[Marxism] Cuba Re: Goodbye to Leninism

2014-11-16 Thread Dayne Goodwin via Marxism
  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Charlie via Marxism
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu wrote:
. . .
 Cuba survived independent of imperialism and took the socialist road because
 the Castro group and the Communists merged fairly soon after liberation.
. . .
You could argue that the July 26th movement's 'merger' with the
USSR-connected Popular Socialist Party two-and-a-half years after the
revolution was responsible for revolutionary Cuba's survival in the
sense that this diplomatic bow to the Soviet Union was helpful in
assuring continuing international aid and support from the Soviet
bloc.  But the July 26th movement leadership made sure to keep the PSP
in a subordinate domestic political role through many years of rough
relationships in a process of integration (as manifest in the
Escalante case to which Louis refers) that eventuated in officially
founding the Communist Party of Cuba in October 1965.  I think that it
wasn't until the first congress of the Communist Party of Cuba
met in 1975 that the former-PSP had been finally integrated.
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Cuba Re: Goodbye to Leninism

2014-11-16 Thread Thomas via Marxism
  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*


When was it that the means of production were seized by the Cuban working class 
and a government of their workers' councils elected from below adminiser the 
state, you know, like in Russia 1917?  Or is that form of working class rule 
now some silly old relic no longer applicable. 

T


On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Charlie via Marxism
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu wrote:
. . .
 Cuba survived independent of imperialism and took the socialist road because
 the Castro group and the Communists merged fairly soon after liberation.
. . .

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/thomasfbarton%40earthlink.net

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Cuba Re: Goodbye to Leninism

2014-11-16 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES  NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly  permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On 11/16/14 4:34 PM, Thomas via Marxism wrote:


When was it that the means of production were seized by the Cuban
working class and a government of their workers' councils elected
from below adminiser the state, you know, like in Russia 1917?  Or is
that form of working class rule now some silly old relic no longer
applicable.


http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/state_and_revolution/cuba.htm

As the revolution deepened and took on more and more of a proletarian 
character, profound political changes began to take place within Cuba. 
These changes also acted upon the tempo of the revolution, adding fuel 
to the locomotive that was pushing it in a more and more radical 
direction. Once Castro had decided to align himself with the workers, he 
never turned back. He was never one to waver.


In Edward Boorstein's The Economic Transformation of Cuba, we discover 
the ways in which ordinary workers, including blacks--the most 
oppressed--asserted themelves:


By October 1960 most of this administrative and technical personnel had 
left Cuba. The Americans and some of the Cubans were withdrawn by the 
home companies of the plants for which they worked, or left of their own 
accord: they found themselves unable to understand the struggle with the 
United States, unwilling to accept the new way of life that was opening 
up before them.


The Revolutionary Government had to keep the factories and mines going 
only with a minute proportion of the usual trained and experienced 
personnel. A few examples can perhaps best give an idea of what happened.


Five of us from the Ministry of Foreign Commerce, on a business visit, 
were being taken through the Moa nickel plant. In the electric power 
station--itself a large plant--which served the rest of the complex, our 
guide was an enthusiastic youngster of about 22. He did an excellent job 
as guide, but his modesty as well as his age deceived us and only toward 
the end of our tour did we realize that he was not some sort of 
apprentice engineer or assistant--he was in charge of the plant. I 
noticed that he spoke English well and asked him if he had lived in the 
States. Sure, he answered, I studied engineering at Tulane. As soon 
as he finished, he had come back to work for the Revolution and had been 
placed in charge of the power plant.


In another part of the complex, the head of one of the key departments 
was a black Cuban who had about four years of elementary school 
education. He had been an observant worker and when engineer of his 
department left he knew what to do--although he didn't really know why, 
or how his department related to the others in the plant. Now to learn 
why, he was plugging away at his minimo tecnico manual--one of the 
little mimeographed booklets which had been distributed throughout 
industry to improve people's knowledge of their jobs.


And so on throughout the Moa plant. The engineer in charge of the whole 
enterprise, who had a long cigar in his hand and his feet on the desk as 
he gave us his criticisms of the way our Ministry was handling his 
import requirements, was about 28 years old. His chief assistants were 
about the same age and some of them were obviously not engineers.


Yet Moa was made to function. Even laymen are struck with its delicate 
beauty--a testament to American engineering skill. 'Es una joya'--it's a 
jewel, say the Cubans. It is much more impressive than the larger but 
older nickel plant at Nicaro. Shortly after the nickel ore is clawed out 
of the earth by giant Bucyrus power shovels, it a pulverized and mixed 
with water to form a mixture 55 percent and 45 percent water. From then 
on all materials movement is liquids, in pipes, automatically 
controlled. The liquids move through the several miles of the complex, 
in and out of the separate plants, with the reducers, mixing vats, etc. 
Everything depends on innumerable delicate instruments, and on unusual 
materials, resistant to exceptions high temperatures and various kinds 
of chemical reaction. The margin for improvising in repairing or 
replacing parts is small-much smaller than in the mechanized rather than 
the automated Nicaro plant. Yet the Moa plant was in operation when we 
were there: two of the main production lines were going-and all four 
would have been going jf it had not been necessary to cannibalize two 
lines to get replacement parts for the other two.


Except that Moa was an especially complex and difficult operation, jt 
was typical of what happened throughout the mines and factories, and far 
that matter in the railroads, banks, department stores, and movie houses 
that had been taken over. The large oil