[Marxism-Thaxis] Steve Early, My new religion (Boston Globe)

2007-12-21 Thread farmela...@juno.com

My new religion

www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/12/21/my=
_new_religion/

By Steve Early  |  December 21, 2007

WHILE MILLIONS of Americans have managed to minimize the impact of this year's 
presidential election campaign on their collective consciousness,=
 the candidates from both parties have had a transformative effect on me. 
They've made me a militant atheist.

It's not a label that would have fit comfortably in the past. In fact, I've 
long been in the closet with all those other secular humanists who never cared 
enough about organized religion, one way or another, to complain about it in 
public - much less join an atheist group.

But now I stand accused, by a prominent neighbor in Belmont, of wanting to 
establish a new religion in America - the religion of secularism. In a recent 
speech, Mitt Romney declared that I'm wrong - despite my never having gotten 
into an argument with anyone about which religion is right or wrong or whether 
they all should be avoided.

In my previous job as a labor organizer, the subject was taboo, due to its 
potential divisiveness in groups striving for workplace and class solidarity. 
Unless you're guilt tripping a Catholic institution into living up to the 
standards of past papal pronouncements about the dignity of labor, or trying to 
get some local minister or rabbi to bestow their blessing on the 
fast-disappearing practice of collective bargaining, what's God got to do with 
having a union anyway?

Being a socialist as well as a trade unionist seemed like baggage enough for 
me. Why call attention to the fact that you're also part of that tiny fraction 
of the population that doesn't believe in angels and auras, holy ghosts or 
trinities, great spirits, supreme beings, or deities?

Now, my scrupulously maintained detachment from all matters spiritual is under 
siege. The other side - as the brave Moslem apostate Ayann Hirsi Ali points out 
- just won't leave us alone, here or abroad. In the United States, while still 
far from being a theocratic state, the live and let live tolerance of an 
earlier era has given way to in-your-face proselytizing - or, in Romney's case, 
demonizing. On the presidential campaign trail, ritual professions of 
Judeo-Christian faith have become a precondition for admission to the first, 
second, or any tier of candidates. Among the Democrats, you must have a 
favorite Bible passage or parable ready to cite. In the GOP camp, you better 
believe every word in the book as well.

On candidate resumes, church attendance is no longer enough. Now, would-be 
occupants of the White House flaunt their past roles as Christian leaders - 
although ex-minister Mike Huckabee's application of that label to himself, in 
Iowa TV ads, seems designed to call attention to doctrinal differences with 
Romney. This must be hard for our former governor to take. After all, he's an 
ex-bishop in the Mormon stake that erected a huge mausoleum-like temple, with 
a controversial steeple, that towers over everything around it just a few 
blocks from my house (yet he implies that I'm plotting to impose my 
nonreligious views on him?).

Meanwhile, religiosity plays a big role in Hillary Clinton's latest makeover, 
just as United Church of Christ membership is Barack Obama's first line of 
defense against rumors that he may be a follower of the Prophet Mohammed! And 
so it goes, with nary a sane word from anyone running about why, as John F. 
Kennedy argued, separation of church and state should render all of this 
discourse irrelevant for the duration.

It's enough to make even a nonbeliever pray for a moment of respite, a day of 
deliverance, or, better yet, a year of abstinence from any further public 
declarations by the candidates on the unfathomable mysteries of their faith.

Steve Early is a freelance journalist. 

Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company
_


_
Click here to pick up the school supplies you need!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/Ioyw6i3nmNloxaxpraH60XtdKLdxpMH4lh1tz53zgrKY1SVYWbU4r1/



___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Steve Early, My new religion (Boston Globe)

2007-12-21 Thread CeJ
Of course if you have doubts about the existence of God, you do have
to wonder how God could speak to politicians like Romney and Huckabee.

The problem with asserting something like this in some imagined
tradition of American secularism is it ignores the real American
religion driving American politics, which is the religion of
America--as God's chosen nation (even if you don't believe in God), as
a nation with some exceptional Godly historical role to play in the
'rational progress' of the world. That is the assumption all of the
candidates share. You can't get elected on a critique of American
nihilistic nationalism, which is the national religion.

CJ

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis