On 1 May 2012 17:26, Chris Barker wrote:
> Would there be a problem bringing it in to MPL in that case?
Not from the license point of view - the X11 license is another
permissive BSD-style license. I was just furnishing that detail. ;-)
Thomas
---
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Benjamin Root
> AFAIK, no, it shouldn't be a problem. The question is where. I suspect it
> would fit best as a mpl_toolkit.
yes -- I figured that was most likely.
> P.S. - Of course, you do realize that you are essentially making yourself
> the de facto maintai
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Thomas Kluyver
> wrote:
> > On 1 May 2012 17:04, Chris Barker wrote:
> >> (the license looks BSD-ish to me)
> >
> > At a glance, I think it's the X11 license, aka MIT license.
>
>
> Would there be a problem b
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 1 May 2012 17:04, Chris Barker wrote:
>> (the license looks BSD-ish to me)
>
> At a glance, I think it's the X11 license, aka MIT license.
Would there be a problem bringing it in to MPL in that case?
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker,
Hi folks,
It seems Ken McIvor has more or less disappeared. However, his wxMPL
code is still useful and there are a few of us that are interested in
maintaining it.
What would be the procedure for getting it into a more "official"
location -- like maybe a matplotlib toolkit? Or even mixed right i
