Doug Henwood wrote:
Hugh Rodwell wrote:
The reason our indirect (not so bloody indirect actually) apologists for
capital (such as Doug and Chris, with Rob flapping around them like one of
Dante's trimmers on the banks of the Styx)
[...]
keep trying to make us think
that capital is doing OK and
test
--- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
Robert Malecki wrote:
I see that Doug is still upset because Workers Vanguard tore his
"WallStreet" apart. And cyberspace reflects the dismal shape of the left in
general. But for you who is soft on the Stalinists to talk about sectarians
and censors must be the understatement of the year.
Fortunately, the links on the LBO links page work just fine. Visit
http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_links.html, scroll about 4/5 of the
way down, or search for "Malecki." Links not only to the WV critique of
Wall Street, but to Malecki central and a direct link to his
hot-as-a-pistol
Deadwood writes!
Fortunately, the links on the LBO links page work just fine. Visit
http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_links.html, scroll about 4/5 of the
way down, or search for "Malecki." Links not only to the WV critique of
Wall Street, but to Malecki central and a direct link to his
Dave Bedggood wrote:
Interesting that Doug Henwood thinks that non-profit ownership is
perceived as a threat by Ford.
Ford FOUNDATION, not the Ford Motor Corp. And point was, if you even
bothered to read the original text, was that the various community
organizations in the U.S. were in many
At 15:36 30/05/99 +0200, Hugh wrote
what was only his second contribution in 4 weeks, despite a post at 4 weeks
ago emphasising that we are in a revolutionary situation.
My own theory of his relative silence is that on the question of Kosovo he
has major differences with Bob Malecki tactically
Doud writes:
Judging by cyberspace, Marxism is indeed in dismal shape. It's mainly a
gang of sectarians and censors. Very sad.
Doug
I see that Doug is still upset because Workers Vanguard tore his
"WallStreet" apart. And cyberspace reflects the dismal shape of the left in
general. But for
Both Hugh and I and Dave know very well where we have each other. Certainly
we never agree to disagree when we have our differences.
However we do agree about your both democratic imperialist and reformist
approach to politics.
Most of what Hugh and Dave writes in polemics against both you
Hello Hugh,
I had a feeling we might be hearing from you ... and you know I'm too busy
to bang on like this, but ...
As for the present stage, "reforms" is just a euphemism for slash and burn
reaction, so why anyone at all apart from the bourgeoisie and their
spittle-licking Third Way
Hugh Rodwell wrote:
The reason our indirect (not so bloody indirect actually) apologists for
capital (such as Doug and Chris, with Rob flapping around them like one of
Dante's trimmers on the banks of the Styx)
Luv ya too, Hugh!
keep trying to make us think
that capital is doing OK and will
11 matches
Mail list logo
