John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The only issue I've seen is that scaling with PS is way too big. I've
>> attached ps and pdf files from the same run to show the problem.
>
> The only thing I can think of is since you are using a ide
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only issue I've seen is that scaling with PS is way too big. I've
> attached ps and pdf files from the same run to show the problem.
The only thing I can think of is since you are using a identity
transform and drawing i
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that offset_copy() went away in the transforms rewrite and was
> replaced with a trans + transfroms.Affine2D().translate(x,y). This
> works fine for x,y in pixels. However, offset_copy would also let you
> specify x
Hi,
I noticed that offset_copy() went away in the transforms rewrite and was
replaced with a trans + transfroms.Affine2D().translate(x,y). This
works fine for x,y in pixels. However, offset_copy would also let you
specify x,y in points. How can I get that to work with the new
transforms? Mo
David M. Kaplan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry about the problems. The labeling code is somewhat difficult to
> understand and I was using label indices when I should have used level
> indices (or vice-versa). I have a fix, but want to test it more before
> committing. Let me know when is a good time t
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 03:42:27PM -0500, John Hunter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Gael Varoquaux
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It turns out it was only in the GTK backend, and quite trivial to
> > correct. Attached is a new patch, including this correction.
> Hey Gael, this is st
Hi John & All
> The only short term pressure for a point release is coming from
> debian, because they are having some trouble with our last point
> release. Because debian is an important platform, I want to get a
> point release out that satisfies their problems ASAP, but not before
> we are re
Hi,
Sorry about the problems. The labeling code is somewhat difficult to
understand and I was using label indices when I should have used level
indices (or vice-versa). I have a fix, but want to test it more before
committing. Let me know when is a good time to do it so that I don't
mess up a r
