Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 10/6/2011 10:58 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 10/6/2011 10:42 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >> >> On Thursday, October 6, 2011, John Hunter> > wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christoph Gohlke> > wrote: >>> Is it really

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Benjamin Root
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:55 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > What happens if someone tries to test without having the baseline images? > I > > guess it hasn't been an issue before. > > Tests will fail. But the tests are already pretty depend

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 10/6/2011 10:42 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Thursday, October 6, 2011, John Hunter > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christoph Gohlke > wrote: >> >> > Is it really intended to include ~36 MB of tests/baseline_images in the >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > What happens if someone tries to test without having the baseline images?  I > guess it hasn't been an issue before. Tests will fail. But the tests are already pretty dependent on things like freetype version so it might be more trouble th

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Benjamin Root
On Thursday, October 6, 2011, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> Is it really intended to include ~36 MB of tests/baseline_images in the >> binary distributions for end users? > > I'm OK with excluding the test images from the binaries. Does anyone

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > Is it really intended to include ~36 MB of tests/baseline_images in the > binary distributions for end users? I'm OK with excluding the test images from the binaries. Does anyone disagree? > Do you need eggs (not tested; without pytz a

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 18:09, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 16:57, John Hunter wrote: >>> Great -- they tarballs for the mpl src and sample_data are at >>> >>> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/archives/master >> >> I go

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 10/6/2011 7:57 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> On 10/06/2011 10:46 AM, John Hunter wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:44 AM, John Hunterwrote: On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > P

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 16:57, John Hunter wrote: >> Great -- they tarballs for the mpl src and sample_data are at >> >> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/archives/master > > I got an access denied for sample_data (I'm logged in as 'sand

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 16:57, John Hunter wrote: > Great -- they tarballs for the mpl src and sample_data are at > > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/archives/master I got an access denied for sample_data (I'm logged in as 'sandrotosi' on github) while I can get without problem mpl-1.1.0.

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:57 AM, John Hunter wrote: > Great -- they tarballs for the mpl src and sample_data are at > > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/archives/master > > if Sandro would like to start with the debian packaging.  Russell and > Christoph, if you could point me to some bina

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > On 10/06/2011 10:46 AM, John Hunter wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:44 AM, John Hunter  wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Michael Droettboom >>>  wrote: >>> Pretty simple.  I have a pull request here: htt

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Michael Droettboom
On 10/06/2011 10:46 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:44 AM, John Hunter wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> >>> Pretty simple. I have a pull request here: >>> >>> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/509 >> I confirmed the qt bugs Eric

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:44 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > >> Pretty simple.  I have a pull request here: >> >> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/509 > > I confirmed the qt bugs Eric and Michael were working on and tested > the fix

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > Pretty simple.  I have a pull request here: > > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/509 I confirmed the qt bugs Eric and Michael were working on and tested the fixes, so i merged and closed these two. The only remaining issue

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Michael Droettboom
On 10/06/2011 09:33 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > On 10/05/2011 05:17 PM, John Hunter wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> >>> Sorry to be holding things up after having nagged about getting a >>> release out, but I just now marked #506 "release_critical". It looks >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] propose 1.1.0 release tomorrow

2011-10-06 Thread Michael Droettboom
On 10/05/2011 05:17 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > >> Sorry to be holding things up after having nagged about getting a >> release out, but I just now marked #506 "release_critical". It looks >> like a pretty fundamental bug in blitting on qt4agg, an