Re: [Marxism] On American Hegemony, Part I - Lawyers, Guns

2018-08-08 Thread Michael Meeropol via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

a lot of "inside baseball"  not sure reading parts II and III were
worth it 

(My $.02)

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:41 AM, Louis Proyect via Marxism <
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:

>   POSTING RULES & NOTES  
> #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
> #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
> *
>
> Trump is not proposing an end to American hegemony. Rather, he seeks a
> change in how the US exercises leadership and a consequent shift in
> international and regional orders. If your primary beef with American
> hegemony has been its hypocrisy—its failure to live up to its rhetoric
> about liberal order—then Trump wants to solve your problem: by making the
> order less liberal.
>
> America’s strategic position—its hegemonic leadership—is not a story about
> a colossus striding the world on its own two feet. It’s a function of the
> strength of its strategic partnerships and core allies. The post-1992
> order—for good or for ill—was very much a collective achievement. On its
> own, the United States is much less impressive than discussions of
> “unipolarity,” or the fantasies of certain flavors of nationalists, would
> have you believe.
>
> The immediate consequence of the rise of China and of Russian
> assertiveness lies in the breaking of the ‘greater west’s’ dominance over
> international-order making. For good or for ill, countries now have more
> options about where to go for development aid, security assistance, and
> geopolitical support.
>
> Because the concentration of raw power among the ‘core allies’ remains
> very impressive, their major problem lies in maintaining cohesion. But here
> they are doing very poorly, and right-wing populism (with the encouragement
> of Russia) is the major immediate threat. The longer-term challenge is
> renegotiating the bargain to reflect contemporary challenges.
>
> http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/07/american-hegemony-part
>
> part 2: http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/07/american-
> hegemony-part-ii-liberal-order-concept-good
>
> part 3: http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/08/american-
> hegemony-part-iii-time-non-game-theory
> _
> Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
> Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/opt
> ions/marxism/mameerop%40gmail.com
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] On American Hegemony, Part I - Lawyers, Guns

2018-08-08 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Trump is not proposing an end to American hegemony. Rather, he seeks a 
change in how the US exercises leadership and a consequent shift in 
international and regional orders. If your primary beef with American 
hegemony has been its hypocrisy—its failure to live up to its rhetoric 
about liberal order—then Trump wants to solve your problem: by making 
the order less liberal.


America’s strategic position—its hegemonic leadership—is not a story 
about a colossus striding the world on its own two feet. It’s a function 
of the strength of its strategic partnerships and core allies. The 
post-1992 order—for good or for ill—was very much a collective 
achievement. On its own, the United States is much less impressive than 
discussions of “unipolarity,” or the fantasies of certain flavors of 
nationalists, would have you believe.


The immediate consequence of the rise of China and of Russian 
assertiveness lies in the breaking of the ‘greater west’s’ dominance 
over international-order making. For good or for ill, countries now have 
more options about where to go for development aid, security assistance, 
and geopolitical support.


Because the concentration of raw power among the ‘core allies’ remains 
very impressive, their major problem lies in maintaining cohesion. But 
here they are doing very poorly, and right-wing populism (with the 
encouragement of Russia) is the major immediate threat. The longer-term 
challenge is renegotiating the bargain to reflect contemporary challenges.


http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/07/american-hegemony-part

part 2: 
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/07/american-hegemony-part-ii-liberal-order-concept-good


part 3: 
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/08/american-hegemony-part-iii-time-non-game-theory

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com