I'm really not sure which mailing list to report this on -- it has got
to rank up there with one of the most obscure errors of all times. I
suspect it's an error in gcc's new openmp implementation, gomp, but
not sure; I can report it there if people think I should.
In gcc 4.4.1, when I compile a
Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> would anyone mind if I commit the attached patch?
>
> It's 100% backwards compatible and allows for turning plot directive
> errors into fatal exceptions easily, so one can make sure that docs
> either build correctly or not at all. This is useful for having
> e
Hi all,
would anyone mind if I commit the attached patch?
It's 100% backwards compatible and allows for turning plot directive
errors into fatal exceptions easily, so one can make sure that docs
either build correctly or not at all. This is useful for having
examples be a kind of test suite, in
Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
Adding a "set_ticks" method seems reasonable.
A patch is attached.
It looks like exactly what I had in mind with respect to set_ticks. I
wasn't thinking about set_ticklabels; my sense is that manually setting
tickla
2010/1/25 Nicolas Rougier :
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This is an update about glumpy, a fast-OpenGL based numpy visualization.
> I modified the code such that the only dependencies are PyOpenGL and
> IPython (for interactive sessions). You will also need matplotlib and
> scipy for some demos.
>
> Sources: h
