Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Christopher Barker wrote:
>> Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>> Wx supports polycurves in its new wxGraphicsContext API (but not the
>>> wxDC API that mpl uses now). This means a fairly complete rewrite of
>>> the wx backend,
>> not necessarily. You can create a GraphicsCo
On Nov 8, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
> So, we need to look at the pros/cons of continuing to support these
> legacy APIs going forward.
I've got some more benchmarks for the WX and WXAgg backends in
trunk. It looks like using ssh with compression or the NX remote
desktop b
Christopher Barker wrote:
> Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> Wx supports polycurves in its new wxGraphicsContext API (but not the
>> wxDC API that mpl uses now). This means a fairly complete rewrite of
>> the wx backend,
>
> not necessarily. You can create a GraphicsContext from a wx.DC, you may
>
On Nov 8, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
> I wonder if there is another way to speed that up with Agg -- can you
> compress the bitmap data to pass it to the Xserver? is that happening
> already?
I'm not aware of any obvious method for enabling compression in
remote X11 connectio
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>> So, we need to look at the pros/cons of continuing to support these
>>> legacy APIs going forward.
>> IMHO a gtk and a wx back end are very important for embedding MPL in
>>
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Wx supports polycurves in its new wxGraphicsContext API (but not the
> wxDC API that mpl uses now). This means a fairly complete rewrite of
> the wx backend,
not necessarily. You can create a GraphicsContext from a wx.DC, you may
be able to just add that step for dr
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> So, we need to look at the pros/cons of continuing to support these
>> legacy APIs going forward.
>
> IMHO a gtk and a wx back end are very important for embedding MPL in
> applications. I am sure you ha
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> So, we need to look at the pros/cons of continuing to support these
> legacy APIs going forward.
IMHO a gtk and a wx back end are very important for embedding MPL in
applications. I am sure you have a replacement proposition, bu
The following drawing backends are functional on the transforms branch:
Agg
Ps
Pdf *
Svg
Cairo *
* These could still use some optimizations to draw_markers and/or
draw_path_collection.
Now onto the "problem" ones. I had asked on the mailing list a while
