On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, you're requiring setuptools now? I didn't notice that. Cool.
>
> I'd point them here for up-to-date instructions and downloads:
>
> http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/setuptools
Thanks Robert for the insight! I updated the installation
inst
Robert Kern wrote:
> Oh, you're requiring setuptools now? I didn't notice that. Cool.
>
Just for Python 2.3 so that we could sanitize the setup.py a little.
(Namely for the backport of the package_data field to setup().) It's not
required for Python >= 2.4 since package_data is already in stock
John Hunter wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The purpose of ez_setup.py was to give people a migration path such that they
>> could write project that used setuptools, but ensure that their users
>> wouldn't
>> have to go install another package themselves.
>>
>> It
On 4/5/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The purpose of ez_setup.py was to give people a migration path such that they
> could write project that used setuptools, but ensure that their users wouldn't
> have to go install another package themselves.
>
> It's deprecated now. Don't use it.
Robert Kern wrote:
> John Hunter wrote:
>
>> On 4/5/07, Edin Salkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This would make installing setuptools even easier, since the newest
>>> ez_setup/seuptools would be downloaded by the user/developer every
>>> time a "svn update;python setup.py instal
John Hunter wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Edin Salkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This would make installing setuptools even easier, since the newest
>> ez_setup/seuptools would be downloaded by the user/developer every
>> time a "svn update;python setup.py install" is issued.
>>
>> Are the above chan
On 4/5/07, Edin Salkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This would make installing setuptools even easier, since the newest
> ez_setup/seuptools would be downloaded by the user/developer every
> time a "svn update;python setup.py install" is issued.
>
> Are the above changes OK?
I'm not sure I see
On Thursday 05 April 2007 06:44:36 am Edin Salkovic wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I considered this when setuptools became a requirement for python-2.3
> > installs, but decided against it. My reasoning was that the unfamiliar
> > user would go to install matplotlib
On Thursday 05 April 2007 4:29:00 am Edin Salkovic wrote:
> On 3/3/07, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/23/07, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I figured I would be a good crash test dummy to see how easy
> > it was to install setuptools, so I poked around and found the ez
On 4/5/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I considered this when setuptools became a requirement for python-2.3
> installs, but decided against it. My reasoning was that the unfamiliar user
> would go to install matplotlib, and see setup.py and ez_setup and get
> confused. Maybe it should
On 3/3/07, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I figured I would be a good crash test dummy to see how easy
> it was to install setuptools, so I poked around and found the ez_setup
> and am off to the races. I added a friendly exception to
11 matches
Mail list logo
