.ie/2011/01/07/redcpaddypowerpoll7jan2011/ and that the leaders of the Trade Unions and Labour Leader Éamlonn Gilmore are trying to damp down the expectations of an angry people. A series of opinion polls have shown that a left force which will not sell out could win 5 to 7 TD’s (Teachtaí Dála) in the General Election likely to be held in march 2011. The ULA needs to make this step forward, and then proceed towards forming a new working class party, that includes a number of tendencies or platforms. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Algerian and Tunisian riots
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == However right Dan may be (or not), the hard fact is that Ismail´s point is THE point at stake when it comes to imperialist media coverage of both Iran and Morocco. If a fly is killed in a car running along a lonely countryside road in Iran by a government official, be sure a wave of outraged acrimony will swamp the media. If a couple dozens Moroccan workers are slaughtered by a government official in the main square of Marrakech, a couple of lines at most will mark their global obituary. This should be telling something, I think, Daniel. Unless, of course, we believe imperialism ceased to exist. 2011/1/10 Dan d.koech...@wanadoo.fr: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == If this were happening in Iran, it would be in the news incessantly, with much finger-wagging against the repressive regime. Because it's happening in two of the sclerotic despotisms the West supports (not least as allies in the war on terror), it barely registers. Well, it don't matter mister whether it is the Iranian regime keeping the unemployed in line in Teheran with bullets or the Tunisian regime doing the same with CIA-backing, or the French, or the US regime for that matter. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Lula´s achievements
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Carlos Eduardo R. (BTW, please LEARN PORTUGUESE, get and read his book on Trotsky and real socialism, it is EXCEPTIONAL!) sums up the Lula period as: Primo, a more or less universal welfare dole – that had attracted millions of cronically unemployed and excluded out of the rackteering networks of social assistance kept by bourgeois politicians into working-class electoral politics; secundo, an empowerment of Brazil as an international force commited to the advocacy of the “right of peoples to dispose of themselves” viz., in the Iran low-grade uranium deal and in recognizal of the Palestinian state in its 1967 borders; tertio, Lula’ person as such, as the meaning of a former lathe-worker with a solely tradeunionist, working-class politics background was (and is) an ideological shock to a very, very reactionary ruling class. Whoever does not understand the IMMENSE social and political impact of points one and three should certainly NOT dare speak of Brazil. There is a mythical idea that all of Brazil has become a modern, integrated, dynamic economy more or less as if South Korea had swollen itself up to 8 million sq km and 200 million people. There is also a mythical idea that the Brazilian ruling class is as reactionary as, say, the German bourgeoisie. Whoever keeps stuck to such BS shibboleths should follow the method of Marx or Lenin, sit down with reams and reams of printed matter on Braz literature, history and economy, try to read all of it, understand it, and then very humbly begin to beg to be listened to. The deep reactionarism of the Br ruling classes came to the fore in 1964, when even hard-boiled Leftists were amazed at the display of sheer unhumanism and medieval social attitudes that mobilized social support to the coup. And unless you understand that for tens of millions in Brazil depended on the modest welfare dole by Lula meant a first, modest but real, introduction to the human species (yes!) you cannot understand Brazil. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Spa] Irish worker priest victim of the 1976 regime remembered in Argentina
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Source: http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/elpais/1-158257-2010-12-07.html Homenaje a Patrick Rice Organismos de derechos humanos, familiares y amigos realizarán hoy, a las 16, un homenaje a Patrick Rice, un ex cura obrero irlandés y “militante de la vida” que también sufrió los horrores de la dictadura como detenido-desaparecido. El mismo se realizará en donde funcionó la capilla de la ex Esma, donde los capellanes de la Iglesia Católica bendecían las acciones y a los miembros de los escuadrones de la muerte de la Armada. A cinco meses de su fallecimiento, ese lugar pasará a llamarse a partir de hoy “Espacio Patrick Rice”. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Formal correction :-)
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/12/5 DW dwalters...@gmail.com: Nestor is, formally, correct. I was projecting. However, we are, and have been for a decade or more, in something of a 'transitional' phase for many of these Brazil-like economies. S. Korea stands out, as well, China, in it's own way, for sure, that are beginning to behave a little like Imperialist countries, most notably in their export of capital. It would be soothing to be concretely correct! :-) Now, serious: capital export is but one of the elements to decide whether we are confronting an imperialist country, or not. Manuel Ugarte, a non-Marxist Arg socialist (but a man who, when representing the Arg Socs in a Congress of the 2nd International supported Lenin´s positions on the colonial question against that held up by, among others, many Dutch Marxists), summed it up in a desperate way in relation to the stupid war games played by many South American countries (not NATIONS) of his time: Ridiculous Prussias that import their guns. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Manuel Ugarte on imperialism and industrial growth in non-core countries
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Sorry, can´t translate. But this late writing by Manuel Ugarte shows why a non-Marxist can understand imperialism better than many self-appointed (and anointed) Marxists: Industria propia o extranjera De: La reconstrucción de Hispanoamérica (póstuma) 1961. Mientras falte la industria pesada no podremos tener verdadero ejército, porque comprar armamentos equivale a moverse en la órbita de rotaciones extrañas. Sólo se obtiene cuando la finalidad perseguida favorece las intenciones de la nación que los facilita. Si no construimos locomotoras, tampoco existirán ferrocarriles de pura esencia nacional. Por otra parte, la fachada no nos ha de engañar. No basta que las fábricas se instalen en nuestros territorios para que resulten nuestras realmente. Pueden representar, en cierto caso, una habilidad de la industria extranjera para evitar fletes onerosos o recias tarifas de aduana. Pueden recibir los objetos a medio manufacturar. Porque es dudoso que el capitalismo que impone al mundo su producción nos provea de instrumentos para hacerle competencia renunciando a los beneficios que hasta ahora percibe y a clientela creciente en el porvenir. La creación de filiales con nombres adaptados a la región no es un comienzo de libertad, sino una confirmación de tutela. Casos recientes permiten observar cómo puede surgir una empresa en Iberoamérica. Un grupo oligarco-plutocrático se pone en contacto con una gran entidad de Inglaterra o de Estados Unidos o, lo que es más frecuente, la entidad extranjera busca en una de nuestras repúblicas al grupo que debe secundarla. No falta el banco, sociedad de fomentoo lo que sea de la república en cuestión que facilite para el negocio cincuenta millones. La corporación extranjera se inscribe con veinte millones que resultarán nominales, después diremos por qué. El público de la república iberoamericana puede llegar a suscribir en acciones otros veinte millones. Son pues noventa millones de pesos que van a ser administrados por un extranjero, jefe invariable de la empresa. El primer acto de la nueva compañía consistirá en comprar maquinarias en Estados Unidos o Inglaterra, maquinaria por la cual se pagarán cincuenta millones de pesos. De suerte que los veinte millones que suscribió la firma siempre quedarán fuera de iberoarnérica, más los treinta millones que salen para completar los cincuenta, valor de la maquinaria, cuyo modelo ha sido a menudo sobrepasado en el país de origen por otras más recientes. La ganancia para los de afuera es siempre segura. Si hay albur (riesgo), pasará sobre la república iberoamericana. Así suelen fundarse, con ostentosos nombres locales, algunas fábricas que nos dan la ilusión de tener industrias y que sólo constituyen nuevos canales de absorción. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Aurelio Bujaldón, el enólogo d e la lista] El mejor malbec y algo más.
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == [Cometo la infidencia de relatar en público estas dulzuras de la vida que Aurelio nos ha transmitido en privado a algunos de sus amigos. Más que nada pa que trinen los de ajuera. Solo eliminé una línea que obviamente se destinaba a los elegidos y no es pa tuitos.] Estimados, Se va cerrando el 2010 y ahora que hago el racconto de lo que ha sido este año, veo que hice algunas salidas este año, que me depararon gratas sorpresas vinculadas. Menos cháchara y vamos al grano: En Semana Chanta cuando estuve en Ascochinga, me mandé hasta la Colonia Caroya y pude apreciar que el frambua local es un muy rico tinto para acompañar una picada, especialmente de delicias igualmente caroyenses: los quesos y salames con gusto bien a campo. Todo redondeado con un pan casero y a cortarse las venas. Aguanten entonces, la Caroya, las picadas y los vinos cordobeses! En Octubre por el valle Calchaquí, pude apreciar, A) Por un lado que la Ruta 40 es la nueva columna vertebral - o vena central - de los nuevos vinos argentinos; que están llegando y por llegar: a las bodegas ya presentes del norte catamarqueño y salteño se agregan ahora las de ... Tucumán y Jujuy !!! Sí señor: En Amaicha y Colalao ya se yerguen las salas que alojan última tecnología en elaboración y almacenaje de bodegas novísimas, de donde saldrán los blancos y tintos tucumanos. Ni hablar del bruto emprendimiento francés Colomé, en un valle perdido al Oeste de Molinos (sur de Cachi). ...Cosa de locos. Y hasta Tilcara, en la quebrada de Humahuaca llega la más boreal de las bodegas en suelo argentino hoy. Ése es un viaje que me reservo hacer el año que viene; probablemente en Semana Chanta 2011. b) Por otro lado, de la fuerza y presencia que ha adquirido Cafayate en la escena vinera nacional. El torrontés ha sido mejorado enormemente. Las bodegas tradicionales y las nuevas - hay un montón, casi todas onda boutique - se han refinado muchísimo especialmente en viñedo y luego en bodega, haciéndolo más límpido en aspecto, más sutil en aroma y más sedoso en paladar; todo eso sin perder la polenta original, que lo hace un sui-generis argento por excelencia. Están sacando unos tannat de la gran pelota: vinos de cuerpo medio con muy sutiles notas, más que de especias, de yuyos serranos que te dan vuelta el mate. Para ponerle una tetina a la botella y bajársela de una. Mención especial, la gastronomía salteña He morfado de maravillas, especialmente los tamales. Y el conejo, y el cabrito, y las empanadas, y, y,... Los postres regionales son para matar un diabético, pero una delicia al paladar, máxime acompañados con un licorcito o aguardiente idem. Ir a Salta en auto es un problema. Si te descuidás, para manejar de vuelta necesitás una semana para que se te vaya el pedo y que te vuelva a calzar el cinturón en el punto de ida. Y la frutilla de la nota: Como mendocino, lo declaro: El mejor malbec argentino HOY es, por lejos, un salteño. El Coquena 2009 de bodega Yacochuya. Hecho sin madera en la mini-bodega ubicada en Yacochuya, a unos 2000 metros s/n/m; propiedad de la familia Etchart, el enólogo jefe es el franchute Michel Rolland, con Marcos Etchart de co-equiper. En el caso del vino Coquena - el más simple y sencillito de los 20 a 22.000 litros anuales que elaboran - es total autoría de Etchart. Los otros vinos son malbecs a la manera de los grand-cru franchutes, añejados en la mejor madera francesa. Indescriptible, para cortarse las venas. En mi humilde opinión,... p e r f e c t o . Un purasangre de putamadre. La primer botella la compré yo allá; al pie de la vaca y de las manos del mismo Marcos Etchart. La primer caja la compré acá, del distribuidor en Mendoza, el Jueves pasado. AH! AH! El 21 de Noviembre a la noche, en un balcón de Reñaca con vista a la bahía de Valparaiso, con otro matrimonio amigo nos bajamos un platazo de machas a la parmesana (*) acompañadas con Toso extra-brut bien frío. ...Hace falta describir algo más de la situación?. Salu-2 Arq. Aurelio Horacio Bujaldón Dr. Emilio Jofré 152 [M5502BUD] Mendoza tel. (0261) 427 3149 cel. (0261-15) 513 6145 mail: aure...@bujaldon.net; abujal...@gmail.com msg: abujal...@hotmail.com skype: abujaldon (*) A las machas frescas sobre su concha se las cubre con una fina lengua de mantequilla salada chilena más hebras de parmesano. Dos minutos en el microondas y listo: Se las come sin cubiertos. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Brazil would recognize a Palestinian UDI
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == It would be a mistake to think that the Brazilian state has ever been a client state of the USofAm. 2010/12/5 Marv Gandall marvg...@gmail.com: Brazil's public announcement of support for the Palestinian position is also further evidence of the US's weakening hold on its former client states.) However, it is true that the announcement has a lot to do with the difficulties of the US bourgeoisie and government. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Brazil would recognize a Palestinian UDI,
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/12/5 DW dwalters...@gmail.com: A client state is a state like Bosnia or Kosovo today, one where the entire politics of the country is run by the US Embassy. Nothing happens without the US' OK. The state *depends* on the US as opposed to only be influenced by it. Brazil is fast becoming a little, or not so little, Imperialist state all it's own, or *so it seems*. At least the capitalists there would like that to be the case. I agree with the first part, disagree with the second. There are no gradations in being an imperialist nation or not. You can´t be a little imperialist because being imperialist implies to be accepted by other imperialist nations as an equal partner in the exploitation of the semicolonial world. Grey is theory, etc., etc., etc. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Support /any/ struggle of the oppressed: a question whichI feel is scathing.
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I am not speaking of _union_ activism against the bourgeoisie. I am speaking of _political_ options, that is different societal projects in struggle. Would you bet that /every/ oppressed group has /always/ been clear as to the aim of their struggles? If yes, then why political discussion at all. Let´s allow the omniscient masses do history in spontaneity. If not, then not every struggle by any oppressed group deserves support. 2010/12/3 Greg McDonald gregm...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == This has always been the official position of the IWW, in contradistinction to the AFL and other pro-business unions in the USA. I can't speak of unions in other countries. On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:57 PM, S. Artesian sartes...@earthlink.net wrote: No, we should support the workers by fighting against the extra-exploitation of the migrant workers, by demanding that ALL workers have access to the same benefits and social services; that no tiering of wages be allowed; that all immigrant workers be afforded immediate union membership, and that no decertification of unions be allowed,.. etc. etc. etc. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] A comment by Diana Johnstone on A Serbian film, Croats and Muslims, and the left
, the Muslims of Bosnia and Kossovo, of course, had every right to accet material aid from whomever, but in the same predicament is anyone who leads a struggle. What we must assess is the validity of that struggle, from the point of view of the general struggle for socialism. When your struggle appears as an outcome of an inter-imperialist brawl within the general imperialist movement to break apart a somewhat rebel country, I find it difficult to support it from the point of view of socialists. Not, of course, from the point of view of the imperialist bourgeoisies. But I suppose Tom Cod is NOT on this latter side... -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Amazed
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Why Stalinist like innuendo, Tom? Really, can´t see it. 2010/12/2 Tom Cod tomc...@gmail.com: Well, leaving aside your Stalinist like innuendo about me personally -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Support /any/ struggle of the oppressed: a question which I feel is scathing.
