2010/7/7 Michael Droettboom :
> Thanks for the offer. In the meantime, I committed something myself for
> this. (I should have written back to the list, sorry...)
>
> I'd still be interested in seeing your patch in case there's something extra
> or better in it that mine doesn't do.
Ok, nice, he
Thanks for the offer. In the meantime, I committed something myself for
this. (I should have written back to the list, sorry...)
I'd still be interested in seeing your patch in case there's something
extra or better in it that mine doesn't do.
Mike
On 07/07/2010 02:43 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
2010/7/6 Michael Droettboom :
> One solution to this may be to add an optional dependency on PIL, and if
> found save JPEG files (and maybe some of the other esoteric formats PIL
> supports). The work done a couple of years back to manage the supported
> file types should make this pretty easy.
I
Finally had some time to play with this in detail. First, it's very
cool, and thanks for doing all this work. I noticed a few things:
The path-clipping approach that simply removes negative-valued vertices
doesn't always work, particularly if a line segment begins in the
negative and ends up
David Kirkby discovered that a recent SVN version of matplotlib did not
compile when he was testing a new matplotlib for inclusion in Sage. A
bug was opened here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3022815&group_id=80706&atid=560720
It appears that a patch has been committed to 1
I installed it from the package repositories for Ubuntu 10.04. I will point
out that there were "issues" with the dependencies, but I believe that I
sorted them out (and filed a bug report about it on Launchpad). I will
double-check my other latex documents to see if they still compile.
Thanks,
I have checked in your patch, thanks for the suggestion...
matplotlib 1.0.0 seemed such a distant dream a couple of months back,
which led to the simplistic version check :)
Cheers,
Simon
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> The matplotlib version check seems to fail wit
The matplotlib version check seems to fail with matplotlib 1.0.0. Would
you consider applying the attached patch?
Mike
On 06/21/2010 09:19 AM, Simon Ratcliffe wrote:
Hello,
Our HTML5 based matplotlib backend is now available at:
http://code.google.com/p/mplh5canvas/
There are some basic in
On 07/06/2010 07:49 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:51 AM, william ratcliff
> wrote:
>
>> I just tested it and it's very cool! It works fairly quickly locally. It
>> seems to work for Safari 5 and Chrome beta. Firefox 3.6.3 is a no show. I
>> haven't tried Opera. Wh
Sounds like something missing from your LaTeX install. How did you
install it?
Mike
On 07/06/2010 09:21 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
I am working on converting examples in the mplot3d directory when I
discovered that pathpatch3d_demo.py seems to fail while using LaTeX.
I am getting an error "La
10 matches
Mail list logo
