Re: [Matlab-emacs-discuss] the filling patch and its problems

2023-07-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "EL" == Eric Ludlam writes: Hi Eri I am not sure who is the culprit here. But this is what I see in emacs/gnus. > --_004_mn2pr05mb65581320f9aede6160120580af02amn2pr05mb6558namp_ > Content-type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="_000_mn2pr05mb65581320f9aede6160120580af02amn2pr05mb6558namp

Re: [Matlab-emacs-discuss] the filling patch and its problems

2023-07-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "EL" == Eric Ludlam writes: > Hi Uwe, > Here’s a revised patch that does a better job filling comments, and > also fixes the indent region issue you found. It seemed that I was able to repair your message (it seems that MATHWORKS changed something with its servers basically all message from

Re: [Matlab-emacs-discuss] the filling patch and its problems

2023-07-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "EL" == Eric Ludlam writes: > The patch was based on the same rev that the previous patch was based > on. Ie – it includes the previous patch, or changes to it. If that > doesn’t fit, I can make and push a branch against main instead. That > might be easier to work with if you have more feedb

Re: [Matlab-emacs-discuss] [a mess of GPL versions]

2023-07-25 Thread Uwe Brauer
>>> "EL" == Eric Ludlam writes: > Yes, I have the updated filling bug info. Thanks. > I have also noticed some filling bugs after my previous patch I would like > to fix. Hoping to get to it soon. I thanks I saw your push, I just pulled and will run my tests later. BTW The Debian person, aske