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I hope I am not trespassing any limit with this. If so, please Louis Pr. Moderator make me know. This is not my intention. 2010/12/2 Tom Cod tomc...@gmail.com: One does not have to be a Bolshevik to appreciate Lenin's dictum in what is to be done that socialists should support all struggles of oppressed people. We all agree, I guess, in that proletarians are oppressed by the bourgeoisie everywhere, don´t we? Should we support the struggle of the exploited Italian workers of the Valley of the Po, oppressed as they are by their own bourgeoisie, when they fight against the competition provided by cheap non-Italian labor in the marketplace by supporting political parties that promote expulsion of foreign labor? -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] A Serbian film
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Maybe there is no other way to explain what the West and the local Quislings have done to Yugoslavian peoples by the West and their local allies in the name of Liberty (and profit earning...) Mass rapists of the worst kind. Dare you send a guided missile to wantonly impact at the crowded nursery of a hospital in Belgrade? Then watch such a film as the Serbian directors have produced. If you dare do the worst evil in real life, you should dare watch a lesser, fictional, evil. At least a single newborn is raped. Not dozens murdered, burnt, poisoned or worse. 2010/11/30 Dan d.koech...@wanadoo.fr: I suppose you've all heard about a Serbian film by now, the most horrific, disturbing film ever made. Caused an out-roar when it was premiered in certain festivals in the US, in England, in Germany ... Amidst all the controversy, I've just watched a Serbian film. And it's true, it is a very disturbing film, but at the same time quite a challenging one, in terms of understanding the motivations of the Serbian directors. For the film is undoubtedly a serious effort and not some cheap production. The actors are major Serbian actors, the shots are slow, wide and are the product of much prior thinking in terms of colours, contrasts and atmosphere. But it is also incredibly horrific. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Lincoln Elected 150 Years Ago This Day
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On the contrary: read The Real Lincoln, by some neoliberal historian whose name I don´t remember now, and you will support Lincoln against any odds. 2010/11/6 C. G. Estabrook galli...@illinois.edu: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I think you should reconsider your support for Lincoln. Read, if you haven't, William Marvel, /Mr. Lincoln Goes to War/ (2006). On 11/6/10 11:54 AM, Mark Lause wrote: The other day, I was off on an election year rant about the present administration and its phony baloney opposition. One of the listeners on whom this rant was sadly inflicted looked at me and asked, So who's the last person elected president that you'd have supported? Well, 150 years isn't that long a time, I guess. :-) Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Spa] Nestor Kirchner and Ann Krüger
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == From an interview with one of his four personal secretaries. Sorry, no time for translations: Cuando fue la negociación con el FMI fue impresionante. Lo llamaban en nombre de Anne O. Krueger y él decía “decile que no estoy”. Así diez veces, hasta que un día atiendo el teléfono y era la mismísima Anne Krueger que quería hablar con Kirchner. Entonces, yo entré al despacho, y con una cara pálida de nervios le dije “Doctor, Anne Krueger al teléfono”. Él me miró como diciendo qué me importa. Entonces le dije que era como la décima vez que llamaba y por el tono de voz no está nada contenta. “Decile que no estoy, a mí el único que me puede apretar es el pueblo”, me dijo sin que se le mueva una pestaña. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Fidel Castro on Cristina Fernández de Ki rchner
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Néstor Kirchner is dead. The imperialist media system has not paid too much attention to this event, and the reasons were exposed by, among others, Mark Weisbrot. In fact, they wisely organized ignorance again! But all over South America, both extremes of the social spectrum know what does this death mean. The poor and lower mid-income strata of the Arg population in Buenos Aires sent a protracted, determined, combative and loud goodbye message to the former President who, however slightly but unmistakably, had recovered the main guidelines of the policies of popular nationalism established by Juan Perón and Eva Perón in the immediate aftermath of World War 2. He also displayed a clear policy of unification towards Latin America, and turned Argentina into the mainstay of a newly born South American reunification (which has been a boon both to Venezuela and Cuba, to say the least). He taught the world that a country could say No to the IMF without at the same time falling into civil war. He started the long awaited and never fulfilled Augean cleanup of the representatives of imperialism and oligarchy both in the civil service and in the military. He had the guts to command to the Commander in Chief of the Army to bring down the portrait of Jorge Rafael Videla in the Military College, and to give the former ESMA to the human rights organizations. Shortcomings? Lots of. Hundreds of. But this is not the time to bring them to the light. In a sense, his sought death consciously. He knew he could not keep the maddening tempo of his political militancy without risking a massive heart attack. But he did not stop for even a second. Death, at last, won that struggle. But at the same time he died in a politically useful way. In 1954, an oligarchic and imperialist conspiration encircled the Brazilian President Getúlio Vargas and forced him to eventually choose to kill himself, which gesture of greatness afforded the Brazilian national revolutionary movement ten more years of life and power. In this sense, Kirchner´s death can be equated to that of Vargas. Because during these last few days, many Argentineans thought about where did Kirchner start, and where they are now. The message on a small note stuck on a fence near the Pink House reemerged: Many of us who thank you today would not exist if you had not been President, Néstor. Thus, the oligarchic conspiration against Cristina Fernández receded violently, pushed back by millions of popular hands. The forces of counter-revolution have already given their own answer to the death of Kirchner. As Louis Proyect (BTW, the single list member to have given some attention to this issue) showed, in an instantaneous electrical display of brutal honesty, Arg (that is, Arg-rape based) stocks and bonds in the NYSE rose up to 50%. Their local counterparts were caught by Census ennumerators in joyful lunches with champagne. This was an unexpected side result of the Census... Now, you have Cristina Fernández at the helm. Alone. The ravens and vultures would like her to be weak. Pity for them. See what has Fidel -according to Arévalo Méndez Romero, the current Ven ambassador in Buenos Aires and Vice Minister of Foreign Relations in 2003- to say about her: Spanish version (published on Página 12, today) DOS “En la noche del 25 de mayo de 2003, después de la asunción de Néstor Kirchner, tuvimos con Hugo Chávez una reunión con Fidel Castro aquí en Buenos Aires, en el hotel. Allí, Chávez le pidió a Fidel su impresión sobre Kirchner, a quien prácticamente no conocían. Me parece, Fidel, por sus respuestas, por su mirada, que estamos ante un nuevo dirigente defensor de las causas latinoamericanas, ante un nuevo aliado, le dijo Chávez. Ante uno no, creo que ante dos, le respondió Fidel, escuchen lo que dice su esposa, préstenle atención a esa mujer.” English: TWO “During the evening of May 25th, 2003, after Néstor Kirchner took on his post, Hugo Chávez and others, me among them, met with Fidel Castro here, in Buenos Aires, at the hotel. Chávez requested Fidel´s opinion on Kirchner, whom they almost did not know. Chávez told him: I think, Fidel, that his answers, the look in his eyes, show a new leader who will defend the Latin American cause, a new ally. Fidel replied: Not one, I think that they are two. Listen to what his wife has to say, pay attention to that woman.” I bear witness: Fidel knew what he was talking about. Wait and see. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] National armies in Latin America (please, Mark L, help) [was Re: Positive development in Ecuador?]
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/10/13 Manuel Barrera mtom...@hotmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Nestor said: Yes, of course, the national army would end serving the ruling class as it always, in the end, does. The question is why do you think that the single class in Latin America that can lead a process of national reunification is the bourgeoisie? First, why should we believe that a unified army of Bolivia, Venezuela, et al. constitute an anti-imperialist army? Because Evo says so, or Hugo? No. Because the USofAm say so. Ask DoD who would they rather fear, a host of midget impossible armies or a joint army of everyone South of the Border. It is almost absurd to have to explain this. Do you believe that a unified army of Bolivia and other Latin American countries (other than of Cuba, which I consider reflecting a different class than that of those others) would represent the workers and oppressed of those unified countries? How would that happen, by dictate of Morales or by a proletarian revolution and mass mobilization against both the imperialists and their partners in the national bourgeoisies? I believe that such an army could only be the consequence of a revolutionary victory of the peoples of the South and Central tier of the Americas against the Northern one. And it would happen by Permanent REvolution in action. Second, I believe, Nestor, that you misunderstand my question regarding an anti-imperialist army and whether I (or others?) believe that the national bourgeois can lead a process of national reunification. Of course not, but these are two different questions. Indeed, the national bourgeoisies are united in maintaining their national identifies precisely against a broad unification that would result in the hegemony of the working masses and the oppressed. They (the bourgeois) are only interested in maintaining their rule, so, they are unlikely to seek unification Except to further their rule. The imperialists will support or oppose such unifications depending on whether it serves their class. There really is only one class, the proletariat (in its broad conception of the working masses and their allies), that is capable of promoting internationalist unity, so, no, I do not believe the bourgeoisie to be capable of fostering unity except the unity of dominance by capital over labor. There is no bourgeoisie worth that name South of the Border. There are oligarchies, who really want to make everyone believe that there can exist an Uruguayan, Guatemalan, Bolivian, Argentinean, even Brazilian INDEPENDENT nation. The bourgeoisies (even the b in S Paulo) are unable to understand their own historic needs, not to speak of tasks. And the unification of Latin America is certainly NOT an internationalist agenda. It is simply to start again where we had begun 200 years ago: as a unified whole, now with the bridge between Luso and Castillian Iberoamericans spanned thanks to the force of acts. To conflate these two issues seems to be an evasion of the question whether an anti-imperialist army as proposed here by a bourgeois government albeit led by a leftist leader whose class identity has yet clearly to be defined by its actions and class allegiances as anything but a bourgeois government. Is Evo calling for a different revolutionary army composed of workers, peasants, and indigenos or for a unification of current armies of each state into a single unified anti-imperialist army? If the latter, why would a call by a revolutionist (conceding for the sake of argument the still questionable issue whether Evo is indeed such) to build such an army out of the components of armies that constitute the armed body of the State in their respective countries be anything but reflective of the class nature of the state they are organized to defend? What exactly are these armed bodies of men doing to defend the working class and its march to power in Bolivia never mind against U.S. imperialism? I am not used to evade questions. When they deserve an answer. From my own humble point of view yours brings about nothing, so I don´t feel I should answer it. Sorry. It seems to me that the class nature of the respective leftist governments are still in question and role of Morales, Chavez, or Correa (among others) remain in question, too. There is much promise, and hope, in the anti-imperialist nature of these governments, but they can Never hope to transcend that promise absent a strategic march to end capitalism and the mobilization of the masses to
Re: [Marxism] re statement by CONAIE
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Nestor, Correa has said publicly the USA was not behind the coup attempt. I tend to agree. It was too disorganized to have been arranged by the US embassy, IMO. BTW, Do you think Correa is lying? I say Correa is smarter than US intelligence and policy makers, and won´t buy a red herring. Serious case? You must be joking. I have a second cousin who once worked for military intelligence. Do you think I should be strung up? You are not a national organization whose policies have been tending to split the Ecuadorean society along lines which may be too perilous for the Ecuadoreans and too useful for the US Embassy. There is no comparison. At any rate, if you have a second cousin who once worked for military intelligence, and just in case, I will check anything you send me with a political comissar from Cuba (joke, joke, joke, joke!!!) Greg Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] re statement by CONAIE
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Been following the whole debate on this from afar, and in the midst of too much work to allow me to take part in it. I am quite amazed at Greg´s position, particularly as expressed below: The fact is, Correa has refused time and again to implement procedures and policies agreed upon in the constituent assembly, Michael. He keeps pandering to the right wing of his own party, rather than responding positively to the demands of the popular movement. Dear Greg, when you shift whatever support you can give from an elected president (whatever her or his political leanings and / or political mistakes, crimes, sins, etc) to a movement by a small fraction of the state structures, a fraction which, oh surprise, can shoot at the president, when you do that, Greg, you are automatically out of the popular movement whatever you understand for such a thing. No matter what grievances CONAIE or shmotzaie can have against Correa, if in the name of those grievances they side with an armed fraction of the Ecuadorean state that acts under support of the Embassy of the imperialist state of the USofAm, then you are missing the main grievance all Equatorians share: the fact that they are ruled from afar by an Embassy that does not hesitate to resort to the police against the elected president of Ecuador. And this, without even skimming the serious case that Gollinger has made on CONAIE. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] CONAIE denies NED Charge
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Dear Juan, sorry but standing on the fence when a democratically elected president is under attack by an US-backed gang of thugs means, among other things and essentially, that you equate both sides as different versions of the same thing, which can only reinforce the side with the stronger backing. In this case, the side backed by the US Embassy. Normally, the impure and imperfect national movements in Latin America fall down due to their own mistakes and concessions to imperialism, not the other way. But I would advance the timid suggestion that if at the very moment when this national and popular movement suffers an attack from imperialism or people funded by imperialism or simply from sepoys and Quislings who are fool or alienated enough to work for the interest of imperialism without asking that they, at least, be paid, well, if at that very moment you stress the limits of the government under attack, you will in the end lose every gram of popular support you might have deserved up to that moment. Is this what we are fostering in what some of our list´s members consider to be the Ecuadorean Left? We would be pushing them to political irrelevance. Which is exactly what these members should not want to happen. The rest, dear Juan, SHOULD be silence. Which it unfortunately seldom is. 2010/10/8 Juan Fajardo fajar...@ix.netcom.com: -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Spa] Chávez on Ecuador
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == [Sorry can´t translate. By a smart reporter. Sprinkled with some details and observations of local glamour that can help understand politics in Latin America today] http://www.politicaymedios.com/internacional/Hugo_Chavez___le_dije__Correa__tu_no_mueres_hoy__20101001130406.php -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Spa] Interesting details on Ecuador
