Re: [matplotlib-devel] scatter and alpha settings

2008-10-09 Thread Eric Firing
Gregor Thalhammer wrote: > Dear developers, > > in matplotlib 0.98.3 I discoverd that in scatter individual alpha > settings (by giving a list of rgba values) are ignered. Here an example > that show this behaviour: All points show the same alpha value as given > by the alpha keyword argument.

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Patch for scatter plot legend enhancement

2008-10-09 Thread Jae-Joon Lee
Okay. I may work on it sometime tomorrow or during the weekends. Regards, -JJ On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:54 PM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ah, that makes more sense Jae-Joon - thanks! > > Jae-Joon -- could

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Patch for scatter plot legend enhancement

2008-10-09 Thread John Hunter
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, that makes more sense Jae-Joon - thanks! Jae-Joon -- could you handle this patch submission? Thanks, JDH - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the

Re: [matplotlib-devel] path simplification with nan (or move_to)

2008-10-09 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If 2) in the choices above is the case you are concerned about, and >> you want this warning feature in this case, we can add an rc param >> which is autoset at build time, something like "show.warn = >> True|False"

Re: [matplotlib-devel] path simplification with nan (or move_to)

2008-10-09 Thread Michael Droettboom
Michael Droettboom wrote: > John Hunter wrote: > >> In unrelated news, I am not in favor of the recent change to warn on >> non-GUI backends when "show" is called. I realize this may sometimes >> cause head-scratching behavior for some users who call show and no >> figure pops up, but I think t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] path simplification with nan (or move_to)

2008-10-09 Thread Michael Droettboom
John Hunter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thanks for doing this--it has already helped me in my testing of the >> gappy-path simplification support, which I have now committed. As you >> suggested earlier, I included in path.py a check for