http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1861/letters/61_01_16.htm
>>Darwin's work is most important and suits my purpose in that it
provides a basis in natural science for the historical class struggle.
One does, of course, have to put up with the clumsy English style of
argument. Despite all s
JF:
>>I believe that in the passage quoted from Marx's letter of Lassalle,
Marx wrote "not only is he the first to strike a fatal blow to
'teleology'in natural science," NOT 'theology'. In other words Marx was
noting that Darwin had shown it possible to provide causal explanations
for the apparent
I believe that in the passage quoted from Marx's letter of Lassalle,
Marx wrote "not only is he the first to strike a fatal blow to
'teleology'in natural science," NOT 'theology'. In other words Marx was
noting that Darwin had shown it possible to provide causal explanations
for the apparently des
CeJ jannuzi
I didn't use the main thread title on West and Marxism.
--
"In a speech over Marx's grave, Engels (1883) pointed out the
relations between Marx and Darwin in the following terms: 'Just as
Darwin discovered the law of development of organic nat
I didn't use the main thread title on West and Marxism.
--
"In a speech over Marx's grave, Engels (1883) pointed out the
relations between Marx and Darwin in the following terms: 'Just as
Darwin discovered the law of development of organic nature, so Marx
disco