Pérez, alias SWAT, así como vínculos con oficiales de organismos especiales y de inteligencia de las dos instituciones.”/ (Textual) _A manera de conclusiones_ La intentona golpista en Ecuador es la antesala, sin lugar a dudas, del incremento de la labor desestabilizadora de la derecha ecuatoriana. Quisieron probar si existían condiciones para derrocar a Correa, pero no emplearon todos los recursos disponibles y muchos de los responsables de esta intentona se ocultaron en la sombra o se lanzaron, hipócritamente, y, cuando todo el mundo repudió la asonada, a hacer declaraciones a favor de la democracia. Muchos peligros amenazan a la Revolución Ciudadana impulsada por Correa, entre ellos nuevos intentos por derrocarlo por la vía violenta, ante la imposibilidad de hacerlo en las urnas. Hoy más que nunca es importante sacar experiencias de estos nefastos acontecimientos. Una de ellas es la necesidad de buscar la unidad de las fuerzas progresistas, perfeccionar los métodos de trabajo con las masas, enfrentar con oportunidad y convicción la desinformación entre las bases populares y los movimientos sindical e indígena, esclarecer más que imponer, y esa será, sin lugar a dudas, la clave del triunfo. Es la hora de rectificar errores y de fortalecer nuestra fe en el pueblo, de depurar a oportunistas y a quienes perjudican el trabajo del gobierno desde adentro. El verdadero enemigo desembolsa grandes cantidades de dinero de forma descarada y controla desde su complejo de oficinas diplomáticas, las actividades de muchos elementos dentro de la FF AA y la Policía Nacional. Se debe confiar, es cierto, en el soldado honesto y patriota. A la par, se debe ser cuidadoso con aquel que se vende y es capaz de traicionar a la Constitución cuando su protector de la CIA se lo aconseja. Estos hechos dejaron, sin embargo, a mi modo de ver, la apreciación de que el presidente Correa y su pueblo se crecieron con decoro y dignidad por encima de quienes trataron de tronchar el futuro del Ecuador. Fueron admirados por el mundo y el mundo no les dio la espalda. La valentía de Correa como líder y hombre probo, quedó demostrada al cerrarse este capítulo bochornoso en la historia del Ecuador. Digno y glorioso dijo a Radio Pública, para que lo escuchara su amado pueblo: /“Yo no voy dar marcha atrás, si quieren vengan a buscarme acá, denme un tiro y que siga adelante la República, me matarán a mí, como decía Neruda, podrán cortar las flores pero no impedir la llegada de la primavera”./ -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] AP on Correa and Ecuador (surprisingly good)
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == This WAS a coup attempt. And Correa, far from a fuckwit, is one of the most serious revs in Latin America. Whoever thinks otherwise is an ignorant on the issues at stake. Or worse (if Latin American and particularly so in Ecuadorean). Five AM here, with insomnium, so won´t extend myself. Don´t even bother to ask me to substatiate. Maybe some other day. Been in touch with the whole development hour after hour. 2010/10/2 Greg McDonald gregm...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:07 PM, DW dwalters...@gmail.com wrote: For Joaquín Correa is our Cormade. Speak for yourself. I've met workers representatives in the Congress of Ecuador who are *part of Correa's block* who think NOT! Leaders of the hydroelectric workers; indigenous movements, public workers unions and others *all of whom voted for him* AND defend his Presidency but think he strarted *caving* to imperialism by attacking the workers who supported him. They stand with him against Imperialism and for democracy. But as to his policies IN the country...not so much anymore. Next thing you know Joaquin will be saying the CONAIE is an agent of imperialism, and that Correa's speeches declaring the popular forces of Ecuador to be left-wing ecological and indigenous infantilism, are in fact true, and that CONAIE's critique of Correa's right-wing privatization policies is just a CIA plot. If in fact this was a coup attempt, which I seriously doubt, Correa is a fuckwit for alienating his base and talking out of both sides of his mouth. Greg Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] The Party Line against Correa
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == MOst obviously, I wish to thank Joaquín for the time he has spent explaining what should not even need an explanation. 2010/10/1 Joaquín Bustelo jbust...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == For those folks on this list who have never met a Latin American national movement they liked, I offer these comments as a way to avoid having to read a lot of imperialist propaganda but still being able to hew to the anti-national-movement (i.e., anti-populist) line. 1. It wasn't a coup. The populists like Chavez and Evo Morales always say coup coup coup to get domestic and international support. This was just a police u -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Arg main unions central against the coup in Ecuador (Spanish)
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Of course, these are irrepresentative bureaucrats who have nothing to do with red blooded Marxists. Oh, my. BTW, the Arg fraction of the Antipopulist international was also duped by the national bourgeoisies, since they attended the rally against the coup Thursday last. LA CGT CONTRA EL INTENTO DE GOLPE DE ESTADO EN ECUADOR El movimiento obrero organizado repudia enérgicamente el intento de golpe de estado en Ecuador y se solidariza con su pueblo y su Gobierno. La insubordinación de partes de las fuerzas de seguridad pretende poner en jaque el proceso popular y democrático de nuestro país hermano. Los trabajadores argentinos hemos padecido sangrientas dictaduras militares que, con el objetivo de imponer los intereses de los sectores concentrados de la economía, nos arrebataron no sólo todos nuestros derechos sociales, sino la vida de miles de compañeros. Hoy vemos con honda preocupación cómo se intenta repetir en Ecuador el inadmisible golpe ocurrido en Honduras hace poco más de un año. Desde la CGT venimos denunciando cómo se desarrolla una feroz ofensiva por parte de los poderes económicos que buscan detener los procesos de transformación que está viviendo nuestra América. En esta nueva etapa de la historia, donde los gobernantes se parecen a sus pueblos la política central es la justicia social, la defensa de la soberanía política, la independencia económica y la unidad suramericana que está en marcha. Estas banderas jamás serán negociadas. Expresamos nuevamente nuestro compromiso con la defensa de la democracia en todo el territorio suramericano y nuestra solidaridad más fraterna con el pueblo ecuatoriano y su Presidente Rafael Correa. Buenos Aires, 30 de septiembre de 2010 Julio Piumato - Secretario DDHH Hugo Moyano - Secretario General SI RECONQUISTA-POPULAR LE RESULTA ÚTIL, CONSIDERE LA POSIBILIDAD DE BRINDARLE APOYO FINANCIERO. HAGA UN DEPÓSITO EN LA CUENTA 3-72081/5 DEL BANCO FRANCÉS, O CONTÁCTESE CON recpo...@gmail.com INFORMACIÓN SOBRE LA LISTA Y SUSCRIPCIONES POR VÍA INTERNET: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/reconquista-popular. SUSCRIPCIÓN POR CORREO ELECTRÓNICO: envíe un mensaje escribiendo 'help' sin comillas en el asunto (no escriba nada en el cuerpo del mensaje) a reconquista-popular-requ...@lists.econ.utah.edu EL CORREO ELECTRÓNICO DE LA PERSONA QUE ADMINISTRA LA LISTA ES: reconquista-popular-ad...@lists.econ.utah.edu TODOS LOS MENSAJES DE ESTA LISTA QUEDAN ARCHIVADOS Y PUEDEN CONSULTARSE EN: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/reconquista-popular/ Lista de correo electrónico Reconquista-Popular reconquista-popu...@lists.econ.utah.edu http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/reconquista-popular -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Spa] US Intelligence penetration of Ecuatorian police
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == CITANDO LA FUENTE,EL MATERIAL DE ESTA LISTA ES DE LIBRE REPRODUCCIÓN Telesur Informe confirmado: inteligencia USA penetró a fondo la policía ecuatoriana El sublevamiento de elementos golpistas de la policía ecuatoriana en contra el Presidente Rafael Correa confirma un informe alarmante sobre la infiltración de la policía ecuatoriana por los servicios de inteligencia norteamericanos difundido en el 2008 que revelaba como diplomáticos norteamericanos se dedicaban a corromper a la policía y también a oficiales de la Fuerzas Armadas. Policías golpista agreden a fotógrafos de la prensa internacional que intentaban cubrir represión contra el pueblo ecuatoriano. (Patria Grande) Por: Jean-Guy Allard :: El sublevamiento de elementos golpistas de la policía ecuatoriana en contra el Presidente Rafael Correa confirma un informe alarmante sobre la infiltración de la policía ecuatoriana por los servicios de inteligencia norteamericanos difundido en el 2008, en el cual se señalaba como muchos miembros de los cuerpos policíacos desarrollaban una ''dependencia'' hacia la Embajada de Estados Unidos. El informe precisaba que unidades de la Policía ''mantienen una dependencia económica informal con Estados Unidos, para el pago de informantes, capacitación, equipamiento y operaciones''. El uso sistemático de técnicas de corrupción de parte de la CIA para adquirirse la ''buena voluntad'' de oficiales de policía fue descrito y denunciado en numerosas oportunidades por el ex agente de la CIA Philip Agee quién, antes de abandonar las filas de la agencia, estuvo asignado a la Embajada de Estados Unidos en Quito. En su informe oficial, difundido a finales de octubre 2008, el ministro ecuatoriano de Defensa, Javier Ponce, reveló como diplomáticos norteamericanos se dedicaban a corromper a la policía y también a oficiales de la Fuerzas Armadas. Confirmando el hecho, la jefatura de la Policía ecuatoriana anunció entonces que sancionaría a sus agentes que colaboraban con Estados Unidos mientras la Embajada estadounidense proclamaba la ''transparencia'' de su apoyo a Ecuador. ''Nosotros trabajamos con el gobierno de Ecuador, con los militares, con la Policía, para fines muy importantes para la seguridad'', declaró la embajadora estadounidense en Quito, Heather Hodges. Sin embargo, la diplomática dijo a periodistas que no haría comentarios ''sobre temas de inteligencia''. La agregada de prensa, por su parte, Marta Youth, se nego rotundamente a referirse a las denuncias del gobierno ecuatoriano, que incluían la participación de la CIA en una operación con Colombia que derivó en el ataque militar colombiano contra la guerrilla de las FARC en territorio ecuatoriano del 1 de marzo de aquel año. El jefe de Inteligencia del Ejército, Mario Pazmiño, había sido destituido por ocultar información relacionada con el ataque contra las FARC. En los últimos meses, funcionarios norteamericanos se aparecieron en Ecuador, bajo pretexto de profundizar las relaciones entre Ecuador y EEUU. El secretario adjunto para el hemisferio occidental del Departamento de Estado Arturo Valenzuela, visitó y re-visitó al presidente Correa, en vista a una visita de la canciller Hillary Clinton. Valenzuela se hizo acompañar por Tedd Stern, ''delegado especial para los cambios climáticos'' también conocido por su afinidad con la CIA. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Cajoun
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == One of the striking issues I discovered long ago on a National Geographic Magazine (none the less, those that in Zabriskie Point were burned as an example of the burning of a social class) was that Cajoun (or Cajun, don´t know right spelling) had no problem in calling themselves Cajun while they soon discovered when non-Cajun used the term in a derogatory way. That´s exactly what happens in the large mass of the Arg population, who are called negros de mierda by the white skinned, Euro-born, urban middle class and hate it, but also call each other negro and even negro de mierda in clear knowledge that there might even exist some tenderness in the words. Same with hijo de puta, which outside Argentina may well be the reason for a killing but here can rank from same thing to a most tender admirative phrase. I had called Greg bad things before he bullshitted my posting (which, I have to admit, deserved not such a treatment but something more polite though on the same line). All´s OK with me. If I offended Greg, I apologize too. But, really, if the police mutiny had prospered, Ecuador would now be under a pro-imperialist regime, probably led by Lucio Gutiérrez. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Spa, sorry...] What I consider a serious evaluation of what happened in Ecuador and its consequences
profesional a Estados Unidos a través de la Escuela de las Américas. En Ecuador esa impronta filoyanqui parece seguir estando grabada en los mandos de las instituciones armadas. El discurso del comandante en jefe del ejército, de aparente respaldo al presidente Correa, estuvo teñido de un matiz amenazador, extorsivo casi, cuando estimó que derogar la ley que había servido de pretexto al putsch y que reducía prebendas a los empleados públicos, era un factor necesario para sanar la crisis… Este señor no debía opinar, sino apoyar al presidente y comandante en jefe, y a la Constitución vigente. No nos engañemos, pues. Y no nos traguemos, por favor, las elucubraciones semánticas de un analista como Rosendo Fraga, que tiene el tupé de definir lo de Ecuador como un “motín” y no como un intento de “golpe de estado”. Lo sucedido en Ecuador no se puede disociar del golpe en Honduras, ni de la instalación y libre circulación de los marines en Costa Rica, ni de la reactivación de la IV Flota en el Caribe, ni de la presencia de efectivos norteamericanos en Paraguay, ni de los ataques frontales de los medios contra Cristina Kirchner, Lula da Silva, Fernando Lugo o Hugo Chávez, que apuntan en mayor o menor medida a desestabilizar unas experiencias que van, la mayoría de ellas, a contracorriente de los parámetros de la ortodoxia económica. Y mañana se vota en Brasil. El establishment mediático-financiero de ese enorme país siente una especie de rechazo de piel contra Lula, rechazo que viene a bañar también las espaldas de la candidata a la que Lula apoya, Dilma Rouseff, a pesar de que esta tiene una visión de la economía aun más moderada que la del jefe del Partido Trabalhista. Las encuestas dan a Dilma un descenso en su apreciación del voto, que tal vez la obligaría a ir a una segunda vuelta; pero, vaya uno a fiarse de las encuestas… En Argentina el mapa político sigue siendo complicado. Hay una buena probabilidad de que los Kirchner alcancen la victoria en la primera ronda de las elecciones previstas para el año próximo, pero con una serie de incógnitas que devienen de lo problemático que resultan para ellos los futuros guarismos en tres de los cuatro más importantes distritos electorales: la Capital Federal, Córdoba y Santa Fe. Sólo en la provincia de Buenos Aires –el más pesado colector de votos de la República- podrían tener los Kirchner, quizá, una ventaja clara. Dice un interesante análisis publicado en La Nación –que no en vano es el diario que condensa los intereses de nuestra clase dirigente histórica y fue fundado por quien más responsabilidad tuvo en la gestación de nuestro sistema de poder- que frente a esta situación el kirchnerismo tiene en su seno a dos grupos que discuten acerca de cómo gestionar y amplificar el poder político: uno que reivindica el choque directo con las corporaciones mediática, financiera y empresaria que siguen controlando los ámbitos claves de la gestión del país, y otro que buscaría más bien canales de diálogo con esos grupos. Uno no puede dar consejos desde aquí, pero recordemos que la primera de esas líneas fue la que sacó al Frente para la Victoria del pozo en que había caído después del rechazo de la 125 y del revés electoral del 28 de Junio. Hay muchas cosas moviéndose en el aire por estos días en los países del subcontinente. No se puede subestimar su amenaza. El referente ecuatoriano, aunque no cabe que se repita en todas partes al pie de la letra, nos debe enseñar que el enemigo nunca duerme y que nada lo dejará contento. Hay un difícil camino a recorrer. Quien viva, verá. (www.enriquelacolla.com) -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Reading Keats
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/9/25 Gary MacLennan gary.maclenn...@gmail.com: We too are living in a world with very little hope – certainly in terms of the absence of what William Morris called 'a rising people'. Not in Latin America, though in our particular ways. And I thank History for this gift after all the years of bitterness we have had to pass through. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] masses on the move
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Watch Taxi Driver, Gary. You´ll find Ballantine there. One of the possible archetypal US made kind of Fascist. Best. 2010/9/15 Gary MacLennan gary.maclenn...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I couldn't find anything about Ballentine, Nestor. Don't be such a tease! You are absolutely correct though about your analysis of this period. The I'm as mad as hell folk are out of their cages and of course they will only do horizontal damage and damage to those below them. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Nigh not the word
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/8/14 Louis Proyect l...@panix.com: Leonardo Kosloff wrote: and the work of socialist parties on it. http://www.ceics.org.ar/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=157:new-article-sour-sweetness-the-left-attacks-the-heart-of-argentine-capitalismcatid=65:argentine-economyItemid=78 The PO, as much as the PTS, and even the PCR and MST, are now collecting the fruits of years of work. Wow. The revolution is nigh. Not tomorrow, or past tomorrow, because we are on a long week end holiday. The working class has gone to the touristic centers. The bus drivers, in fact, have refused to strike for a rise in their wages but just to make sure they can bring the workers back to their revolutionary cells Monday evening. A pity they don´t have a Leftist leadership in their union, because in that case they would have surely forced the workers to remain in their own worksites and homes. If only the subways of Buenos Aires extended some 2500 km to every corner of the country... But be sure, Louis, be absolute and resolutely sure, we shall have a revolution in Argentina on Wednesday next, with the PCR and MST hammering on the kernel of the Arg economy by supporting the Arg large landowners against the mass of the people who don´t have the boon of being proletarians, er, enlightened proletarians. Nigh is not the word. The word is sigh. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Gay soccer: Arg world champion (Spa) [Just for the fun of it...]
