Butler
Charles Brown charlesb at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us 
Thu Jun 5 13:48:15 PDT 2008 

Previous message: [lbo-talk] Neocons' last throw? 
Next message: [lbo-talk] Butler 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 
Search LBO-Talk Archives 
 
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author 
Sort by:  Date Rank Author Subject Reverse Sort 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Doug Henwood wrote: 


> > A thirst 
>> thought can only be abated by the _material_ impact of water in the

>> digestive and circulatory systems. Symbols meaning water won't do
the 
>> trick. 
> 
>No kidding. Do you think Judith Butler is a moron or a psychotic? 


^^^ Butler seems to be critically and especially a theoretician for the
lesbian and gay liberation movement; politics and knowledge in the
politics of sexuality. The central use of the claim of no _significant_
determination by heterosexual biological instinct is to establish the
principle of anti-essentialism. This gives theoretical underpinning to
the rhetorical term "heterosexism" or concept of heter-sexists as an
oppressor group. 

" Significant" is a pun here, in the signifying structuralist
tradition. There is no significant determination or biology doesn't
affirmatively determine the cultural rules of American ( European ?
Culture X ?) sexuality or sexual roles. 

The precise general structuralist concept is that biological facts only
make determination of cultural structures or rules or ideas by limiting
them, not by determining them affirmatively ( See _Culture and Practical
Reason_ , by Sahlins, for example 

http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/2094.ctl ) 

I'm arguing that biological heterosexuality does make some affirmative
determination of the symbolic structure of sexuality in American
culture. This would make it an unique exception to the general rule of
only negative or limiting determination of culture by nature. 

As Marx seems to say, sex is a special exception . That would be
because sexuality and sexual instinct is a natural sociality, unlike
appetite for food , for example. Natural appetite relates a human being
and a natural object. Natural sexuality relates two humans, i.e. is a
natural sociality. 

See passage from Marx here 

http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htm 



...In the approach to woman as the spoil and hand-maid of communal lust
is expressed the infinite degradation in which man exists for himself,
for the secret of this approach has its unambiguous, decisive, plain and
undisguised expression in the relation of man to woman and in the manner
in which the direct and natural species-relationship is conceived. The
direct, natural, and necessary relation of person to person is the
relation of man to woman. In this natural species-relationship man’s
relation to nature is immediately his relation to man, just as his
relation to man is immediately his relation to nature - his own natural
destination. In this relationship, therefore, is sensuously manifested,
reduced to an observable fact, the extent to which the human essence has
become nature to man, or to which nature to him has become the human
essence of man. 


>From this relationship one can therefore judge man’s whole level of
development. From the character of this relationship follows how much
man as a species-being, as man, has come to be himself and to comprehend
himself; the relation of man to woman is the most natural relation of
human being to human being. It therefore reveals the extent to which
man’s natural behaviour has become human, or the extent to which the
human essence in him has become a natural essence - the extent to which
his human nature has come to be natural to him. This relationship also
reveals the extent to which man’s need has become a human need; the
extent to which, therefore, the other person as a person has become for
him a need - the extent to which he in his individual existence is at
the same time a social being. 


The first positive annulment of private property - crude communism - is
thus merely a manifestation of the vileness of private property, which
wants to set itself up as the positive community system. 




Charles 




This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc. 
www.surfcontrol.com

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to