On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:01:26 -0600, John Hunter wrote:
> I will try and get to the release ASAP and set the sample_data up this way...
>
Any news on this? A release would be very nice. I did the bulk of the
work[1] to get the debian packaging working with the 1.0 series but I
can't really do much
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> What's the plan about 1.0.1? is it going to be release soon? will it
> include the sample_data dir in the released tarball, so that we can
> set examples.download = False, and examples.directory =
> "/sample_data" inside the tarball? that w
Hi all,
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 09:25, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> Jouni K. Seppänen writes:
>
>> Benjamin Root writes:
>>
As an Ubuntu user, I would really a mechanism
for excluding examples requiring downloaded data from being built
>>>
>>> How far did we get on that? I could have sw
> > So now on the 1.0 maintenance branch (coming soon to trunk, once I'm
> > done wrangling with svnmerge) you can set new rc parameters
> > examples.download to False and examples.directory to the directory
> >
> How would one set these during the build process? Is there a way to pass
> in rc par
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 10:25:13 +0200, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> So now on the 1.0 maintenance branch (coming soon to trunk, once I'm
> done wrangling with svnmerge) you can set new rc parameters
> examples.download to False and examples.directory to the directory where
> you have a checkout of the
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> So now on the 1.0 maintenance branch (coming soon to trunk, once I'm
> done wrangling with svnmerge) you can set new rc parameters
> examples.download to False and examples.directory to the directory where
> you have a checkout of the samp
Jouni K. Seppänen writes:
> Benjamin Root writes:
>
>>> As an Ubuntu user, I would really a mechanism
>>> for excluding examples requiring downloaded data from being built
>>
>> How far did we get on that? I could have sworn we did something
>> about the caching mechanism.
>
> I'll commit s
Benjamin Root writes:
>> As an Ubuntu user, I would really a mechanism
>> for excluding examples requiring downloaded data from being built
>
> How far did we get on that? I could have sworn we did something
> about the caching mechanism.
I think there were some discussions (something to do
On Saturday, November 6, 2010, Ben Gamari wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Not so long ago there was a brief discussion concerning the release
> schedule for 1.0.1[1]. As an Ubuntu user, I would really a mechanism
> for excluding examples requiring downloaded data from being built for
> the doc target. This
Hey all,
Not so long ago there was a brief discussion concerning the release
schedule for 1.0.1[1]. As an Ubuntu user, I would really a mechanism
for excluding examples requiring downloaded data from being built for
the doc target. This would bring matplotlib into compliance with
Debian packaging
10 matches
Mail list logo