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == CAMPEON El seleccionado argentino de fútbol gay se consagró ayer campeón en los VII Gay Games disputados en la ciudad alemana de Colonia. El equipo nacional venció en la final 3 a 0 al Seattle Jet City, informó el presidente de la Comunidad Homosexual Argentina (CHA), César Cigliutti. “Parece una buena coincidencia que la política argentina lidere, actualmente, el tema del matrimonio igualitario en América latina y que, coetáneamente, la selección gane el título mundial de futbol gay”, expresó Cigliutti. Además de su objetivo deportivo, el conjunto nacional llevó a Colonia un mensaje que reivindicó la aprobación de la ley de matrimonio igualitario en el país. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Brown is the new Black, illegal is the new nigger, but cancer is cancer
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/8/7 Gary MacLennan gary.maclenn...@gmail.com: Hi Joaqin Just to let you know that I read this and was very moved and alarmed by it. The first breaks from this Recession seem indeed to be working for the Right, but a turn will come. Never lose sight of that. A turn will certainly come, that´s true, Gary. But first things first. The road map should be clearly established; first of all. And I have seldom read a map as accurate as that which Joaquín has drawn. There was a Latin American poet, a Cuban, Nicolás Guillén, who wrote a poem to Little Rock, when Governor Faubus gave his famous stroke against Black citizens. The poem, not surprisingly named Little Rock, ended with the following lines which are becoming prophesy: Y bien, ahora, señoras y señores, señoritas, ahora niños, ahora viejos peludos y pelados, ahora indios, mulatos, negros, zambos, ahora pensad lo que sería el mundo todo Sur, el mundo todo sangre y todo látigo, el mundo todo escuela de blancos para blancos, el mundo todo Rock y todo Little, el mundo todo yanqui, todo faubus... Pensad por un momento, imaginadlo un solo instante. All right. Now, ladies and gentlemen, young ladies, children now, now hairy and bald old men, now indians, mulattos, blacks, zambos [1], now think you what would it be, the world all South, the world all blood and whip, the world all school of whites for whites, the world all Rock and all Little, the world all yanqui, all faubus... Think for a moment just guess it for a second. it is some years already (perhaps after reading some most interesting postings in this list, and certainly after some particular postings that appeared here after Katrina) that I arrived at the conclusion that the transformation of the US bourgeoisie into an imperialist bourgeoisie cannot be separated from the agreement between the robber barons of the North and the children of the slaveowners in the South. At the ideological level, this provided the material foundation for the replacement of the national/democratic ideology so well represented in the writings of Marx Twain (the founder of the first Anti-imperialist league in the US, don´t forget). This ideology had brought about the American Civil War (and, yes, as Joaquín remembers, Sherman´s scorched earth march through Georgia which put an end to slavery), and did not fit with the new state of mind required by the imperialist expansion. So that it was replaced by the imperialist/racist ideology that pervades US thinking today. This was not easy, nor immediate. It took decades, a century perhaps. I still remember Norman Mailer´s honest depiction of the Pacific scenario of World War 2 as simply an expansionist, colonialist, war: IMHO, Mailer was expressing the alarm of honest Liberal US citizens against what he felt was a possible turn of things (he did not seem to know too much of how long his country had advanced into that road). But nevertheless I have the impression that at least until Reagan there was never a single clear signal that the general mood that had been established by the Civil War would be replaced by the stinking, all faubus, ideology of these days. The last prairie fire, the final and shining last glow of the ideology that was in process of being murdered was the glorious movement for Civil Rights in the South, so fruitful. But after formal equality was established, the whole machine began to work again in order to allow us to witness this that we are withnessing today: what will an all faubus world look like. Once this is clearly established, we can start thinking about how to make a turn Left. [1] A child of American aborigin and black parents. Sorry if the translation does not make justice to the original, BTW. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Stalinism and Bakuninism (was: Earliest use of word Stalinism?)
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == No, no. I could understand the link with Bukharin. Nobody who has read Deutscher´s biographies can fail to do that, not to speak of Trotsky himself, etc. But Bakunin of all people. However, Lüko´s suggestion and explanation are heavily compelling, indeed. And in more respects than one it sheds light on current events in many places, BTW. 2010/8/1 DW dwalters...@gmail.com: I suspect that when Nestor first raised this he meant to say Bukharin not Bakunin. Bukharin was the first to raise the issue Socialism in one Country. I see that both the Bolshevik and Anarchist in question often get transposed with one another other. DAvid -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Stalinism and Bakuninism (was: Earliest use of word Stalinism?)
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Please, Greg, don´t hurry at conclusions. I, for one, _do_ understand the basic idea that the gangsterism of a petty bourgeois layer detached from a real unity with the working classes, the strong-arm tactics against political opponents and the mistrust against the working class as such which has to be commanded but not led, all this which according to Lüko (and IMHO not without strong reason) is first found in Bakunin and his followers, etc., nurtures strong stalinist tendencies (even though they don´t bear the name). I am portraying some of today´s politicians of the Left (even of my own generic current) who would fit that description and I would easily imagine leading a police state against (and at the same time on behalf of) the working class in the hypotesis of a workers state developing in Arg in the near future. This insight came me after reading Martín Koppel's pamphlet Peru's Shining Path - Anatomy of a reactionary sect, published in 1993 by Pathfinder Press (Spanish as Sendero Luminoso - Evolución de una secta estalinista in 1994 http://www.pathfinderpress.com/s.nl/it.A/id.599/.f). This Bakuninism is quite different from what we know as Anarchism today, in which individualism plays a central role, and where groups end up by all of them hanging out shingle or starting a business on their own. As to Sendero, their historic and political role (we are not talking about their idealist heroism) was as nefarious as anything can be. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Earliest use of word Stalinism?
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/7/31 Lüko Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.de: [On Stalinism] Anyway, Trotsky was wrong using that term. The proper term is Bakuninism. Bakunin has older rights for what others called wrongly Stalinism. I have long believed that Stalinism (particularly in its post-Khruschevian form) was some particular version of Social-Democracy, a Social-Democracy without a bourgeoisie to do the dirty task. But this is quite original, for me! Why would you say that Stalinism roots in Bakunin? Puzzled. Leaving out Engels from the sequence of name-that-person_isms is really a disgrace, by the way, since Engels made very important contributions, too. Although he could not be used for doctrinairian concoctions, so maybe that's why he was left out. There might exist another reason: Stalinist symbolic system was not at all unrelated with the symbolic system of the Orthodox Christian Church. This required a Trinity, not a Quartet. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] I guess Joaquín will agree, on Olga Gu illot
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == It is sad news that Olga Guillot died yesterday night. Had every worm been like her, maybe the Cuban Revolution wouldn´t have been necessary. Of course, and had my aunt had wheels, she would have been a bicycle. Now, seriously: that such a corrupt and miserable society as pre-Fidel Cuba, a hornet´s nest plagued by pimps, drug sellers, and every kind of maffia-type rubbish, could create people such as Olga Guillot gives one a sense of the human capacity to overcome the most extreme environments. Funnily enough, if this can be considered funny, Olga Guillot not only was famous for her extraordinary versions of Latino music but also for her version of Stormy Weather, that masterpiece by Billie Halliday, the same Black singer of Strange Fruits. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] My friend Richard Greener's take on the World Cup
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/7/12 Greg McDonald gregm...@gmail.com: Anyway, I am happy that Spain got the Cup. The Netherlands are but a faint shadow of what they were. You should know better Nestor. Yesterday was not a futbol match, it was warfare. Yes, maybe you are right. Well, sigh, faintly: Aupa España! :) Enouigh fútbol now. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] A question to mathematicians on this list
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == No, no, don´t be tricky. You have a single unbiased moose to toss high in the air, and you have only two possibilities: either the moose, who is the tabooed animal of the social group you are investigating, returns to the ground head down, or head up. You have nine opportunities to toss the mooose. The whole tribe is watching you and you must know that if you fail once they will ritually sacrifice you. That´s the heads and tails situation... :-) 2010/7/12 Ambrose Andrews ambrose-b...@vrvl.net: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Can anyone calculate the probabilities that Paul the octopus has reached his results by chance? Are we permitted to take into account all the other octopuses (and snails and squids and roosters and bats and carnivorous plants) in the world who failed to get even nine correct answers? In a large world, the probability of existence of an unlikely animal are high. -AA. -- Ambrose Andrews LPO box 8274 ANU Acton ACT 0200 Australia http://www.vrvl.net/~ambrose/ mailto:ambr...@vrvl.net voicemail:+61_261112936 work:+61_261256749 mobile:+61_415544621 irc:{undernet|freenode|oftc}:znalo xmpp:ambr...@jabber.fsfe.org skype:znalo7 CE38 8B79 C0A7 DF4A 4F54 E352 2647 19A1 DB3B F823 556A 6D19 0904 827C 9DB8 3697 32D0 1E11 403F 2BE1 Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] My friend Richard Greener's take on the World Cup
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Though I was badly hit by the Ger-Arg match, I kept watching the World Cup. The match between Uruguay and Germany was more than a little bit better than the boring thing we had to endure today. Neither Spain nor the Netherlands deserved the places they got. And I say it in spite of my respect for Spain, who started mediocre and grew through the Cup. But please if this is actual Spain, fútbol is in deep trouble. I hope this match goes ASAP into oblivion. Anyway, I am happy that Spain got the Cup. The Netherlands are but a faint shadow of what they were. 2010/7/12 Greg McDonald gregm...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-greener/my-apology-to-soccer-futb_b_642383.html Poor Richard, banished to the couch. I guess that's why they call it the nether lands. Paul the Octopus predicts he won't be getting laid anytime soon. Greg Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] A question to mathematicians on this list
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Can anyone calculate the probabilities that Paul the octopus has reached his results by chance? Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Spa] Nicholas Shumway and the voice of imperialism
excolonias inglesas: precisamente las 13 colonias que se unificaron para constituir los Estados Unidos, su país. Por lo demás, Latinoamérica no abarca a “muchas naciones muy diferentes”, sino a muchos Estados muy diferentes (uno de los cuales, Panamá, es una “invención” de sus paisanos yanquis), que es algo muy distinto. Decenas de Estados, pero una sola Nación Latinoamericana, unida no sólo por “la proximidad geográfica” (que es importante. ¿o acaso las 13 colonias norteamericanas no son geográficamente contiguas?), sino por su economía en desarrollo, su cultura mestiza, su lengua española mayoritaria, su hibridación racial y su religiosidad popular. Las “naciones” latinoamericanas, en realidad, como dice el propio título del libro de Shumway respecto a la Argentina, son una “invención”. Nunca dijo tanta verdad Shumway como en la portada de su obra. Estas “naciones” son una invención de las oligarquías portuarias de las grandes ciudades europeizadas del litoral continental, aliadas y/o sometidas al imperialismo balcanizador de turno. De todo esto, el académico norteamericano no dice una palabra. Es que la Unidad fue la base del desarrollo portentoso de los Estados Unidos y de su civilización. Pero. como dijo Trotsky, ahora “los civilizadores cierran el paso a los quieren civilizarse”. Shumway es uno de esos “civilizadores” y es la voz del imperialismo, del ALCA y del Departamento de Estado. Eso es lo esencial. Lo demás –algunas posiciones correctas de su libro- son la vistosa etiqueta que hace más vendible la mercadería podrida. Córdoba, 12 de julio de 2010 DISTRIBUYE: CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS PARA LA EMANCIPACION NACIONAL (CEPEN). Roberto A. Ferrero, Presidente. Es de libre reproducción mencionando la fuente. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Revolutions cannot be exported because they must be homegrown [was Re: Sect, party, movement, class - I]
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/7/10 Joaquín Bustelo jbust...@bellsouth.net: Someone once wrote in Spanish, and I no longer remember where I saw it but the idea has stayed with me, that if a revolution is to be a real revolution it must be unpublished (debe ser inédita), in other words, an original work, not a copy. Not a matter of chance that this was written in Spanish. There has been a pervading and obnoxious tendency in Latin America to import manufactured ideas as well as manufactured goods. There is nothing wrong in importing general ideas, but if they are to live and be politically relevant, they must be integrated, seamlessly integrated, into the historic experience of the masses. Which can´t, of course, be imported. That is why the Cubans could do what they did, and why most of other Latin American Marxists are still longing for a mass support they seldom find. No revolution can really take place that doesn´t root in the deepest radical traditions of the country and people that will make it. Imitation doesn´t work, because human masses act according to their own traditions and their own concrete situations. This implies, since no country or people shares its history with other countries or peoples (and this is WHY they can be considered different: because they are the result of particular histories that can be compared and classified in common blocks, but cannot be TRANSFERRED), that no revolution will ever adapt to an universal pattern. The idea that revolutions can be created ex nihilo, as if imported ready made, is, at best, naiveté, and at worst imperialist hybris. If I am not wrong those two are the infrared and UV stretches of the spectrum. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Formulating a path to abolish the working class - isn't it already too late?
