[Marxism-Thaxis] We must dream!

2010-11-08 Thread c b
Lars T. Lih: ?We must dream!? Echoes of `What Is to
   Be Done?? in Lenin?s later career | Links International Journal of
   Socialist Renewal


By *Lars T. Lih*

I appreciate the opportunity to look again at Lenin?s /What Is to Be
Done?/?especially since I have just completed a biographical study of
Lenin?s career as a whole (/Lenin/, forthcoming in the Critical Lives
series by Reaktion Books). One of the things I found?to tell the truth,
somewhat unexpectedly?was a series of echoes of /What Is to Be Done?/
throughout Lenin?s entire career. So I thought it would be useful to
talk about some of the basic themes of Lenin?s book and tie each of
these themes to later echoes.

Full article at http://links.org.au/node/1980

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] We must dream!

2010-11-08 Thread Jim Farmelant
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/nov/06/harmony-prince-charles-review


Harmony: A New Way of Looking at Our World by HRH The Prince of Wales –
review
Prince Charles is calling for a revolution – but is he radical enough,
asks Terry Eagleton

 Terry Eagleton The Guardian, Saturday 6 November 2010  

Never afraid to stick his ears above the parapet, Prince Charles has
produced a book he proudly describes as a call to revolution. Throwing
moderation to the winds, he comes out in favour of happiness, sustainable
development and cities fit to live in, while opposing greed, ugliness and
environmental catastrophe. Has his old man got wind of this subversive
stuff? Has the prince taken to selling Socialist Worker to the toilers of
Clarence House?

Harmony is a hard book to summarise, since apart from Jedward and Marxist
literary theory there is very little in what Charles describes as being
aware and alive in this extraordinary universe that it leaves out. The
unifying thread, however, is the need to abandon a soulless modernity for
a traditional spirituality.

The book ranges from the mating habits of the albatross to the Sufi
brotherhood, from carpet-weaving in Afghanistan to the mysterious
five-pointed star you get when you superimpose the Earth's orbit on
Mercury's. There is a quotation from the Emerald Tablet of Hermes (that
which is above is as that which is below, and that which is below is as
that which is above), which might just be a coded offer to swap
Highgrove with a council house tenant. We move from reflections on the
grammar and geometry of nature to the magical mountain kingdom of
Bhutan, where, as the book fails to point out, democracy is only
recently known. There is some grudging admiration for the Large Hadron
Collider (will it enable us to re-find our place in nature? ), along
with some unqualified approval of termites, Thomas Aquinas and the garden
the prince has created at Highgrove planted with fig, pomegranate and
olive trees because they are mentioned in the Qur'an. This, one takes
it, is his contribution to the war on terror.

There are, to be sure, limits to Charles's revolutionism. He wants the
kind of change radical enough to do away with polluters and modernist
architects, but not radical enough to do away with himself. Meanwhile, he
is eager to share his thoughts with us on Francis Bacon's Novum Organum,
Ficino's tome on Platonic theology, Marinetti's Futurist manifesto and a
number of other texts he has almost certainly not read. He also offers us
some incisive insights into figures such as Justus von Liebig, David Bohm
and Karlheinz Stockhausen, whom he has very probably not heard of.

This is because, being a royal, he can employ people to do his reading
for him. Two such loyal readers-cum-scribes, Tony Juniper and Ian Skelly,
presumably wrote the hard bits of this book, such as how many power
stations there are in the world, while the prince mixed in a number of
high-minded platitudes reminiscent of a Get Well Soon card.

Like many a coffee-table creation, one of the volume's most alluring
aspects is its smell. But there are also some rather fetching pictures of
the Egyptian goddess Ma'at, the prince sitting on his sofa gazing
benignly at a frog and various astrological diagrams of the cosmos. In
somewhat more dubious taste is a photograph of the twin towers of
Chartres cathedral, which are said to resemble Christ's two fingers held
aloft.

