Bob Malecki wrote:
You mean we're in a pre-revolutioanry situation now? So the alleged rise of
Nazis, from London to Littleton, is somehow a response to this? How do you
know?
Doug
What?
Bob
Sure sounded to me like you were arguing that the Nazis were a serious
political threat, and by your
[This post was delayed because it was sent from an address
not subscr*bed to the list. Hans Ehrbar.]
It seems the British police have arrested an individual for the bombings
who they claim was acting alone, the spokesman went out of his way to deny
claims that any organised far right group
Bob Malecki wrote:
I bet! Being that reports here last night were talking about "citizen
militias" to defend themselves. No wonder the cops came up with a "lone"
suspect! Think if Jim had tried to link up this with some militant trade
unions rather then pushing is Repunzell version!
This is
I think Bob is onto something. Over there at LM there is a collective mind
set that people worry too much over things like pollution, the safety of
consumer products, neo-nazi activities, etc. The line is handed down by
Furedi and informed by the "sociology of risk," the latest libertarian
craze
Jim replying to Hugh..
Hugh's revolutionary zeal is such that he thinks that it is a betrayal
of principle to address an audience of 500 000, as opposed to one of 5.
No Jim. This is not the case at all. Communists including Hugh do not oppose using the
bourgeois press. The point is what you
