On 10/04/2012 11:56 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
>> So as you wrote in the MEP, Numpy will simply have to be installed
>> separately, I think, if the C++ modules require the Numpy headers.
> Which is totally fine -- MPL requires a bunch of non-python
On 10/04/2012 06:16 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 3 October 2012 22:08, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>> Concerning end user experience, the scipy-stack project seems like a
>> better place to address this.
> To expand on this, there's a discussion underway on the scipy-user and
> numfocus mailing list
On 10/03/2012 05:08 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> On 10/3/2012 9:20 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> I invite comments for a new MEP about improving the situation with
>> respect to our bundling of third-party Python dependencies.
>>
>> In particular, I'd love feedback from the various stakeholders
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I invite comments for a new MEP about improving the situation with respect
> to our bundling of third-party Python dependencies.
>
> In particular, I'd love feedback from the various stakeholders -- those
> producing binary installers and
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> So as you wrote in the MEP, Numpy will simply have to be installed
> separately, I think, if the C++ modules require the Numpy headers.
Which is totally fine -- MPL requires a bunch of non-python
dependencies (OK, a few) anyway, so no matter how
On 3 October 2012 22:08, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> Concerning end user experience, the scipy-stack project seems like a
> better place to address this.
To expand on this, there's a discussion underway on the scipy-user and
numfocus mailing lists about standardising a set of packages making up
the
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 05:26 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
>> On 10/03/2012 12:20 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>> I invite comments for a new MEP about improving the situation with
>>> respect to our bundling of third-party Python dependencies.
>>>
>>> I
On 10/03/2012 05:26 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 12:20 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> I invite comments for a new MEP about improving the situation with
>> respect to our bundling of third-party Python dependencies.
>>
>> In particular, I'd love feedback from the various stakeholders -- t
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> On 10/3/2012 9:20 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> I invite comments for a new MEP about improving the situation with
>> respect to our bundling of third-party Python dependencies.
>>
>> In particular, I'd love feedback from the various st
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
A bunch of great stuff:
+1 all around
Another use-case is py2exe, py2app, and friends -- at the moment, you
pretty much have to include the whole dang MPL package to get things
to work. Cleaning up some of these dependencies could improve
On 10/3/2012 9:20 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I invite comments for a new MEP about improving the situation with
> respect to our bundling of third-party Python dependencies.
>
> In particular, I'd love feedback from the various stakeholders -- those
> producing binary installers and packages f
I invite comments for a new MEP about improving the situation with
respect to our bundling of third-party Python dependencies.
In particular, I'd love feedback from the various stakeholders -- those
producing binary installers and packages for the various platforms.
https://github.com/matplot
12 matches
Mail list logo
