Bob Malecki wrote:
>Yeah Jim and we are back to What Hugh mentioned in his first reply. The
>bourgeoisie and the Times using you because they agree that this is
>what's happening.
Hey Bob, I thought you achieved a brief celebrity in the Swedish media
during the last election campaign as spokesp
Jim replies...
>In message <004f01be96b1$df9def80$7ae5a3c3@malecki>, Bob Malecki
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>>Empirical bullshit Jim.
>
>Yeah, sorry about that, I didn't mean to talk about what is really
>happening, when it is so much more revolutionary to substitute what one
>thinks ought t
In message <004f01be96b1$df9def80$7ae5a3c3@malecki>, Bob Malecki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Empirical bullshit Jim.
Yeah, sorry about that, I didn't mean to talk about what is really
happening, when it is so much more revolutionary to substitute what one
thinks ought to be happening.
--
Jim he
Jim replies.
>
>Silly? How so? I said that the bombings would provide an opportunity for
>the government to cast itself as the protector of the immigrant
>communities and cover up its record of racism. That is exactly what
>happened. And I said that the relative decline of the far right led them
Michael wrote..
> Bob, source please for the DSA quote. I heard Bogdan Denitch
>on NPR and know he can sling polemics as well as anyone but the
>language sounds a bit false still. On the LEFT-L list early in this
>imperialist barbeque there were some spirited to and fro between
>"humanitarian int
