Dave Bedggood wrote:
Interesting that Doug Henwood thinks that non-profit ownership is
perceived as a threat by Ford.
Ford FOUNDATION, not the Ford Motor Corp. And point was, if you even
bothered to read the original text, was that the various community
organizations in the U.S. were in many
Buford writes:
At 15:36 30/05/99 +0200, Hugh wrote
what was only his second contribution in 4 weeks, despite a post at 4 weeks
ago emphasising that we are in a revolutionary situation.
My political activity is not directly proportional to my activity on
Thaxis. A period with few posts does not
At 15:36 30/05/99 +0200, Hugh wrote
what was only his second contribution in 4 weeks, despite a post at 4 weeks
ago emphasising that we are in a revolutionary situation.
My own theory of his relative silence is that on the question of Kosovo he
has major differences with Bob Malecki tactically
Doud writes:
Judging by cyberspace, Marxism is indeed in dismal shape. It's mainly a
gang of sectarians and censors. Very sad.
Doug
I see that Doug is still upset because Workers Vanguard tore his
"WallStreet" apart. And cyberspace reflects the dismal shape of the left in
general. But for
Both Hugh and I and Dave know very well where we have each other. Certainly
we never agree to disagree when we have our differences.
However we do agree about your both democratic imperialist and reformist
approach to politics.
Most of what Hugh and Dave writes in polemics against both you
