We have too many pull requests stacking up. As an easy way to deal with
two of them, does anyone strenuously object to merging #1599 and closing
#1581? There are no comments on #1599.
Eric
--
Master Visual Studio, Sha
On 01/09/2013 12:20 PM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote:
Hi all,
A while back, Mike drafted a MEP to modernize the documentation:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/wiki/Mep10
The main idea behind this MEP is to use the full potential of new
tools and conventions available for sphinx, to make the
On 01/09/2013 12:43 PM, Todd wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Nelle Varoquaux
mailto:nelle.varoqu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
- use the autodoc_docstring_signature of sphinx 1.1, which allow
to have the explicit function signature instead of the python one
in the generated documenta
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Nelle Varoquaux
wrote:
>
> - use the autodoc_docstring_signature of sphinx 1.1, which allow to have
> the explicit function signature instead of the python one in the generated
> documentation (args* and **kwargs are replaced by the explicits arguments)
>
>
If you ha
Hi all,
A while back, Mike drafted a MEP to modernize the documentation:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/wiki/Mep10
The main idea behind this MEP is to use the full potential of new tools and
conventions available for sphinx, to make the documentation more readable,
maintainable and con
>
>
> I can work on that and submit a PR.
>
I've submitted a PR (this is Work In Progress):
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/1647
I think ``get_sample_data`` should be moved to a public, documented module,
as, unlike other methods from the cbook module, it is meant for public use.
>
