CB: Again to keep using this phrase becomes willful slander and
misrepresention. Too many is always a relative term. Too many relative
to what ? We may reach a point that there are too many people to keep warm,
make food for relative to the amount of fuel by way of a fossil fuel based
Yea, I don't know why I keep sending these to the wrong lists.
CB
Waistline2
Comment
1. The concept of the carrying capacity of the earth as an aspect of what
is called sustainability, is in my opinion fundamentally Malthusianism,
even in the hands of Mark Jones. Generally, the following
Restraining the growth of consumption does not
mean going back to living in caves and cooking over
buffalo-chip fires. For decades in the rich nations
increased consumption has not been correlated with
increased satisfaction, and perpetuating Third World
poverty is a luxury that the
Sartesian's refusal to acknowledge that Mark's approach assumes the
absolute necessity of socialist revolution as a premise to avoid ecological
disaster makes his argumentation irrationally contentious in the form of
arguing
with a straw man. It is dishonest. Then to go into all that
