Re: [matplotlib-devel] [SciPy-dev] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and packaging situation

2009-12-28 Thread David Cournapeau
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:29:24PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> Perhaps this could be useful: >> http://checkinstall.izto.org/ > > Yes, checkinstall is really cool. However, I tend to prefer things with > no magic that I don't have to sandbo

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [SciPy-dev] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and packaging situation

2009-12-28 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:29:24PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > Perhaps this could be useful: > http://checkinstall.izto.org/ Yes, checkinstall is really cool. However, I tend to prefer things with no magic that I don't have to sandbox to know what they are doing. This is why I am also happy to hea

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [SciPy-dev] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and packaging situation

2009-12-28 Thread Neal Becker
David Cournapeau wrote: > The idea would be that for a few major distributions at least, you > would have .rpm available on the repository. If you install from > sources, there would be a few mechanisms to avoid your exact issue > (like maybe defaulting to --user kind of installs). Of course, it c

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [Numpy-discussion] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and packaging situation

2009-12-28 Thread David Cournapeau
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > > Do you here mean automatic generation of Ubuntu debs, Debian debs, Windows > MSI installer, Windows EXE installer, and so on? (If so then great!) Yes (although this is not yet implemented). In particular on windows, I want to imple

Re: [matplotlib-devel] [SciPy-dev] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and packaging situation

2009-12-28 Thread David Cournapeau
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > David Cournapeau wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Stefan Schwarzburg >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I would like to add a comment from the user perspective: >>> >>> - the main reason why I'm not satisfied with pypi/distutils/etc. and why >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and packaging situation

2009-12-28 Thread Andrew Straw
Stefan Schwarzburg wrote: > Hi, > I would like to add a comment from the user perspective: > > - the main reason why I'm not satisfied with pypi/distutils/etc. and > why I will not be satisfied with toydist (with the features you > listed), is that they break my installation (debian/ubuntu). The ma

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and packaging situation

2009-12-28 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Stefan Schwarzburg wrote: > Hi, > I would like to add a comment from the user perspective: > > - the main reason why I'm not satisfied with pypi/distutils/etc. and why I > will not be satisfied with toydist (with the features you listed), is that > they break my i

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and packaging situation

2009-12-28 Thread Stefan Schwarzburg
Hi, I would like to add a comment from the user perspective: - the main reason why I'm not satisfied with pypi/distutils/etc. and why I will not be satisfied with toydist (with the features you listed), is that they break my installation (debian/ubuntu). The main advantage of these kinds of linux

[matplotlib-devel] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and packaging situation

2009-12-28 Thread David Cournapeau
(warning, long post) Hi there, As some of you already know, the packaging and distributions of scientific python packages have been a constant source of frustration. Open source is about making it easy for anyone to use software how they see fit, and I think python packaging infrastructure has