CB: As the theory of the national question and the African American people,
I've
heard your discussion of it a number of times, and your criticism of the
CPUSA positions. What you say is ... I don't know what to call it...It's
doesn't seem out and out wrong, but it's not particularly persuasive.
Waistline2
This says Toffler talks about a super-industrial society.
CB
^^
WL: Have you read the books? I have - many times, back when they were first
published. Here is the curve of Tofflers writings, which provide an outline
and
back drop: 1970 - Future Shock - read; 1980 - The Third
BTW, from looking at Frederick Chaote's website
on L.I. Akselrod, I noticed that one of her downloadable
papers, Spinoza and Materialism, appears in
English translation. This paper can be downloaded
from http://www.sovlit.org/lia/Texts/LIA_Spinoza1925.pdf.
Also, in English is her paper, From
Note: forwarded message attached.
-
Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. ___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or
read our press www.geocities.com/Paris/6368
Charles Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The distinguishing feature of
communism is not the abolition of property
generally, but the abolition of bourgeois property. But modern bourgeois
private property is the final and most complete expression of the
Well, I found some cash to answer some of your email posted this week...The
world proletarian revolution opens a new historical epoch since the capitalist
mode of production has been overthrown ed and the communist mode of production
has been imposed by the revolutionary proletariat. So
read our press www.geocities.com/Paris/6368
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:DG: I wish it was like this and we could pass to a
higher civilisation than
capitalism without any reorganisation of production, distribution etc. But
transitions in history do not work like that. I do not deny the fact that
Waistline2 :
Speaking of the spreading revolt.
There is no such thing as a final revolution. All revolutions fail but
never totally. The metabolism of revolutions is that there is a long
incubation period building up pressure which erupts with irrational
force. The irrationality of the
Here is the stirring of the new proletariat following the same social logic
as the 1992 Los Angeles rebellion. Sorry if this does not look like the
workers revolts.
^^
CB: Yea, LA pretty much looks like revolt, not revolution.
What is this a Stalinist theory of permanent revolution?
