Reform and social revolution: the new narrative 
 

Marxism contains a language, a set of words and terms accepted as short  
cuts. Problems arise with words and terms given different meaning. "Reform,"  
"concession," "social revolution," and "reformism" are such words.  When  
these terms are detached from the materiality of the "object" being examined,  
the "shortcut" becomes "the long way around." 
 
The dictionary states that reform is "an improvement or amendment of what  
is wrong." Reform means to restructure. Restructuring changes existing 
relations  between and within classes. These production relations express and 
correspond to  material relations of the economy and ultimately find its center 
of gravity in  the division of labor.  "Reform" is alteration of a material 
relation  within and between classes in connection with means of 
production. 
 
Reform and concession is not the same. Reforms are more durable and cannot  
be taken away based on political will alone. Something must change within 
the  "object," structure of society for "reform of the system" to unravel. 
Reforms do  not change the property relations. Wrestling greater shares of the 
social  product and expanded political liberties from the state or employer 
is the  content of most social struggle. Concession is yielding to a demand 
based on  political will. Concessions do not alter the structural relations 
within and  between classes. Concessions can be taken away based on 
political will. The  Republic Window and Door workers in Chicago (Local 1110) 
won a 
concession  package compelling their employer to give them back pay. The 
settlement totals  $1.75 million. It provides the workers with: 
 
oEight weeks of pay they are owed under the federal WARN Act, oTwo months  
of continued health coverage and, oPay for all accrued and unused vacation. 
 
Reform as "shortcut" means "change in relations between and within classes, 
 without changing the property relations." The impulse for reform of the 
system  arises from the spontaneous quantitative development of the building 
blocks of  economy: means of production. 
 
II. 
 
Society is the totality of the relations between classes and groups in a  
community. The creation and form of wealth depends on the state of 
development  of the productive forces. The means of production develop as 
incremental  
quantitative inputs until a qualitative leap is underway. The unity and 
strife  of primary classes defining (re)production is the flesh and blood 
compelling  society to advance through the progressive accumulation of 
productive 
forces. 
 
As involuntary promoter of industry, the bourgeoisie and privileged ruling  
classes, economic and political layers in society evolve a stake in keeping 
the  system the same because that is how their wealth, power, privilege and 
life  experiences are realized. As the means of production evolve, a 
corresponding  deepening change and contradictions widens with the static 
immobile 
property  relations expressed as corporations, political organizations, 
entrenched self  interest of groups of all kinds and their civic structures. As 
favorable  condition emerges the social struggle riveted to primary classes 
ends with a  quantitative leap in the social relations, which brings a 
reformed society more  into correspondence with improved means of production. 
 
III. 
 
The impulse for reform arises from the spontaneous quantitative development 
 of means of production. The impulse for social revolution arises from the  
spontaneous qualitative development of means of production. The former 
merges  with the latter only under conditions of leap to a new technology 
regime, as was  the case of the industrial revolution. 
 
Our generations have witnessed, lived and recorded the epochal movement of  
a mode of production and how it reformed itself until all the space -  
boundaries, in the industrial system was exhausted. At each juncture -  
(quantitative boundary of our developing industrial production relations), the  
subjective question of political revolution emerged as an issue for the most  
farsighted revolutionaries. 
 
Henry Ford and the system of "Fordism" expressed the continuation of the  
industrial revolution. Henry Ford's factory system accelerated restructuring 
of  production relations and changes the in the form of the working class 
destroying  the structural basis of craft/skilled labor of the historic 
artisan. Assembly  line production restructured the industrial work process 
driving transition from  craft to industrial trade unionism. This motion logic 
was 
genuine reform of the  system. America assembly line auto production nail 
the coffin shut on the  "company town" and laid the basis for suburbia; 
expanded the cement and housing  industry and fifty years later resulted in our 
nationwide Interstate system.  There are thousands of incremental changes to 
society brought about by the Henry  ford system. 
 
The growth of the industrial union movement was a subjective/political  
reform of the system, expressing a material reform of the building blocks of 
the  economy.  Reform is the actual process of a system passing from one  
quantitative boundary of growth to another. Reform of the system gushes forth  
based on continuous quantitative growth of a distinct "quality" defined as  
specific state of development of the means of production. 
 
The National Labor Relations Act, signed by Roosevelt into law July 5, 1935 
 or the Wagner Act, was a genuine reform that changed the relations within 
and  between classes. Seven months after the Wagner Act became law, the 
first sit  down strike took place at Firestone Plant One in Akron Ohio. This 
single legal  document regulated labor unrest to the legal arena. But is 
implication were much  broader and durable than a concession. It was a 
concession 
that reformed the  system. 
 
The most recent memory of the reform movement is that of the African  
American freedom struggles. African Americans have always fought and struggled  
for freedom and equality. This critical subjective factor of fighting gives  
shape to the outcome of reform. 
 
IV.
 
 

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to