Discovering the same organic patterns everywhere you look is a familiar
symptom of paranoia. In the prince's case, however, it represents an
insight into the fundamental rhythms of the universe. If you press your
face on a large piece of paper on a wall, he tells us, and let your arms
describe natural arcs with a couple of pencils, you would find yourself
creating certain cosmically symbolic circles. He forgets to add that you
would also look a complete prat. Charles, to be sure, has the leisure for
such communings, as others may not.

The point of having an enormous amount of money is not to have to think
about the stuff and thus to be free to turn one's thoughts to more
spiritual matters, like the mystical proportions of the Golden Ratio and
why everyone in the depths of a recession keeps banging on unpoetically
about growth and unemployment. The prince is darkly suspicious of
economic growth – which is to say of other people's hunger for
possessions rather than his own.

Old-style Tories like the prince support a system that breeds materialism
and cultural cretinism, then throw up their hands in well-bred horror at
what they have helped to bring into existence. Despite almost certainly
never having heard of him – a deficiency that doesn't hold him back here
– His Royal Highness should recall Bertolt Brecht's parable about the
troubled king of the east who summoned his wise men and commanded them to
inquire into the source of all the miseries in the world. The wise men
duly investigated, and returned to the king with the answer 

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] We must dream!

2010-11-08 Thread c b
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Ralph Dumain
rdum...@autodidactproject.org wrote:
 I'm guessing CLR James would have enjoyed this article. I don't have a
 detailed enough knowledge of the progress of the revolutionary movement
 from 1902 to 1917, but I find Lih's scenario convincing enough.

 Once the Bolsheviks took power, though, they discovered how intransigent
 social reality was in comparison to their will to radically transform
 it. It is possible that Lenin's dream of 1902 exceeded reality, though
 he obviously gauged the potential of the discontent of the masses with
 the repressive tsarist regime and social order.

 The other question in all this is, except for enhancing historical
 consciousness, what relevance any interpretation of Lenin has for today,
 and esp. in a radically different type of society such as the USA. I



CB: Yep
^^^


 used to say something comparable to we must dream, but now I see only
 a pipe dream.

 On 11/8/2010 10:22 AM, c b wrote:
 Lars T. Lih: ?We must dream!? Echoes of `What Is to
         Be Done?? in Lenin?s later career | Links International Journal of
         Socialist Renewal


 By *Lars T. Lih*

 I appreciate the opportunity to look again at Lenin?s /What Is to Be
 Done?/?especially since I have just completed a biographical study of
 Lenin?s career as a whole (/Lenin/, forthcoming in the Critical Lives
 series by Reaktion Books). One of the things I found?to tell the truth,
 somewhat unexpectedly?was a series of echoes of /What Is to Be Done?/
 throughout Lenin?s entire career. So I thought it would be useful to
 talk about some of the basic themes of Lenin?s book and tie each of
 these themes to later echoes.

 Full article at http://links.org.au/node/1980

 ___
 Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
 Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
 To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
 http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] We must dream!

2010-11-08 Thread Waistline2
In a message dated 11/8/2010 1:01:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
_rdum...@autodidactproject.org_ (mailto:rdum...@autodidactproject.org)   writes:
 
The other question in all this is, except for enhancing historical  
consciousness, what relevance any interpretation of Lenin has for today, and  
esp. 
in a radically different type of society such as the USA. I used to say  
something comparable to we must dream, but now I see only a pipe dream.
 
Comment
 
I second CB yep and the irony of JF forwarded article on the  Prince. 
 
Funny, I always read Lenin's What Is To Be Done as part of an  evolving 
scenario aimed at combining a political group and explaining how to  stay 
organized and take power under appropriate conditions. And why one cannot  
allow a political group, under conditions of active revolution to  reduce its 
activity to a support committee of popular demands. 
 
Seems to me that's just what happened. 
 
I did read the article. 
 
WL. 
 
 

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis