Re: M-TH: Is NZ a bloated semi-colony?

1999-10-07 Thread Bill Cochrane
way more circumspect in pursuing this trajectory?\ cheers Bill -- From: "Dave Bedggood" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: M-TH: Is NZ a bloated semi-colony? Date: Fri, Oct 8, 1999, 5:43 AM Gidday Bill, Yes NZ earned differential rent on its pastoral

Re: M-TH: Is NZ a bloated semi-colony?

1999-10-06 Thread Dave Bedggood
Gidday Bill, Yes NZ earned differential rent on its pastoral production for much of its history I agree. But a lot of this dissappeared into the hands of the financiers, banks etc who had the mortage on the land etc. i.e. much of it back to the motherland. That part which was retained by the

Re: M-TH: Is NZ a bloated semi-colony?

1999-10-05 Thread Dave Bedggood
Gerry, As far as I know the Lenin criteria for imperialism/semi-colony/colony has not changed, much as the post-als would like us to believe the opposite. Surplus value pumped out of NZ by finance capital from the 1840's to the present confirms NZ as NOT imperialist, despite its relatively