[Marxism-Thaxis] WL's glossary--a suggestion

2010-03-24 Thread c b
Why don't we put up the latest version of this at googledocs and collaborate, 'wiki-style', on it? Then it could be published as a blog or wiki. Might prove after all that has been said that this list's regulars can work together on something? Discussing it over an old-fashioned list like this pr

[Marxism-Thaxis] WL's glossary--a suggestion

2010-03-24 Thread CeJ
>>Prior to this latest flurry of posts, I thought CeJ was an intelligent man. I didn't realize how mistaken I was. I can see this Wiki will be like a stable, except that we won't be able to shovel the shit fast enough.<< My Ralph you are mercurial, aren't you? Coming from a guy who posts a blurb a

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] WL's glossary--a suggestion

2010-03-24 Thread Ralph Dumain
Prior to this latest flurry of posts, I thought CeJ was an intelligent man. I didn't realize how mistaken I was. I can see this Wiki will be like a stable, except that we won't be able to shovel the shit fast enough. It's really essential to define the purpose of this project, its audience, an

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] WL's glossary--a suggestion

2010-03-24 Thread Waistline2
In a message dated 3/23/2010 7:36:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, jann...@gmail.com writes: Why don't we put up the latest version of this at googledocs and collaborate, 'wiki-style', on it? Then it could be published as a blog or wiki. Might prove after all that has been said that this lis

[Marxism-Thaxis] WL's glossary--a suggestion

2010-03-23 Thread CeJ
Why don't we put up the latest version of this at googledocs and collaborate, 'wiki-style', on it? Then it could be published as a blog or wiki. Might prove after all that has been said that this list's regulars can work together on something? Discussing it over an old-fashioned list like this pr