Bob,
Anymore debates lately with the Swedish prime minister?
Jim F.
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999 08:49:17 +0100 "Bob Malecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>
>On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 20:41:20 -, "Geoff Collier" =
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>Now you have more time can you update us on your local
Our friend Bob is always disparaging Kautsky but couldn't it
be the case that Lenin was right concerning pre-WW I Europe
whereas Kautsky's concept of a super-imperialism may well
have validity for the world we live in now?
Jim F.
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999 16:18:00 + Jim heartfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
In message <001e01bf529a$768c2340$8af3143e@malecki>, Bob Malecki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 20:41:20 -, "Geoff Collier" <
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>Now you have more time can you update us on your local fascist
>problem ?
>>
>>G
In message <002e01bf528b$7687b440$13f2143e@malecki>, Bob Malecki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>However there are times when
>critical support are correct in regards to Stalinist politics. For exanmple the
>last round of elections in England vis a vis the SLP..
Only a fool would get out of bed to
In message , Doug Henwood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Bob Malecki wrote:
>
>>It is a myth "globalization". What we are seeing is growuing
>>inter-imperialist rivalry which is quite the opposite of
>>globalization the Leninist analisis of imperialism being t
>>A vote for the Stalinists in Finland is hardly in support of class
>>struggle historically or today.
>>
>>Warm Regards
>>Bob Malecki
>
>As there isn't any Bolshevik-Leninist to vote so we have to vote for what
>we have.
>Of course we don't support Manner as a Stalinist but because his work for
>