Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Fwd: Re: release plans]

Russell E Owen wrote: > P.S. Chris: I've been meaning to ask you. Regarding my instructions for > building matplotlib: > > is it still necessary to fuss with WX_CONFIG environment variable or is > that no longer needed for mod

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release plans

Before I push the OSX binary to SF I have 2 questions. 1. I used to be able to rename the file from "i386" to "fat" and have it install on a ppc or intel machine. This doesn't seem to work anymore even though this is a fat build. Any clues on how to approach this? 2. Can anyone test this on 10

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release plans

Charlie Moad wrote: > - 0.91 > - numpy only > - no wx compiled in (since 2.8 is pure python) > - should tk use the default OSX installation for leopard? > 10.5 comes with a working freetype, but I was still going to > statically link it in for 10.4 users. It will be a FAT build. sounds good to m

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release plans

On Nov 27, 2007 5:00 PM, Charlie Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The last few builds for OSX I have done, somone (don't remember who) > complained that I didn't build against ActiveTCL. I didn't know if > others had a preference on this. I think native tcl/tk is preferable, but this is not a te

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release plans

The last few builds for OSX I have done, somone (don't remember who) complained that I didn't build against ActiveTCL. I didn't know if others had a preference on this. - Charlie On Nov 27, 2007 5:05 PM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 27, 2007 2:05 PM, Charlie Moad <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release plans

On Nov 27, 2007 2:05 PM, Charlie Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To clarify > > - 0.91 > - numpy only > - no wx compiled in (since 2.8 is pure python) > - should tk use the default OSX installation for leopard? Yes on the first three -- I am not sure what the last question is referring to so

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release plans

To clarify - 0.91 - numpy only - no wx compiled in (since 2.8 is pure python) - should tk use the default OSX installation for leopard? 10.5 comes with a working freetype, but I was still going to statically link it in for 10.4 users. It will be a FAT build. - Charlie On Nov 27, 2007 1:45

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release plans

On Nov 26, 2007 5:42 PM, Charles Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ready whenever. I did a test 10.5 bulid a few days ago > targeting 10.4 with the latest libpng and freetype statically linked > in. All went pretty well. I'll write up build instructions similar > to yours when I go through

Re: [matplotlib-devel] release plans

Charles Moad wrote: > Ready whenever. I did a test 10.5 bulid a few days ago > targeting 10.4 with the latest libpng and freetype statically linked > in. Great! A note about that -- I just built an app with Py2exe and delivered to someone that then couldn't run it, 'cause it's linked