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/7/6 Angelus Novus fuerdenkommunis...@yahoo.com: Lukewarm Willms: What you are still avoiding is the question about the path to abolish the working class. See, if you would bother to actually read Marx, rather than just swear by his name, you wouldn't ask such patently idiotic questions. The working class must abolish itself: [quote from the Grundrisse] Wonderful. An endless stroke of lightning amidst the deepest shadows I am living a few blocks off the building of the Arg General Confederation of Labor (CGT). And some of my comrades live almost wall to wall with some important factories here. I even meet, from time to time, some janitor. Do you think that by just telling them that they must abolish themselves, and immediately afterwards reading that passage of the Grundrisse aloud, we can instantly turn them into communists? May I quote you, A.N.? -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Something else about Vargas and Fascism
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == If Fascism is one expression of imperialist rule, then the authoritarian Vargas was, funny thing, an anti-Fascist. When he got to power, the actual source of imperialist domination in Brazil was the social bloc related to the export trade of coffee, headed by the United States based monopolies on the global scenario, and on the Paulista oligarchy in the country. Most revealing as to the actual meaning of the policies of Getúlio was the choice he made of a Vice-President for the elections of 1930. He chose J. Pessoa, a traditional politician in the North Eastern state of Paraíba. This man was the guy who had sunken the candidacy of still another Paulista, Júlio Prestes, to the presidency of the Nation. Among his own achievements, Pessoa had managed to levy taxes on the goods transported from inland Paraíba to the state´s capital and main harbor, the city of Paraíba. This cost him the most ardent hatred of the large landowners and the support of the popular masses in the State. He was eventually murdered by a political opponent, a journalist who was in direct relation with the Partido Republicano Paulista, the most eminent expression of US imperialist penetration in Brazil. The murder was linked with personal and love affairs too, in a quite Shakespearean way, but the political meaning of the fact was lost to no one. And this assassination was the spark that lit the revolution of 1930 in Brazil. Who is a Fascist and who is not a Fascist in the Third World are not easy questions to answer. Even in the soft usage of the word that, for example, Joaquín B. has been promoting on this list. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Who I am rooting for in the World Cup
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Yes, USAmerican women and Brazilian women are the great powers in women soccer. Regrettably enough, this is not the case with Arg women. Sexism is stronger here. 2010/6/21 Erik Toren ecto...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == The story of the Women's National Soccer team in the US is complex. One that for a long while languished in obscurity suffering a worse fate than the Men's Team. In great part due to sexism in US sports. A good documentary for those interested is Dare to Dream. http://www.amazon.com/Dare-Dream-Story-Womens-Soccer/product-reviews/B000RL6G82/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8showViewpoints=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dare_to_Dream:_The_Story_of_the_U.S._Women's_Soccer_Team A good sports documentary that includes the impact of Title XI and the Women's movement on the National Team. Unfortunately, the success of the Women's team has *not* translated well into the professional leagues. After the success of 1999 World Cup, in 2000 the Women's United Soccer Association was created as the professional Division 1 league. It only lasted 3 years and closed doors in 2003. Seven years later, Women's Professional Soccer was born with a number of 1999 players appearing. The league is struggling, but there is hope. On the Men's side, the North American Soccer League was organized in 1968. It survived the first major interest in soccer in the US during the 70's and early 80's, but closed shop in '84. Twelve years later, with the 1994 World Cup in the US, it gave impetus to the formation of a professional league in 1996. Major League Soccer has had its up and downs, but has managed to survive and become successful. Successful enough that the unionized players threatened to go on strike before the 2010 season and *win* concessions from the owners. Erik On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Lüko Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.de wrote: The women lead the way in US football (what they call soccer there). They are world class! Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Who I am rooting for in the World Cup
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Down here, we are all quite amazed at the fast evolution of USA teams along the last two decades or so. 2010/6/20 Erik Toren ecto...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I wouldn't be so hard on the USA team. Is a mid-tier squad that has evolved from an amateur team to a team that has actually sent players to professional teams in Europe. At least within CONCACAF, it's Mexico, USA, and Costa Rica the top three favorites. .and yes I know a number of socialists rooting for the USA team. Erik On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Greg McDonald gregm...@gmail.com wrote: Well, Algeria tied England, which is arguably a victory in and of itself. It would be cool to see Algeria beat the USA, but the latter is not exactly an imperialist powerhouse on the pitch. The USA is barely a second-rate squad. Greg Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] He should rot in hell BUT A PARTICULAR HELL
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Most torture and criminal techniques used by the Arg military after 1955 were taught by the French Military Mission, established 1956. Should he rot in a hell of submarinos secos, submarinos húmedos, picanas, caídas al vacío desde un avión, falsos fusilamientos, desapariciones y robos de niños. And hope that while he is in Hell he watches France become a wretch of what it was, thanks to his great contribution to political democracy. 2010/6/20 Louis Proyect l...@panix.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == NY Times June 18, 2010 Gen. Marcel Bigeard, French Hero of 3 Wars, Dies at 94 By MAÏA DE LA BAUME PARIS — Gen. Marcel Bigeard, one of France’s most decorated veterans, who led troops in the French Resistance in World War II and in wars in Algeria and Indochina, died Friday in Toul, France, where he lived. He was 94. His death was confirmed by his wife, Gabrielle Grandemange. General Bigeard, who was wounded in battle five times and escaped from prisoner-of-war camps three times, achieved legendary status in France. Nicknamed “the Heroic Bigeard” by Charles de Gaulle, he participated in battles against the Nazis and against rebels in the French colonies of Indochina and Algeria. “He has been called the best paratrooper in the world,” Martin Windrow, a British military historian, told The Associated Press, “and whatever the truth of that, he most certainly has a claim as the most battle-proven.” In 1954, he parachuted with his battalion into the besieged French base of Dien Bien Phu, in Indochina, and fought the Vietminh, the Vietnamese Communist and nationalist forces, until France’s defeat in 1954. In the midst of Algeria’s war of independence from France, his parachute regiment regained control of Algiers, the capital, in 1957. A profile of General Bigeard (who was a colonel at the time) in Time magazine in 1958 captured his tough-as-nails persona: “A martinet, but the idol of his men, Bigeard whipped them into shape by running them as much as 15 miles at a time. He made them shave every day, no matter where they were, doled out raw onions instead of the traditional wine ration because ‘wine reduces stamina.’ ” Born in Toul in 1916, Marcel Bigeard started his career as a bank clerk before joining the French Army in 1939. He was captured by the Germans in June 1940, but escaped a year later to join the colonial infantry in Senegal. In 1944 he parachuted into France to lead an underground Resistance group. General Bigeard served in the army until 1974, retiring as a four-star general before being appointed deputy defense minister under President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing and later, a legislator in France’s lower house of Parliament. His reputation was tarnished in 1999 when he revealed to Agence France-Presse, after the release of one of his war memoirs, that the French military had used torture during the Algerian war. In July 2000, he declared that torture in Algeria had been a “necessary evil,” and described it as “a mission given by the political powers.” But he never specified whether he had taken part. General Bigeard wrote 16 books, most of them memoirs, and received among others honors, the Grand Croix de la Légion d’Honneur, one of France’s highest distinctions, as well as the Medal of the Resistance and the Distinguished Service Order from the British government. Besides his wife, he is survived by a daughter, Marie-France. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] When criticizing the ANC don´t forget th is
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Source:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may/23/israel-south-africa-nuclear-weapons [The South African government has declassified documents that prove, to any practical effect, not only that Israel had and has nuclear bombs but also that the Israeli government, by the intermediation of no other than Shimon Peres, entered in conversations with the Apartheid regime in order to provide nuclear warheads to the white supremacist regime in Pretoria. The final lines of the journalistic piece run like this, and I would advice any serious Marxist to take them in account because the true kernel of socialist internationalism lies in considering the globe as a class war arena where the stakes are /global, not local/, and involve /all classes, not just a sometimes hyped working class/:] Israel pressured the present South African government not to declassify documents obtained by Polakow-Suransky [the researcher who disclosed this]. The Israeli defence ministry tried to block my access to the Secment agreement on the grounds it was sensitive material, especially the signature and the date, he said. The South Africans didn't seem to care; they blacked out a few lines and handed it over to me. The ANC government is not so worried about protecting the dirty laundry of the apartheid regime's old allies. By Israel read the Israeli bourgeois-Zionist regime, and by South African government read the South African bourgeois-semicolonial regime. It looks like the latter doesn't answer to past grievances in the same way the South African bourgeois-sepoy regime of white supremacy. Shouldn´t a Marxist take this into account? -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] When criticizing the ANC don´t forget th is
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == No, they are not SA commentators. They are hybris-ridden outside charlatans. 2010/5/25 Patrick Bond pb...@mail.ngo.za: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Néstor Gorojovsky wrote: Facts, however, are facts. Some people Who are these SA commentators who annoy you companero? -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Surprise unnecessary [was Re: When criti cizing the ANC don´t forget this]
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/5/25 Patrick Bond pb...@mail.ngo.za: Would you agree - since facts are facts - that socio-economically the majority of black people have lower incomes and worse political-ecological conditions since 1994? This country has changed enormously since Botha, and mostly for the better because race is not an official source of oppression. But for poor black people, this is a country with many more ghastly problems caused by ANC crony capitalism plus repression, than by residual apartheid. I take your word. Which does not imply that absence of race as a source of repression is less important than it was. Didn´t we _know_ that once these constraints were opened capitalism would reign fully? Have we ever had any confidence in unleashed capitalism bringing anything good to the working people? ... The behavior of the ANC government can be humiliating, or not, if you are a bourgeois patriot of South Africa. If you are a Marxist, these things should be expected. What matters, however, is not who discovered the thing but who did help it be discovered. On the other side, I would think it twice if, in the current world, I was the President of a socialist South Africa, I had proof that Israel has the Bomb, and someone told me Hey, boy, let us disclose this. My first question would be what good does this do to the cause of the South Africans. I'm surprised. For most of us, the first question is: What is good for ending the last colonial outpust? South Africa has a huge potential role, in getting Israel BDS up and running. We started last year in Durban, with a temporary halt to unloading of Israeli ships: www.zcommunications.org/durban-for-palestine-via-bds-by-patrick-bond Hats up for you! But there is no need to be surprised. Your question is general, mine is more to a particular point, which is how to do in order to keep that country, with a huge potential role, safe enough to play that role without inner disturbances, attempts of coup, and so on. However, and now more seriously, I am nobody to talk on things South African. ... Best, and miss you. Hope you can have a good time during the World Cup. BTW, we did not talk this over in BA when we met, so that I don´t know if you are interested in football. Yes indeed, comrade. Have a look here, at our World Cup Watch: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/ccs/default.asp?2,40,5,2037 Then don´t expect Argentina to play a most important role. Sad to say it, but I hope I am wrong. In 1986, true, our team seemed to have no chance and it ended with the Cup. But this time, hmmm. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Question on the Far Right
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Joaquín´s e-mail couldn´t be more on the point. A corollary is that any (repeat: any) move that tends to slow down, or, in the best panorama, stop up the flow of imperialist super-profits to the imperialist nations must be unreservedly supported by revolutionary Marxists. And the regimes that make those moves, against imperialists, too. This is the actual ground on which the struggle of socialism takes place worldwide. No matter who takes any measure that diminishes that flow, no matter how little it is diminished. Any such movement acts on our behalf. The rest, is or should be silence. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Arg football and Left (was Re: Football: On the Left Wing--St. Pauli surges to the top shelf)
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/5/10 Greg McDonald gregm...@gmail.com: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Nestor Gorojovsky nmg...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, Independiente was founded by socialists in Avellaneda during the early years of the 20th Century. Ahh, perfect. I knew, KNEW, Nestor would not be able to resist such provocations on my part! Of course I was also aware of yesterday's match!! hahahaha. Offline, Greg. Somehow I guessed you were baiting me. But I did not guess you were aware of Sunday´s match. Touché. Best. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] DIE LINKE with 6% in the latest prognoses of the election result in North Rhine Westphalia
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == This meaning, Einde??? 2010/5/9 Einde O'Callaghan eind...@freenet.de: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == According to the latest prognoses DIE LINKE have got about 6% in the state elections in North Rhine Westphalia, the largest state in Germany. If this result holds up during the count the party will have about 12 seats in the next Landtag. Einde O'Callaghan Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Huge march for Venezuelan independence day
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Dear Stuart M., I understand your addendum. And I am sympathetic to the feelings that take you to send it to the list. But. (I may be wrong, and I hope I am wrong.) But, honestly, this Socialism of the 21st Century smells a lot like Peronist Justicialismo. In both cases, it was never completely clear what the whole thing was about. But PRACTICE explained away any doubt. At any rate, one of the possible views of Peronism, which I learnt from Louis Proyect here, is that it was a peculiarly Saint Simonian alliance between the nationalist wing of the Armed Forces and the working class. The Armed Forces acting as surrogates for a bourgeoisie without class consciousness nor, of course, the guts to fight against imperialist dependence. If we consider Socialism a form of Socialism, well, then Justicialism was the Socialism of the 20th Century. The differences between the Vnzl and Arg versions, in my own way to see it, are accidental and not essential. I insist. What makes Chávez dangerous, and made Perón dangerous (the same happened with Vargas) was their clear consciousness of the necessity of union. BTW: this is what made Abraham Lincoln dangerous, too, and not his views on slavery. 2010/4/21 Stuart Munckton stuartmunck...@gmail.com: -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] The Roots of Stalin in the Tea Party Movement
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/4/18 David Thorstad bin...@gvtel.com: The Tea Party movement's dirty little secret is that its chief financial backers owe their family fortune to the granddaddy of all their hatred: Stalin's godless empire of the USSR. The secretive oil billionaires of the Koch family, the main supporters of the right-wing groups that orchestrated the Tea Party movement, would not have the means to bankroll their favorite causes had it not been for the pile of money the family made working for the Bolsheviks in the late 1920s and early 1930s, building refineries, training Communist engineers and laying down the foundation of Soviet oil infrastructure. The comrades were good to the Kochs. Today Koch Industries has grown into the second-largest private company in America. With an annual revenue of $100 billion, the company was just $6.3 billion shy of first place in 2008. Ownership is kept strictly in the family, with the company being split roughly between brothers Charles and David Koch, who are worth about $20 billion apiece and are infamous as the largest sponsors of right-wing causes. Maybe due to the fact that the family has direct knowledge that socialism CAN work? -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Universal jurisdiction put to test (and something more, as a bonus) Re: Argentines Try Probing Crimes of Franco's Spain
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == This will be THE test to the theses on universal jurisdiction. I would bet that while it is perfectly acceptable that European courts try Chilean or Argentinean Thugs, it will hardly be accepted that an Arg Court tries Spanish thugs. Let us wait and see... BTW: the Spanish Civil War left in Arg a deeper trace than elsewhere, due to a host of reasons. Four of these: a) recent migration from Spain and Italy of _both_ philo-Fascists and Left wingers b) absolute indifference of the masses towards local politics, hijacked by professional politicians in the service of the British Empire during the 1930s c) strong influence of the Left (with or without inverted commmas) on the consciousness of the middle classes, a form of cultural alienation d) worship of the local right wing Catholic Nationalists for the Francoite side All this, cast in the general Eurocentric consciousness of the middle classes in the large towns and areas of the Pampa region where foreign (mainly Italian) migrants had managed to establish a solid agrarian middle class. It is most revealing to show that one of the most progressive politicians of the time, Amadeo Sabattini, was a neutralist (a reasonably national-bourgeois position) in the conflict while at the same time he was socially progressive, thoroughly democratic and very popular. In fact, one of the reasons for this strange mixture was that a good deal of his own social base of voters were children of the recent Italian migration to Argentina, who kept some lovingly feelings towards Italy -which by those times was Fascist Italy! Thus, Sabattini had to both play games towards the global democratic camp (he was even married to a Communist Party member) and towards the global totalitarian camp (by way of neutralism). 2010/4/18 Greg McDonald gregm...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/04/14/world/AP-LT-Argentina-Spain-Human-Rights.html?_r=2partner=rssemc=rss Argentines Try Probing Crimes of Franco's Spain By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Published: April 14, 2010 -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Kyn and Scottish/Bremen Schools
