On Nov 29, 2007 2:14 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems like a good idea to me, and it works for me (I can build mpl
> with the TkAgg extension from a console with X completely shutdown on
> RHEL4...).
I tested in my normal X11 enabled solaris build environment and in a
Ah! I see you just applied it yourself, John.
Consider the question answered!
(And again, thanks for the patch, Ludwig.)
Cheers,
Mike
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> This seems like a good idea to me, and it works for me (I can build mpl
> with the TkAgg extension from a console with X completely
On Nov 29, 2007 10:13 AM, Ludwig Schwardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any chance that the patch I submitted on 31 October on this
> list could still make it into 0.91.0?
91.0 is already out, but I just committed it so it will make it in for 91.1.
> On an aside, what is the best
This seems like a good idea to me, and it works for me (I can build mpl
with the TkAgg extension from a console with X completely shutdown on
RHEL4...).
John -- does the timing for this work with you release plans? (It
probably needs some testing in a bunch of different environments.) If
so,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:13:39 +0200
Ludwig Schwardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've reworked the Tcl/Tk checking code in setupext.py (see attached
> patch). It is now possible to build matplotlib with Tk support without
> requiring a running X server. This is useful for doing autobuilds
> (e.g. a
Hi,
Is there any chance that the patch I submitted on 31 October on this
list could still make it into 0.91.0?
On an aside, what is the best way to submit patches to mpl? Via the
bug-tracker, or as attached files or direct in-line in mpl-devel
mails?
To refresh your memory on the patch:
I've re
