On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 23:08 +0200, Peter Butterworth wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 16:01 -0700, butterw wrote:
> >> My understanding is that the proposed change will break at least some
> >> existing code, hence my proposal to go the safer r
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 16:01 -0700, butterw wrote:
>> My understanding is that the proposed change will break at least some
>> existing code, hence my proposal to go the safer route.
>
> On what is that understanding based? Any actual examples
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 21:32 -0500, John Hunter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> > You may well be right about this. In any case, I suspect no change will
> > occur prior to the 1.0 release.
>
> I'm +1 on making the proposed change prior to mpl 1.0 (ie now). Call
>