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Went to Kyn´s article, and found out a most interesting thing. If Kyn is quite solid in his denunciation of the schools of Scotland and Bremen as at best ill-researchers of the sources they quote, it looks like this is a debate between misquoters. Kyn states that among his students there is a Federico Morchio, Minister, Argentina. You can be absolutely certain that this Morchio has never been Minister at the Federal level in Argentina, ever. At most, he was chief of cabinet in the Secretary for Industry, Commerce and Small/medium enterprises during the early, and most neoliberal, moments of the Kirchner administration (2003). His being a minister has to do with a third rank position in the Arg Diplomatic Service, where he seems to be acting on secondary or third-rank issues related to Foreign Direct Investment. A typical position-eater of the neoliberal breed, a grey bureaucrat that either has duped Kyn into believing he has got a ministerial rank, either has been presented by Kyn as still another neoliberal pupil of his in the former neoliberal paradise of Argentina. If Kyn´s remaining examples of students and colleagues are consistent, I would think it twice before calling this man a market socialist, BTW. What I believe is that both Kyn and the two schools belong to the same gender of budget nipping intellectuals. They just cater to different buyers. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Katyn' (not Stalin, not Trotsky)
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/4/11 Louis Proyect l...@panix.com: The focus is on the class struggle today and not digging into the Russian questions. I would advise comrades not to get drawn into a discussion about Katyn in this light. Won't get drawn into the Russian questions, certainly. However, I would ask if debating the current propaganda wave against the fSU is a dead dog or a living Leviathan. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] [microsound] El camino hasta la autogestion
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Entonces, ¿el castellano se ha aceptado como idioma oficial de la lista? Si es así, sugiero que la discusión sobre las asambleas, etc., se oriente hacia un problema concreto: el de cómo superar el burocratismo creciente que está aferrando desde adentro la Revolución Bolivariana. Debo decir que no es nada que me sorprenda. Los movimientos bonapartistas nacional burgueses en América Latina se burocratizan por motivos estructurales, al parecer. Si se les da suficiente tiempo, a todos les sucede lo mismo, al menos hasta ahora. Esta burocratización termina por desalentar a las masas. Y esto termina con una contrarrevolución, que puede asumir diversas maneras. En Venezuela, hoy, se corre un riesgo cierto de que en las próximas legislativas venza la oposición antibolivariana. En ese caso, habremos dado un enorme paso atrás en la lucha por el socialismo en América Latina. Y no porque el chavismo sea socialista, precisamente. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Shame on the Arg Left and their behavior on March 24th
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Those interested in a biased but not inaccurate (particularly as to what happened on March 24th last in May Square, Buenos Aires) rendering of the lunacy and politically suicidal behavior of the anti-Peronist Left these days (in Spanish, sorry), please refer to http://www.rodolfowalsh.org/spip.php?article1823 The author is a left wing Peronist, so that the article has some bias against the Left (though it also explains the reasons of that bias) and it makes some mistakes, like generalizations of the position of the Arg Comm Party which were not always as widespread as this report comments. However, the general picture is not wrong though blurred in the details. And perhaps those who actually want to know what bad service this left makes to any revolution (not to speak of socialism) in Argentina will realize this by carefully reading what did they do to the Mothers and Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo when they discovered that these women would not bend to their wishes. The bias against the Left is the first thing serious revolutionary Marxists in Argentina have to deal with when talking to the working class. THAT is the service this Left is making to foreign imperialism. Either by stupidity or other reasons. The results are simple: establishing a gap as wide as possible between the workers and Marxism. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Calling all rebels
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I also guess that, as Luois Pr has commented, the situation forces some people to arrive at conclusions they have shunned for years. It is the bird in the coal mine, as Louis said. Perhaps he never needed to self-censorship himself... But times are a-changing... 2010/3/8 farmela...@juno.com farmela...@juno.com: Over on the A-List, someone wondered how this possibly could be the same Chris Hedges who wrote for the NY Times, since she did not recall him ever writing anything remotely resembling this there. Good question. I suppose that he was at the NY Times, he engaged in a lot of self-censorship. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] URL for full text, in Spanish, of the Dec laración de Cancún
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == The web site belongs to the Cuban Min of Foreign Relations. In order to understand the importance the Cubans attach to the declaration, and the reasons why it has been published so fast and in such an important way, please keep in mind that Cuba has been struggling ever since the Punta del Este meeting of the OAS (OEA in Spanish) to break the isolation that US-compliant Latin American regimes imposed on the revolution. The Cubans have not always found the proper and adequate road (in fact, IMHO, they can be criticized deeply and in fact they have already done so for the _means_ they chose). But the general direction of their march has never changed. With these bearings in mind, it is that they are so jubilant on this issue. The declaration can be found in: http://america.cubaminrex.cu/Actualidad/2010/Febrero/declaracion%20cancun.html -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Long posting on the Arg Debt / Central Bank / Left debate
, which is the extraordinary agrarian rent. We can see that. Know what? We shall resort to part of the reserves, so we can guarantee all of you, dear usuriers, that you will have a good reason not to mistrust us during the negotiations, and thus charge lower rates both to the government _and to private firms asking for foreign loans to foster production schemes_. In so doing, by the way, we shall liberate parts of the domestic budget from their current destination, which is payments of foreign debt at high rates, and use those parts to further fuel the national economy. Would you agree to that? The financial stablishment, of course, received the whole thing with mixed feelings. Some were tempted, others were outraged. But Martin Redrado (originally, Hernán Pérez, a name he changed for public exposure out of sheer snobbery), the head of the Central Bank, a man Kirchner had appointed almost six years ago in an attempt to calm down the international financial gang, stroke an agreement with the media group _Clarín_ and the main representatives of the opposition to use this typical peddlers´ bargain as a launching pad for a major scandal against the Government. He decided not to deliver the reserves that the Executive requested. Immediately, he was asked to resign. He resisted. The whole opposition rallied around him. A brutal campaign around the independence of the Central Bank (that is, around the right of the financial sector to stranglehold the economy) set in. And the Leftists, what did they do? Did they understand that what was at stake? Not only they didn´t but particularly through Solanas they began to shout Foreign debt, foreign debt. They began to take a principled position exactly at the moment when the whole establishment had mounted an operation against the government over the really basic principle that the Central Bank must be independent. By thus skirting the main issue, the Left uses the foreign debt as an alibi. Yes, an alibi to cover up their objective collussion with the extreme forms of the Right against the national government. And, by the way, this collussion, as we told above, serves the purpose of impeding the Government any layoff in the domestic economy, not, as you dear David have thought, any suction of popular income to pay for the debt. This is exactly the other way round. However, what happened in the end? That the Kirchners, when they observed how intractable the financial sector is, gave up their original plan (which was to replace the neoliberal but unruly Redrado with an equally neoliberal but supposedly more amenable Mario Blejer at the head of the Central Bank), and have just imposed over the Central Bank a Left wing developmentist, Mercedes Marcó del Pont, to the foaming rage of the establishment! Yes, this is what actually happened in this teapot storm. due to many other reasonsIt was, among other reasons, in order to follow these policies, although of course not in prevention of a crisis they may well have not been fully aware of (but ), that they tried to modify the foreign trade tariffs, particularly those applied David Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] I rest my case
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/2/7 Leonardo Kosloff holmof...@hotmail.com: Well, since you are asking so nicely Gorojovsky, I think this Jorge Giles really writes for the ‘giles’ What else could be expected from a sepoy leftist? The deep conviction that the Arg people are all fools and any bourgeois smartass can show them a carrot and take them far away from what the Enlightened Left has to offer is still as alive as it was in 1945, when this is exactly the way the Communist newsletter Orientación illustrated the main article on October 17th. The article by Jorge Giles is weak in theory and strong in facts. But what LK believes is that these facts are not facts, they are just fulbito para la tribuna (nice games to entertain the public) I rest my case. This is the main thrust of the Arg Left, in all its sad glory. This is why they put such a bad name on everything that would be seriously called Left in this country. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] The Iñigo Carreras [Re: To have it all backwards]
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Yes, the Iñigo Carreras are a family of long and important standing in our sepoy Left. Juan´s father, if I am not wrong, was a very important leader in that Socialist Party that took by assault the unions under the surveillance of the Navy after 1955. The Party that gave an Ambassador to Portugal to Videla in 1976. The Ambassador that had misquoted Shakespear in 1956 at the sight of the shootings of Peronists in June that the milk of clemency had ended. Anyway, I prefer Juan Iñigo Carrera to many others. In his attempt to write the way Marx did, from time to time, he hits some lode. Though he never realizes what does that lode mean. 2010/2/7 Louis Proyect l...@panix.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Leonardo Kosloff wrote: How does capital accumulate in Argentina? Why is the working class to do this? is explained here http://www.cicpint.org/jinigo/articulos/argentina/articulo%20HM.pdf by Juan Iñigo Carrera, (particularly page 9 through page 20, and page 32 through 35). For Gorojovsky, however, he should read with an open scientific mind, if he can, ‘La formación económica de la sociedad Argentina’, also by Juan Iñigo Carrera. This must be the same Juan Iñigo who was a subscriber to the very first Marxism list on the Internet. We used to get big laughs out of his attempt to write as if he were Karl Marx's avatar. Here's a sample of his prose. If anybody ever finds me writing nonsense like this, they have permission to throw a custard pie in my face: http://www.cicpint.org/cicp/congreso%20marx%20int/Juan%20Inigo_Presentation%20english.pdf The need inherent within the capitalist mode of production to develop itself towards its own overcoming into the general conscious organization of social production immediately presents us with the process of the development of consciousness. A consciousness able to organize the totality of the process of social production must have attained the power inherent in the fullness of objective knowledge, that is, it needs to be a completely free consciousness. Nevertheless, it can not reach this condition as an offspring of the previous overcoming of the capitalist mode of production. On the contrary, this overcoming is the offspring of the complete development of free consciousness. Therefore, complete free consciousness must necessarily be the most genuine product of the capitalist mode of production itself. More concretely yet, it must needs be the product of the social subject that the capitalist mode of production objectively determines as the bearer of its own overcoming, resulting from the same process in which the subject undertakes this overcoming. In a nutshell, the consciousness in question can only be developed as the product of the political action of the working class in the process of overcoming the capitalist mode of production. This action takes, as its necessary concrete form, the advance in the socialization of private labor by means of the centralization of capital as an alienated social property, which is to say, as property of the state. The consciousness of the working class able to overcome the capitalist mode of production can only be developed as a concrete necessary moment of the aforementioned process of capital centralization. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Acres and hectares
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Sorry, 250 hectares are NOT 1000 acres. There is .44 hectares in an acre. So what some (not me) are saying is that Solanas owns some 550 acres of soy bean plantations. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Fossils laid bare (second part)
(sometimes by quite unhappy methods, BTW) that socialists outside the core countries should give away any serious organizing so they would allow the bourgeois stage to come to its happy ending. The results of this have been widely known, and won´t return to them. A reaction to this sad and grim suggestion was that the idea that in fact the bourgeois stage was equally ended in Ouagadougou, in Tokyo, in Beijing or in Stockholm. The results are still deployed. In countries such as Argentina, the result is simply that he Left denounces not just the bourgeoisie (a mythical bourgeoisie, by the way, where petty scoundrels like any little shop owner are equated to Nelson Rockefeller) but -and this is the serious thing- the absolutely rational (and radical, and revolutionary) will of the masses of the country to take to completion the bourgeois tasks. Which, first and foremost, imply national liberation from imperialism and, in the case of Argentina, the re-unification of South America as a first step towards that of Latin America as a whole. This will, as explained by a Lev Davidovich Bronstein, forces the revolution into a socialist stage in a process that he suggested to define as permanent revolution. But permanent revolution, in Trotsky´s mind, did BY NO MEANS imply that the socialists should wage a war against the local national bourgeois movements in alliance with the local representations of imperialist power. When such Leftists explain that Argentina is fully capitalist, what they say is, in fact, that socialists must struggle, first and foremost, against the bourgeoisie, because this bourgeoisie is fully welded to imperialist interest and, in fact, is the very representative of imperialism in the country. Evidence against this silly word of faith is absolutely disregarded, of course. The fact that nobody did more to strangle the Argentinean march towards the completion of bourgeois revolution after 1976 was NOT the bourgeoisie but imperialism and the oligarchy is hidden by those foolish and senseless generalizations (which remind one of the basic tenet of bourgeois economists, according to which market relations and capitalism are one and the same thing) the only purpose of which is, however, to take sides with imperialism against the people of the country you live in. It is an OBJECTIVE purpose, I am not saying that Leftists understand this. It is precisely to impede them this understanding that sepoy Leftism exists. It is not personal. It is social and political. And, politically and socially, for example, when an Argentinean government puts an end to the dictatorship of monetarists in the Central Bank, and places a left wing Keynesian developmentist there, a gesture that has put the whole proimperialist bloc against it, these Leftists warn the workers not to fall prey of bourgeois illusions, to remain isolated of the whole of the society, and to leave the government in isolation too. So that it will fall down, not to the benefit of the Leftists, but of the actual truth hidden in their musings, the historic truth that they have served, once again, imperialist interest by detaching masses of the middle classes from the national front exactly when they were most necessary. This is what is happening in Argentina today. This is all the truth behind the bombast of this Left with the foreign debt issue. This is what Kosloff means in Argentina. Bye -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] On the fatidic role of the Left in Argentina
tendrían mejores posibilidades con Cobos o Macri de presidentes, por aquello de cuanto peor, mejor. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Spa, short intro Eng] A reasonable Marxist position on the Arg Central Bank / Foreign Debt issue
gobierno que rectifique su política de pagar deuda externa con divisas y/o recursos presupuestarios. Debemos apoyarlo en su decreto de cesantía de Redrado. Y plantearle que haya inmediatamente un proyecto de nueva ley de entidades financieras para acabar con la que viene de Adolfo Diz-Martínez de Hoz y la dictadura militar. También hay que reclamarle que se dicte una nueva carta orgánica del Central, que lo vincule con la producción, el empleo y el desarrollo nacional. Con respecto a la deuda externa es cierto que gobiernos anteriores, incluso Kirchner con el canje de 2005, la legalizaron. Pero eso no significa que no pueda y deba revisarse. Siempre se está a tiempo de defender el interés nacional, por lo que desde el PL planteamos que el gobierno declare una suspensión de pagos y haga un análisis de la deuda, similar a lo que hizo el año pasado el presidente Rafael Correa, de Ecuador. Así se pagará sólo lo que corresponda. No aceptamos el falso “tercerismo” que iguala al gobierno democrático con la oposición destituyente. No es lo mismo Cristina que Cobos, Macri, Carrió, De Narváez y Duhalde. No es lo mismo Mercedes Marcó del Pont que Redrado. No es lo mismo Página/12 y Canal 7 que el monopolio Clarín. No son lo mismo los juicios a los genocidas que la amnistía pedida por Guelar (PRO). No es lo mismo la participación en Unasur que la simpatía opositora por los fascistas Uribe y Piñera. Llamamos a todas las fuerzas de izquierda auténtica, de centroizquierda y progresistas, a los kirchneristas más decididos, a los diversos sectores nacionales y populares, a movilizarnos unidos para golpear duro sobre la asociación ilícita de Cobos-Redrado-Clarín y fondos buitres. Y en ese marco pedir al gobierno nacional las rectificaciones y cambios políticos que en 2010 ya no caben excusas para no hacer y que por no hacerlos a tiempo se le están volviendo en contra. COMITÉ CENTRAL DEL PARTIDO DE LA LIBERACIÓN (PL) Buenos Aires, 13 de enero de 2010 www.pl.org.ar -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Oh, Rosa...
