On Nov 8, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
> So, we need to look at the pros/cons of continuing to support these
> legacy APIs going forward.
I've got some more benchmarks for the WX and WXAgg backends in
trunk. It looks like using ssh with compression or the NX remote
desktop b
Christopher Barker wrote:
> Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> Wx supports polycurves in its new wxGraphicsContext API (but not the
>> wxDC API that mpl uses now). This means a fairly complete rewrite of
>> the wx backend,
>
> not necessarily. You can create a GraphicsContext from a wx.DC, you may
>
On Nov 8, 2007 7:10 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fernando, do you have a record of the changes you guys made at SciPy-2007?
No, we just went through the codebase by hand and quickly removed
anything that looked like it would do namespace packages. Once that
was out of the way, th
On Nov 8, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
> I wonder if there is another way to speed that up with Agg -- can you
> compress the bitmap data to pass it to the Xserver? is that happening
> already?
I'm not aware of any obvious method for enabling compression in
remote X11 connectio
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>> So, we need to look at the pros/cons of continuing to support these
>>> legacy APIs going forward.
>> IMHO a gtk and a wx back end are very important for embedding MPL in
>>
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Wx supports polycurves in its new wxGraphicsContext API (but not the
> wxDC API that mpl uses now). This means a fairly complete rewrite of
> the wx backend,
not necessarily. You can create a GraphicsContext from a wx.DC, you may
be able to just add that step for dr
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> So, we need to look at the pros/cons of continuing to support these
>> legacy APIs going forward.
>
> IMHO a gtk and a wx back end are very important for embedding MPL in
> applications. I am sure you ha
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> So, we need to look at the pros/cons of continuing to support these
> legacy APIs going forward.
IMHO a gtk and a wx back end are very important for embedding MPL in
applications. I am sure you have a replacement proposition, bu
The following drawing backends are functional on the transforms branch:
Agg
Ps
Pdf *
Svg
Cairo *
* These could still use some optimizations to draw_markers and/or
draw_path_collection.
Now onto the "problem" ones. I had asked on the mailing list a while
On Thursday 08 November 2007 03:16:14 am Eric Firing wrote:
> Darren Dale wrote:
> > Building does not seem to be a problem, just do the usual python setup.py
> > build, etc. I ran backend_driver on my not-so-speedy home computer:
>
> Darren,
>
> Well done! I blew away other versions of traits, up
Darren Dale wrote:
> Building does not seem to be a problem, just do the usual python setup.py
> build, etc. I ran backend_driver on my not-so-speedy home computer:
Darren,
Well done! I blew away other versions of traits, updated mpl, built and
installed, and traits appeared. No pain.
The n
11 matches
Mail list logo
