The patch is applied to the maintenance branch (r8846) and the trunk (r8847).
-JJ
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Stan West wrote:
>> From: Jae-Joon Lee [mailto:lee.j.j...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 05:24
>>
>> Attached is a preliminary fix. So, please test it if you can.
>
> From: Jae-Joon Lee [mailto:lee.j.j...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 05:24
>
> Attached is a preliminary fix. So, please test it if you can.
Thank you. Your fix seems to do the trick.
> I personally think it is better to use "offset points" for these cases
> which makes the int
I believe this was recently introduced when I refactored the annotation code.
Attached is a preliminary fix. So, please test it if you can.
Since the change during the refactoring was rather significant, I'm
not 100% sure if this will restore the old behavior without affecting
the new functionality
Hi. The docs for Annotation [1] say that negative coordinates given for [
figure | axes ] [ points | pixels ] xycoords are to be interpreted relative to
the top-right corner, but I found that they act relative to the bottom-left
corner as for positive coordinates. This can be seen in the attached s