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == 2010/1/17 S. Artesian sartes...@earthlink.net: And what bullshit is sprayed about as standing with Marx and Engels. So much for Nestor's self-anointed pious silence. I was just sighing in public. Am I forbidden by Master Schanoes to deplore the bad luck of poor Rosa Luxemburg? Qui s´excuse s´accuse. What the above means is that among what Schanoes calls bullshit is all that Lenin and Trotsky had to say against what they considered Rosa´s mistakes. BTW: what English calls pious and Spanish piadoso don´t overlap fully. There is a particular sense of piadoso that the English pious does not convey, which is that of sadly deploring other people´s fate, situation, condition or behavior, for the consequences they bring on that very people. This requires no ointment at all. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] OK, you win Master Sch. / and a BTW
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh sigh Bye, you different tradition... *** BTW, when I say that I am too busy, please read too busy to deal seriously, carefully and in depth with chatterboxes with no interest for the political goals of revolution in Argentina. That is a job others do superbly on Marxmail and at last I have learnt that it was not my task at all. But I did _never_ mean to be too busy to make fun of Master Schanoes with some incidental remark. Or to bait him into rage with some side comment, and see if he catches the bait. Don´t for a second believe, Gospodar Schanoes, that if I considered it useful and necessary to smash your positions to the empty hollowness they actually are. Not you in person, Herr Schanoes, not you at all. I am, just like all of my comrades and as you have very well put, Schanoes Adoní, a phisical coward who hides behind a computer screen and never faces enemies -save for some policemen and military during mass mobilisations in Argentina, 1972 onwards. Not you then. After some menace you made to me, I have decided never to step on the US of Am or anywhere that lies at less than 7000 kilometers of NYCity. Not you, Signore Schanoes, just the positions you espouse. I expect you will keep making me smile with your responses, Maître Schanoes. While the moderator doesn´t ask me to stop with it, I will keep pinching you. It is a funny sport. And up to this moment, it has offered some me of the best laughs in the day. What was it that the Reader´s Digest said, that laughter was a sure medicine? Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] A correction to OK, you win Master Sch. / and a BTW
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Where I wrote, full of fear and horror at the very thought of Almighty Schanoes rumbling on me like a locomotive (you see, we do have something in common, which is a love for railroading although, as always, Godlike Schanoes, nay, Godhimself Schanoes -sorry- has the better side on me because -and this I really envy- he works or has worked in the field!), well, where, shaken by fear the way winds shake a bunch of miserable hanging moss in a magnolia forest during a hurricane, I wrote Don´t for a second believe, Gospodar Schanoes, that if I considered it useful and necessary to smash your positions to the empty hollowness they actually are. Not you in person, Herr Schanoes, not you at all. I am, just like all of my comrades and as you have very well put, Schanoes Adoní, a phisical coward who hides behind a computer screen and never faces enemies -save for some policemen and military during mass mobilisations in Argentina, 1972 onwards. I must be understood to have wanted to write, hadn´t panic put me out of my senses: Don´t for a second believe, Gospodar Schanoes, that if I considered it useful and necessary to smash your positions to the empty hollowness they actually are anything or anybody would refrain me from doing so. Not even my notorious problems with English. But not you in person, Herr Schanoes, not you at all. I am, just like all of my comrades and as you have very well put, Schanoes Adoní, a phisical coward who hides behind a computer screen and never faces enemies -save for some policemen and military during mass mobilisations in Argentina, 1972 onwards. Best, on too warm a Summer morning in humid Buenos Aires not to feel some fun on my ponderous enemy won´t help me getting along through the day. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] OK you win .....
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == No, Dennis, be reassured. It is representative of the most oppressed and combative masses of the Arg people. Just that. The Left is well represented by the likes of Kosloff and other similar people. That is why the Arg workers have dug it under more than six feet sixty five years ago. That is why the Arg Left, that mainstream Left, will never (nor does want any more, if it ever wanted) lead our working class anywhere but to disaster. 2010/1/17 Dennis Brasky dmozart1...@gmail.com: == Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == If this drivel is at all representative of the Argentinian left - OY -- Forwarded message -- From: Néstor Gorojovsky nmg...@gmail.com Date: 2010/1/17 Subject: OK, you win Master Sch. / and a BTW Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Freya von Moltke, Part of a Core of Nazi Resistance, Is Dead at 98
) of the newly found German Empire (or Reich) at Versailles while the Parisians rose up in the Commune against this and the greedy machinations of Thiers and the haute bourgoisie who dined with Kaiser and Bismarck at Versailles. The circle and the Moltke family benefited from the immense prestige of Count Moltke’s military ancestor. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Easier yet [Re: Salvadoran VP to visit Cuba -- first such contact in 48 years]
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Perhaps there´s an easier explanation. Funes shit his pants. From the structural point of view, El Salvador is a Honduras to the nth power. 2009/12/4 Fred Feldman ffeld...@bellatlantic.net: Dave is right, as was Greg who posted shortly before I did. I was not up to date on El Salvador. There is deepening polarization among the forces representing change in Latin America. Funes' vague support for the elected successor to the coup regime is one signal, but more important is his break process with the FMLN. El Salvador was ultra-polarized long before Honduras. As in Nicaragua, the civil war still lives, and also the US role in it. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] [Spanish, sorry] My cde. Battistoni answers to some rrrrrrevolutionaries
. El capital estatal se encuentra entrelazado al capital extranjero en la industria petrolera y, de un modo general, en la creciente deuda pública y externa, en tanto que las nacionalizaciones no entrañaron una expropiación del capital sino un intercambio entre activos productivos o bancarios por generosas indemnizaciones de fuente pública. En estos términos, una V Internacional para este Socialismo del Siglo XXI supone una regresión respecto de las cuatro internacionales previas, no exclusivamente sobre la IV o III; es, incluso, un contrasentido histórico. No hace falta decir que se pone atrás de la I Internacional, que abogaba por la acción colectiva del proletariado de los principales países para una emancipación de los trabajadores por los trabajadores mismos. Chávez, pero más que nada sus seguidores ‘marxistas', confunden interesadamente la centralización revolucionaria que desarrolla un partido de clase con la que ejerce un caudillo bonapartista. El bonapartismo busca siempre un apoyo en las masas, es cierto, pero lo hace mediante la regimentación y es un opositor violento a su acción libre y autoemancipadora. Esta confusión ha convertido al bonapartismo de masas en un ‘hecho maldito' de la sociedad burguesa, sea ésta la francesa de Napoleón, incluso la alemana de Bismarck y, por cierto, la argentina y venezolana del primer Perón y de Chávez. Dicho todo esto, es incontrovertible que es necesaria una Internacional revolucionaria, en especial ante la gigantesca bancarrota capitalista mundial. Nuestro partido planteó una campaña en torno a esta tarea a partir de la crisis mundial y de las restauraciones capitalistas. El tema está objetivamente en la agenda y hasta en las gateras. Para eso es necesario comenzar por algo concreto, no a partir de divagaciones en auditorios absurdos. Ese algo concreto es discutir el programa de la última internacional, la IV –cuya vigencia ha crecido en muchos aspectos, en lugar de disminuir, en especial por la confirmación de su pronóstico sobre la restauración capitalista que la burocracia incubada en el país del ‘socialismo real'. Esta discusión y las conclusiones que se vayan desprendiendo de ella en términos de acción, son el punto de partida de la Internacional que podrá aprovechar la bancarrota capitalista en desarrollo, para poner fin al capitalismo. Jorge Altamira -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Venezuela, Colombia and the threat of war in Latin America
The threat is actual. No kidding. Border incidents have already begun. 2009/11/10 Stuart Munckton stuartmunck...@gmail.com: http://www.greenleft.org.au/2009/817/42020 Venezuela, Colombia and the threat of war in Latin America Kiraz Janicke, Caracas 7 November 2009 *The possibility of an imperialist war in the Americas came a step closer on October 30, when Colombia and the United States finalised a 10-year accord. The agreement allows the US to hugely expand its military presence in the Latin American nation.* -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Fwd: [A-List] Why the international media lies about events in Latin America
, 2009. [4] http://www.liberation.fr/monde/0101593847-le-honduras-s-enfonce-dans-la-crise. [5] It is interesting at this point to note the initiative of Hugo Chavez’ government on April 11, 2008, six years after the putsch. The government used its right to broadcast on the private and public TV stations to show a re-run of the entire reportage produced by the anti-Chavist private channels (Globovisión, RCTV) on the official inauguration session of the president and the putschist government in a reception room in the Miraflores presidential palace. The complete program was re-broadcast without any cuts or critical commentary by the Chavez government. Chavez relied on the critical acumen of Venezuelan viewers to form their own opinion on the active complicity of the private media with those behind the putsch, among whom the viewer could identify the leading Catholic church authorities, the putschist military brass, the head of the anti-Chavist labour union CTV (Confederation of Workers of Venezuela), the chief executives of private corporations and the president of the Venezuelan Federation of Chambers of Commerce (Fedecámaras), Pedro Carmona. It should be said that Carmona, who held power for scarcely 36 hours, earned the enduring nickname of “Pepe el breve” (Pepe the brief). [6] On February 23, 1981, an attempted coup d’état organised by Francoist sectors took place in the Spanish congress. The leader, Colonel Tejero, held the members of parliament present at gunpoint and took them hostage as the new president of the government was being sworn in. [7] See https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html, consulted in March 2009. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Where is Trotsky St.?
Also in: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=R.+Trotsky+-+Cid.+Cont.+-+Setor+%C3%81sia,+Serra+-+ES,+Braziloe=utf-8client=firefox-aie=UTF8hl=enct=clnkcd=1geocode=FQ5jy_4dAj6a_Qsplit=0 Which lies in Serra, Espírito Santo, Brasil. 2009/10/24 Greg McDonald saboca...@gmail.com: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=trotsky%20streetoe=utf-8rls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialclient=firefox-aum=1ie=UTF-8sa=Nhl=entab=wl Haha, That's really too much. Trotsky St. interesects with the Martyrs of Chicago, and is two blocks down from Josef Stalin and three blocks from Emiliano Zapata St. Mexico City, of course. YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] when will the Palestinian people deal with the traitors?
Certainly the Israeli and USAmerican peoples deal with theirs 2009/10/7 Dennis Brasky dmozart1...@gmail.com: http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/oh-people-of-palestineif-not-bulletspray-tellwhere-are-your-shoes/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/05/fatah-hamas-torture-trial http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2006/798/re82.htm YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Daniel Guerin
2009/10/7 Shane Mage shm...@pipeline.com: On Oct 7, 2009, at 5:22 PM, Greg McDonald wrote: I had read Guerin's fine book on anarchism many years ago, but had not read Fascism and Big Business until Shane mentioned it a few months ago on this list. Still working my way through it, but I must say it sure is an excellent book. Could you translate for us the other two titles that you mentioned, Shane? One title: Bourgeois et Bras Nus: La Lutte des Classes sous la Première République. The bourgeoisie and the shirtless ones: the class struggle during the First Republic. Wow. La burguesía y los descamisados: la lucha de clases durante la Primera República. It would be most interesting if someone made a serious history of this issue in Argentina, understanding of course that the First Republic, from the workers´ point of view, has been the first Peronist government (1945 to 1955). The internal class struggle within the national front is a matter worth studying, indeed. Provided, of course, one does not establish as a given and first datum the idea that workers were stupid enough to be duped by the bourgeoisie, etc. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] when will the Palestinian people deal with the traitors?
No need, Dennis. I know Yiddish, and I understand what you mean. BTW, in Spanish it is spelt potz. And the translation is pelotudo. Now, this for you. Up your ass. Sorry, Mr. Moderator, won´t do it again. 2009/10/7 Dennis Brasky dmozart1...@gmail.com: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Néstor Gorojovsky nmg...@gmail.com wrote: Certainly the Israeli and USAmerican peoples deal with theirs does anyone know how to translate putz into espanol;? YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] A mistake Re: when will the Palestinian people deal with the traitors?
