Rob Schaap wrote:
C'mon Hugh!
You're reaching here:
The book is boring, superficial and grotesquely pretentious. If it was a
straight-forward petty-bourgeois radical attack on Wall Street it would
hardly pass muster because it's such a drag to read, the forest is lost
from sight as each new
Hugh Rodwell wrote:
Doug does not at all follow Marx every inch of the way, as he holds no
truck with the labour theory of value.
Bullshit. I've never said any such thing. I've said I don't see the use of
efforts like Shaikh Tonak's to translate bourgeois economic statistics
into Marxian
