Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I don't understand why anyone would want the one on the left,
> but if you can provide a use case for it, it should be implementable.
I know I can't. I think john may be right that it's just not that hard
to do by hand.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanog
2008/6/24 John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Committed to svn r5654 -- here is the test script::
>
> import numpy as np
> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
> plt.plot(np.random.rand(10), 'x-', label='first line')
> plt.plot(np.random.rand(10), 'o-.', label='second line')
> plt.legend(numpoints=1
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:03:33 -0500
"John Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Nils Wagner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Actually, I would like to display an image (png format)
>> 'under' several lines.
>> Assuming that a watermark function will be supported b
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Nils Wagner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I would like to display an image (png format)
> 'under' several lines.
> Assuming that a watermark function will be supported by
> mpl, it would be nice to have an example in
>
> matplotlib/examples/pylab_examples
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:10:08 -0400
Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a couple of different ways this could be done.
>
> Alpha-blending over top of the image (should work for
>everything but Postscript):
>
> gcf().text(0.1, 0.1, "Watermark", rotation=45,
>fontproperties
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a couple of different ways this could be done.
>
> Alpha-blending over top of the image (should work for everything but
> Postscript):
>
> gcf().text(0.1, 0.1, "Watermark", rotation=45,
> fontproperties=FontP
There are a couple of different ways this could be done.
Alpha-blending over top of the image (should work for everything but
Postscript):
gcf().text(0.1, 0.1, "Watermark", rotation=45,
fontproperties=FontProperties(size=64), alpha=0.2)
Or under the axes as described here:
http://www.mail-ar
Hi All,
This is to let you know that I have filed a feature
request for a watermark function in mpl.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=560721&aid=2001940&group_id=80706
Nils
-
Check out the new So
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:59 AM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My fault -- I was working on adding an idle event handler across
> backends and implemented something using threads for tkagg and haven't
> solved the problem of cross thread signal handling.
That's a nasty problem. See
ht
"Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 13:48, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:43, Charles Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The releases and builds are up. Please test them out, and I'll leave the
> >> announcements to you, Joh
John wrote:
"I believe the unspoken consensus was it is easy to set the alpha on
the figurePatch and axesPatch so a global alpha was unneccessary."
It still might be convenient to make this an option on savefig. Sure it's only
a few lines of code, but not necessarily obvious lines of code.
Wa
Nils,
I saw your bump about this transparency issue. Before moving forward on
this, I'd like to know what your use case is. I've attached a mock-up
example. On the left is the effect of changing the alpha value of
everything to 50% (what you and Christopher had suggested). But it
seems to
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Nils Wagner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for your prompt reply and sorry for my rudimental bug report.
>
> BTW, is the transparency option for png files in progress ?
I believe the unspoken consensus was it is easy to set the alpha on
the figurePatch and
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:59:30 -0500
"John Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Darren Dale
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 June 2008 09:22:34 am Nils Wagner wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Since *yesterday* I have some trouble with pylab.
>>> Some program
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 June 2008 09:22:34 am Nils Wagner wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since *yesterday* I have some trouble with pylab.
>> Some program hang. I cannot use Ctrl C to kill them.
>> Ctrl Z works. If I use ps I get
>>
>> 1091
On Tuesday 24 June 2008 09:22:34 am Nils Wagner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since *yesterday* I have some trouble with pylab.
> Some program hang. I cannot use Ctrl C to kill them.
> Ctrl Z works. If I use ps I get
>
> 1091 pts/500:00:02 python
> 1119 pts/500:00:00 gs
>
> gs is somehow connec
Hi all,
Since *yesterday* I have some trouble with pylab.
Some program hang. I cannot use Ctrl C to kill them.
Ctrl Z works. If I use ps I get
1091 pts/500:00:02 python
1119 pts/500:00:00 gs
gs is somehow connected to my problem.
I can kill the job by kill -9 1091. Then the gs pro
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry to bump the thread, but has anyone had a chance to take a look?
>
> I've re-attached the patch.
Thanks for the reminder and sorry for the delay getting back. The
problem in the patch was that the "
18 matches
Mail list logo