Brotherly exchange of insult aside, now I realize that my irksome mail lacked an essential word. I had wanted to write Certainly BEFORE the Israeli and USAmerican peoples deal with theirs, which implies some positive opinion on future events, and not Certainly the Israeli and USAmerican peoples deal with theirs, which is as true as it is abstract and fruitless. Of course all peoples will deal with their traitors some day or other. However, some seem prone to be smarter and quicker in that task. Not that they like the reasons why. But such is life. Now don´t answer again with your illuminated Anglo Yiddish, Brasky. Thank you. And just in case, does anybody know how to translate into English Guei kakn (Spanish spelling, Yddish can be transliterated to many different languages, Brasky)? Ah, and yet another issue with Brasky´s deep linguistics: we in Argentina don´t call español that thing which you USAmericans, quite as idyosincratically as you speak of Hispanos or Hispanic, call Spanish, simply because there are other languages in Spain; we say castellano, that is the language of Castilia in the same way there is no British but English or Welsh. Don´t mention it. 2009/10/7 Néstor Gorojovsky nmg...@gmail.com: No need, Dennis. I know Yiddish, and I understand what you mean. BTW, in Spanish it is spelt potz. And the translation is pelotudo. Now, this for you. Up your ass. Sorry, Mr. Moderator, won´t do it again. 2009/10/7 Dennis Brasky dmozart1...@gmail.com: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Néstor Gorojovsky nmg...@gmail.com wrote: Certainly the Israeli and USAmerican peoples deal with theirs does anyone know how to translate putz into espanol;? YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Character of Assembly Line Work
I would add that the contemplative mood described below is of itself a most demanding job, because it requires full attention of the worker to a most boring process, and diminishes the worker´s abilities to the single ability of pushing buttons. It would be funny if it wasn´t tragic, to stress that the transformation of human beings into things has advanced so deep they are looked on as a lack of effort. Physical effort is only a crude form of the general process of alienation. Lukács had written some most interesting things on this, harping (but finely tuned) on Marx´s great job on alienation, commodity fetishism, etc. 2009/9/25 ehrbar ehr...@lists.econ.utah.edu: Discussion question 263 in my on-line class on Marx's *Capital* is: Do you know production processes in which humans participate without having to spend any effort? Pseudonym Kay answered: A lot of manufacturing jobs actually do not require humans to spend any effort. The technology available today has made it so that most people just sit back and watch as machines take care of all the work ... The most poignant example ... within the automobile industry ... Workers in this industry have been replaced by machines ... Employees are still hired, but most often it seems their job descriptions include pushing a button; this is really not an effort in the real sense of the word. The full answer is here: http://marx.econ.utah.edu/das-kapital/2009fa/115.htm This completely contradicts my own experience as an assembly line worker for Chrysler in Detroit 1971-79. Work was very unequal, a night and day difference between the paint shop which was a modern incarnation of hell, and final assembly. But even final assembly was gruelling hard. I had nightmares for many years afterwards of being in the hole and not being able to catch up. I was not the only one, young men in the prime of their lives, early 20s, were afraid of this work. Lifting the wheels in place and bolting them on could only be done at this breakneck pace if you were very strong and very skilled, you had to be some kind of acrobat to do this. Others, the hilo drivers who had to replenish the stock, thought they had easy work and felt like little privileged kings with their Union wages. And some people on a feeder line had their stock built by lunch time and went home, the foreman punched them out at the end of the day. But in 1973 Chrysler had several months downtime because of the oil embargo. When we came back, they had reorganized the work and much of this slack was removed. Just at the end of my tenure, Chrysler installed the first automatic welders. I only caught the very beginning of the automation, and I don't know how this affected the character of the work elsewhere in the plant. I was assuming final assembly is still about the same as in the 70s, but maybe I am wrong? Has the character changed as Kay describes or is this an urban legend? Someone else wrote the following, which is much more in line with my own experience: I knew someone who worked in [an assembly line] for garden hoses. It was quite a demanding job, physically and mentally. While not too much mental power had to go into the production itself of garden hoses, she had to keep her wits about her. Otherwise she could be seriously hurt by the machinery. The long hours made the job physically hard. Someone else brought up a different point: I think this question would be better if it addressed how many workers in the labor force are getting paid to do nothing. I would say there is a lot more downtime now than when the assembly lines were the only place lower class individuals worked, and worked all day very hard. In a single work day everyone I know is for sure not working every second they are getting paid. I've heard similar complaints from businesses who said: Utah has low wages but in exchange you won't get people to work very hard. Is there some truth to it or is this just my guilt-relief thinking that, since wages are so ridiculously low, people simply don't work very hard? After all, they have to economize their strength for their second and third job. Thank you for your insights. Hans. Hans G. Ehrbar http://www.econ.utah.edu/~ehrbar ehr...@economics.utah.edu Economics Department, University of Utah (801) 581 7797 (my office) 260 S. Central Campus Drive Rm 343 (801) 581 7481 (econ office) Salt Lake City UT 84112-9150 (801) 585 5649 (FAX) YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message
Re: [Marxism] WW2: interimperialist war to redivide the world,
I am not privy to the details of the history of the Phillipines. But a few things I know. I know that the Phillipino patriots of the late XIX century suffered, at the hands of the American Liberators, the same treatment their Cuban counterparts had to endure. Afterwards, some have criminalized them as bourgeois leaders, but this is a different story (Quezón, Rizal, etc.) I know that there was a strong Marxist guerrilla in Phillipines by 1945, and that these guerrillas did not greet American troops, not exactly. 2009/9/20 nada dwalters...@gmail.com: Louis wrote: But it was also a war in the Pacific without any discernible *class* differences between Japanese and American imperialism. It does not matter if Filipinos welcomed in American troops. So that I stand with Louis on this. There is always a bunch of sepoys who greet imperialist troops in the hope that they will be their lapdogs afterwards. It is also usual that these sepoys are depicted as the whole of the people that is about to be turned into a colonial subject. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] WW2: interimperialist war to redivide the world
I think that, in a general perspective, both Lüko and DWalters are right. Because whoever won the dispute over the redistribution would herald the war against the Soviet Union. Both things were the same thing. 2009/9/20 Lüko Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.de: nada (dwalters...@gmail.com) wrote on 2009-09-20 at 09:58:23 in about Re: [Marxism] WW2: interimperialist war to redivide the world: regardless of how one feels about British entry into the war in 1939, was there really a British entry into the war in 1939? I don't think so. What war did the British Empire wage in 1939? It was German imperialism which opened the war for the redistribution of the colonies and could, with the help of the Soviet Union, direct his first strikes against the other imperialist and colonial powers in Wester Europe. or it's aid or not to anti-fascist struggles. I don't know of any. Do you? Tell me! WWII was first and foremost an attack by Fascism against the USSR. This is utter nonsense. The World War 2 was the continuation of what is called World War 1, and which actually form a single inter-imperialist war for the redivision of the world and their colonial empires, just interrupted for an armistice by the Russian Revolution. The carnage could continue after the defeat of the working class in Germany and was inevitable after the victory of fascism in Spain. It was always aimed, first and foremost, against the USSR. Well, why then did nobody wage a war against the USSR until the third year of that war (if we accept the common notion that the attack on Poland enabled by the German-Soviet pact of August 23, 1939, is the official begin of that war, while it actually started rather with the Italien war to conquer Ethiopia and the Japanese war of conquest of China)? No, the interimperialist war of the 20th century from 1914 to 1949 was a war to redivide the world, which was already divided up among the early colonial empires, and which the late comers -- USA, Germany, Italy, Japan -- had redistribute among them according to their real economic and military strength. This was complicated by the existence of the first workers state and by the beginning revolt of the colonial masses, first of all expressed by the Chinese fighting to get their country for themselves instead of Japan or the USA. As to German imperialism -- Hitler clearly spelled out his guiding star: Germany will be a world power, ot it will not be. As Trotsky, leader of the first successful socialist revolution, wrote in 1939 and 1940, German imperialism had not the slightest chance to succeed, but had no other way than to try it. Yours, Lüko Willms Frankfurt, Germany YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Examples of the use of force by American forces against its citizens.
2009/9/11 Mark Lause markala...@gmail.com: Jeez, when have they not Almost every act of violence against native peoples included violence against some U.S. citizens who were living among them. But, I mean, if we see the state as a mechanism for the repression of the society in general in the interests of a ruling class, this question is sort of like asking when the refrigerator behaves in a cold way... ML You are certainly right. But I am afraid that the catholic cat (!) is asking about precise and specific moments of open class warfare, as his list of crimes shows. However, I would make a comment to that list: though it is now usual in the US official ideology to equate first nation warriors with white settler warriors, as if all of them had been equally American citizens, the truth is, as Mark Lause clearly states above, that crimes against the sioux, seminole, apache, whatever, were not considered part of a civil war. The original peoples of what today is US of America were NOT considered US citizens. Correct me if I am wrong, please. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] 25 years ago, an Arg city mobilized against an US fleet
Today is the 25th anniversary of the Madrinazo, the day when the people of the seaside and seaport town of Puerto Madryn, Chubut, took the streets to prevent a USAmerican group of Atlantic South Force battleships to enter harbor. The action was succesful, the fleet could not moor at Madryn, and this was an important component in the build up of the personality of the town. This was the place where the soldiers of the battles of 1982 had been brought after the battles of that year were, por ahora, lost. For the first time, the madrinazo has received official support. -- Mensaje reenviado -- De: José María Cavalleri ingcavall...@yahoo.com.ar Fecha: 10 de septiembre de 2009 08:24 Asunto: [R-P] (PSI).- A 25 AÑOS DEL “MADRINAZO” Para: nmg...@gmail.com Cc: Lucha de masas para recuperar la Argentina reconquista-popu...@lists.econ.utah.edu CITANDO LA FUENTE,EL MATERIAL DE ESTA LISTA ES DE LIBRE REPRODUCCIÓN . PUERTO MADRYN, CHUBUT, 10(PSI).- A 25 AÑOS DEL “MADRINAZO”. Hoy se cumplen 25 años de la emblemática movilización popular contra el desembarco de la flota norteamericana en tierra de Madryn, y por primera vez se conmemorará este hecho histórico entendido como una reacción de la comunidad, espontánea y democrática, reflejo de la expresión de los intereses del pueblo que vale la pena recordar como acto de consolidación de la identidad Madrynense. La comunidad de Puerto Madryn, allá por 1984, se movilizó en de repudio a la flota norteamericana “Atlantic South Force” y a las políticas estatales de Desmalvinización que desconocían los sentimientos de la comunidad madrynense. Vale destacar que finalizada la Guerra de Malvinas en el año 1982, se produjo el regreso de los soldados al continente, en calidad de prisioneros de guerra, y un gran porcentaje de ellos fueron desembarcados en el Muelle local, este hecho fue vivido por toda la comunidad Madrynense, con profunda emoción pese a la negativa de las autoridades de difundir información y posibilitar que la comunidad reciba abiertamente a sus soldados. La flota norteamericana recibió la autorización en septiembre de 1984, por parte del Gobierno Nacional, para amarrar sus buques en el mismo lugar y posibilitar su aprovisionamiento y el desembarco de los marines norteamericanos. Esta decisión desconocía el sentir de la comunidad Madrynense frente a la Guerra de Malvinas y la posguerra, por lo cual entendía dicho arribo como un agravio teniendo en cuenta la participación de Estados Unidos en el conflicto. A partir de esta información la comunidad se organiza a través de una Comisión Multisectorial para canalizar por medios institucionales, las inquietudes que generaba dicha situación. El día nueve de septiembre, el Honorable Concejo Deliberante de la ciudad de Puerto Madryn, en una sesión extraordinaria llevado a cabo un día domingo, declarando “presencia no grata” a dicha flota, reflejando de esta manera el sentir de la comunidad. Pese a ello se produjo igualmente su arribo y se generó entonces una movilización popular de repudio con pancartas y carteles el día 10 de septiembre hacia el muelle Almirante Storni. La Flota, finalmente ante estos hechos, se alejo de la costa reaprovisionándose mar adentro. Este hecho quedó registrado en la memoria colectiva como “Madrynazo”, entendido como una reacción popular, espontánea y democrática de la expresión de los intereses de la comunidad local.- XXX Yahoo! Cocina Encontra las mejores recetas con Yahoo! Cocina. http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/ SI RECONQUISTA-POPULAR LE RESULTA ÚTIL, CONSIDERE LA POSIBILIDAD DE BRINDARLE APOYO FINANCIERO. HAGA UN DEPÓSITO EN LA CUENTA 3-72081/5 DEL BANCO FRANCÉS, O CONTÁCTESE CON recpo...@gmail.com INFORMACIÓN SOBRE LA LISTA Y SUSCRIPCIONES POR VÍA INTERNET: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/reconquista-popular. SUSCRIPCIÓN POR CORREO ELECTRÓNICO: envíe un mensaje escribiendo 'help' sin comillas en el asunto (no escriba nada en el cuerpo del mensaje) a reconquista-popular-requ...@lists.econ.utah.edu EL CORREO ELECTRÓNICO DE LA PERSONA QUE ADMINISTRA LA LISTA ES: reconquista-popular-ad...@lists.econ.utah.edu TODOS LOS MENSAJES DE ESTA LISTA QUEDAN ARCHIVADOS Y PUEDEN CONSULTARSE EN: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/reconquista-popular/ Lista de correo electrónico Reconquista-Popular reconquista-popu...@lists.econ.utah.edu http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/reconquista-popular -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Change for the worse in Argentina
Well, I don´t remember if I established some caveat on my posting: all what I said is concrete, there is no way to establish socialism in Arg today. 2009/9/10 Louis Proyect l...@panix.com: Néstor Gorojovsky wrote: One of the means by which the oligarchy has been defending the extensive agrarian system was to highlight the ecological sense of a system where agriculture was ancillary to husbandry, thus fertilizing the land naturally between crops by putting cattle in cropland every some years. This is absolute nonsense. The system is idiotically unproductive. But if we ever establish socialism on a global scale, this is exactly the way that cattle should be raised. Of course, the amount of land devoted to grazing will be reduced drastically but the meat will be a lot tastier and healthier. I would also take exception to what follows: Interestingly enough, the cattle-rearing techniques in Argentina were adopted from the British countryside of the 1700s during the rise of capitalism when the agrarian gentry put the broader interests of land and water resources over sheer profit. That is why the Brenner thesis is so bogus. Profit maximization hardly describes class relations in the British countryside in the period he finds so critical to the origins of capitalism. Will try to explain later. Not exactly so. By no means. -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Voting with feet, not commendable in Argentina Re: China'shigh speed rail plans
Of course we should have given them all our solidarity. But they were certainly NOT TO THE LEFT OF Perón. Been explaining this on the list long ago. When and if I have time again will expand fully in the future. 2009/9/6 Tom Cod t...@hotmail.com: Why do you say that? Clearly one can have differences with their tactics and strategy, but to say they were not a leftist group or were not to the left of Peron seems dubious and sectarian. Moreover, why then did the Peron regime and its successors do so much to repress and kill them? Surely you don't mean to suggest we shouldn't have solidarity with them? By that logic the Weathermen were to the right of Nixon? (BTW, there was an excellent three hour interview on C-SPAN2 last night with Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 00:07:44 -0300 From: nmg...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Marxism] Voting with feet, not commendable in Argentina Re: China'shigh speed rail plans To: t...@hotmail.com Look, Kosslof, if you think the Montoneros were in any way on Perón´s left, as most standard leftists in Arg believe, then you are so far away from Marxism that, as I guessed, it is pointless to discuss any of these issues with you. _ Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCBpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MSHYCB_BackToSchool_Cashback_BTSCashback_1x1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Voting with feet, not commendable in Argentina Re: China's high speed rail plans,
2009/9/5 Lüko Willms lueko.wil...@t-online.de: S. Artesian (sartes...@earthlink.net) wrote on 2009-09-04 at 10:59:55 in about Re: [Marxism] Voting with feet, not commendable in Argentina Re: China's high speed rail plans,: And what is that issue? Let's review, according to LW and Nestor, the CCP is not bowing down to capitalism, it is using capitalism to build socialism;it is using capitalism to make the Chinese nation stronger; in making the Chinese nation stronger, it, the embrace of capitalism is making the proletariat stronger. No that is not the issue. Or only the issue with what you imagine, but you have to discuss your own products of your own fantasy with those people dealing with your mind, but not with me. What you attribute to me is completely the product of YOUR OWN IMAGINATION. So, no need to deal with the rest of your stuff. Really, S. Artesian, neither did I suggest this that you think I suggested. Please, use some degree of dialectical thinking as I have seen you use many times on this list... -- Néstor Gorojovsky El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autoría YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com