Re: M-TH: Re: dialectical materialism/activist materialism
Chris Burford
Sun, 15 Aug 1999 04:27:44 -0700
At 09:09 13/08/99 -0400, Jim Farmelant wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 11:41:21 GMT J.WALKER, ILL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why should we, as socialists or Marxists, adopt such a perspective?
In
Haines Brown
--http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism/2008-March/024942.html--
At the risk of furthering a side thread, allow me to reply to Carrol
briefly.
Carrol writes: may I suggest that dialectics not be
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism/2008-March/024894.html
Haines Brown
Thu Mar 6 14:31:28 MST 2008
Previous message: [Marxism] The Obama Bubble - Black Agenda Report
Next message: [Marxism] China Labor Watch: Dongguan Fuan Textile Mill
Laying off Thousands of Workers
Messages sorted
I thought similarly. What about Bhakar , before he became idealist ? Is that
the way to spell it ? I was on a list. It sounded like sort of dialectical
materialism to me, but the people interested in it didn't cop to that. There
were a whole lot of people interested in it.
CB
Ralph Dumain
Jim Farmelant :
As far as I can tell the term dialectical materialism was first
coined by the German worker Josef Dietzgen, who had independently
arrived at political and philosophical views that were akin
to those of Marx and Engels. Plekhanov is usually credited
Dialectical materialism
Jump to: navigation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_materialism#column-one , search
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_materialism#searchInput
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Mergefrom.gif
It has been suggested that Marxist philosophy of nature
Encyclopedia entries like these can always be improved upon. There is one
paragraph in this one which puzzles me. See below. Examples would have
helped. Of course there have been philosophers interested in dialectical
materialism as an ontology independent of its political marxist
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:42:49 -0500 Ralph Dumain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Encyclopedia entries like these can always be improved upon. There
is one
paragraph in this one which puzzles me. See below. Examples would
have
helped. Of course there have been philosophers interested in
Here is the fun part. Marx is quoted as stating:
Merely quantitative differences, beyond a certain point, pass into
qualitative changes. --Karl Marx, Capital, Vol. 1.
This is translated as number two of the three laws of dialectics.
The three laws of dialectics are:
*The law of the
I wrote, for about the twentieth time over the past four years, in response
to by dear friend and Comrade CB:
It is not accurate to say that quantity or quantitative change turns into
qualitative change and quality turns into quantity because this expresses only
a perceptual understanding of
10 matches
Mail list logo
