On 2012/12/06 7:16 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I think this has been a very helpful and useful discussion.
>
> I'm going to attempt to summarize this discussion and propose some ways
> forward here.
>
> The impetus for this discussion is that PyCXX seems to be not adequately
> maintained. It i
Just for completeness, there is also ctypes. I wrapped the freetype library
(http://code.google.com/p/freetype-py/) using it and it is quite easy (and
boring). But this only works for C (not C++).
Nicolas
On Dec 6, 2012, at 18:06 , Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I think this has been a very h
I think this has been a very helpful and useful discussion.
I'm going to attempt to summarize this discussion and propose some ways
forward here.
The impetus for this discussion is that PyCXX seems to be not adequately
maintained. It is difficult to build matplotlib with "vanilla" PyCXX in
ce
I think this has been a very helpful and useful discussion.
I'm going to attempt to summarize this discussion and propose some ways
forward here.
The impetus for this discussion is that PyCXX seems to be not adequately
maintained. It is difficult to build matplotlib with "vanilla" PyCXX in
ce
