On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 04:28:40 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G'day all,
I'd written,
Or shall we wrap the old list up and slip her quietly into the
dustbin?
Well, I think the eloquent silence with which this was greeted can't
be
ignored. If no-one on the list nominates for the
Jim F writes re doom gloom scenarios for the list just as the world
is regrouping (my brief comments below):
That raises the issue lie this once thriving list has seemed to have
slipped into senescence and may well be ready to die a natural
death. Long time subscribers may recall that this
Revolutionary greetings fellow thaxists,
Before everyone heads off, a belated revolutionary new year good wishes to Rob,
James, Hugh and Charles and anyone else who's still watching. I agree with Hugh
that the virtual demise of this list is a symptom of the healthy revival of class
Please consider the following web sites for your bookmarks/ web links:
NAME: Pathways to Philosophy
URL: http://www.philosophypathways.com
DESCRIPTION: Open learning programs from the Philosophical Society
of England based at Sheffield University, with study guide, essay
archive, philosophy
G'day all,
First of all, I fear I may accidentally just have rejected Dave
Bedggood's very worthwhile post in a frenzy of rejecting commercial
spam. If so, sorry Dave. Feel free to send it again. And a happy new
year to you, too, mate.
Now, to Hugh, who wrote:
This to me indicates the
Oh, I see Dave's post did finally get through.
Anyway, yesterday I asked Jim Farmelant if he'd be interested in giving
moderation a shot, and he has kindly agreed to throw his hat in the
ring. I see today that Karl Carlile is prepared to have a go, too.
I do think Thaxis has a promisingly