Tim Leslie wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tim,
>>
>> Based on a *very superficial* quick look, I have two comments:
>>
>> 1) Since the plan is (or was?) to have one more release before
>> specializing to numpy-only support, the ".T" won't work at present.
>>
>> 2) In
On 5/10/07, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim,
>
> Based on a *very superficial* quick look, I have two comments:
>
> 1) Since the plan is (or was?) to have one more release before
> specializing to numpy-only support, the ".T" won't work at present.
>
> 2) In the following (possibly man
Tim,
Based on a *very superficial* quick look, I have two comments:
1) Since the plan is (or was?) to have one more release before
specializing to numpy-only support, the ".T" won't work at present.
2) In the following (possibly mangled by mailer),
> +if Nsizes == 1:
> +x
Hi All,
I've attached a patch which optimizes a particular case of the
RegularPolyCollection.get_transformed_patches method. This is
particularly useful when using a picker on a scatter plot with ~40,000
points (as I happen to be doing) and cuts the time spent in this
function from ~4s to ~1s, wh
